On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Gary Klinekl...@thought.org wrote:
sorry: should have been bounce back. when i responded to the middle
of
an on-going debate last night, i received an automated reply that my
post
had to be approved because there were too many
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 09:26:05AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Gary Klinekl...@thought.org wrote:
sorry: should have been bounce back. when i responded to the
middle of
an on-going debate last night, i received an automated reply that my
i got a bizarre bouch back saying that my post from last night had to be
okayed.. like, say what:_)
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org
For FBSD list:
Gary Kline wrote:
i got a bizarre bouch back saying that my post from last night had to be
okayed.. like, say what:_)
What?
Steve
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:00:37PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Gary Kline wrote:
i got a bizarre bouch back saying that my post from last night had to be
okayed.. like, say what:_)
What?
sorry: should have been bounce back. when i responded to the middle
of
an
