Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
2012-05-06 20:23, Robert Bonomi skrev:
Including *every* loadable module, whether or not you actually use it.
That's not really true, at least not for me, and I have not made any
changes to the build environment. The loadable module that I actually
the options (PAL) seem to magically work! :-)
I found that every loadable kernel module in the base system is, or at least
was, rebuilt.
That's correct so far. Additionally, all components specified
by the kernel configuration file will be rebuilt, which in case
of _no_ alteration is the content
In the Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64, if I do
not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry?
# Floppy drives
device fdc
Are there any other entries that I could eliminate if I do not have a
floppy drive?
Also, according the the webcamd
Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote;
In the Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64, if I do
not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry?
# Floppy drives
device fdc
Definitely, yes.
Are there any other entries that I could eliminate if I do not have
On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT)
Robert Bonomi articulated:
Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote;
In the Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64, if I do
not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry?
# Floppy drives
device fdc
Definitely, yes
On Sunday 06 May 2012 10:34:12 Carmel wrote:
On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT)
Robert Bonomi articulated:
Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote;
In the Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64, if I do
not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry
On 06/05/2012 14:34, Carmel wrote:
Is there a way that I can simply compile it into the kernel? Would a:
device cuse4bsd# Required by webcamd
entry in the kernel file work? I cannot find any documentation on
that.
cuse4bsd is a third party module. This means that the sources aren't
On Sun, 06 May 2012 14:58:39 +0100
Matthew Seaman articulated:
cuse4bsd is a third party module. This means that the sources aren't
available as part of the base system, so making work as compiled-in
code in the kernel will require you to create patches for your kernel
source tree. Not
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun May 6 08:36:52 2012
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:34:12 -0400
From: Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com
To: FreeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kernel configuration file
On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT)
Robert Bonomi articulated
On Sun, 6 May 2012 13:23:08 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun May 6 08:36:52 2012
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:34:12 -0400
From: Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com
To: FreeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kernel configuration file
I have upgrade src to Revision: 234068
# cd /usr/src
# make -j 8 buildkernel KERNCONF=KES_KERN_v10
ERROR: Missing kernel configuration file(s) (KES_KERN_v10).
*** Error code 1
1 error
*** Error code 2
1 error
# cd /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf
# ls
.cvsignore GENERIC.hints
КЕ I have upgrade src to Revision: 234068
КЕ # cd /usr/src
КЕ # make -j 8 buildkernel KERNCONF=KES_KERN_v10
КЕ ERROR: Missing kernel configuration file(s) (KES_KERN_v10).
КЕ *** Error code 1
КЕ 1 error
КЕ *** Error code 2
КЕ 1 error
КЕ # cd /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf
КЕ # ls
КЕ .cvsignore
Hello,
I am have a fresh install of FreeBSD 8.0 i386 and need to install an amd64
kernel.
I have copied /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC to
/usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/JERRY
Then, I run make buildkernel KERNCONF=JERRY in /usr/src and get the
following error:
ERROR: Missing kernel configuration file
and get the
following error:
ERROR: Missing kernel configuration file(s) (JERRY).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
It seems to want JERRY to be in i386/conf. If I copy JERRY to i386/conf
and
run make buildkernel KERNCONF=JERRY, I get the following
I am have a fresh install of FreeBSD 8.0 i386 and need to install an amd64
kernel.
I have copied /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC to
/usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/JERRY
Support for cross-building is limited in the FreeBSD base system.
/usr/src/Makefile states:
# If TARGET=machine (e.g. ia64,
Hello everyone!
First of all i would like to apologize to anyone who finds my appeal a lazy
man's choice, actually it's indeed lazy but it's the best way to get an
answer from a valid source. My problem is a potential DOS/DDOS... i know a
forever talked about issue... i've already searched the
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Bogdan Webb bog...@pgn.ro wrote:
i've already searched the freebsd's mailing
lists and found some mitigation techniques, to bad that google ain't that
familiar with FreeBSD, and searchin' for guides is a pain...
http://www.google.com/bsd
--
Adam Vande More
Bogdan Webb wrote:
Hello everyone!
First of all i would like to apologize to anyone who finds my appeal a lazy
man's choice, actually it's indeed lazy but it's the best way to get an
answer from a valid source. My problem is a potential DOS/DDOS... i know a
forever talked about issue... i've
in the handbook.
http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=30920postcount=9
--- En date de : Jeu 26.11.09, S4mmael s4mm...@gmail.com a écrit :
De: S4mmael s4mm...@gmail.com
Objet: freebsd-update with MYKERNEL kernel configuration
À: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Jeudi 26 Novembre 2009, 13h32
Hi all!
I've got a problem while upgrading FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p3 - FreeBSD
8.0-RELESE with freebsd-update(8).
First of all I made a copy of the most configuration files. Then I made:
# freebsd-update -r 8.0-RELEASE upgrade
All went good, except the message, that because of MYKERNEL kernel
good, except the message, that because of MYKERNEL kernel
configuration I should upgrade my kernel before freebsd-upgrade
install.
That message should probably be more strongly worded. It is absolutely
*imperative* that the custom kernel is upgraded before continuing with
freebsd-upgrade install
:
De: S4mmael s4mm...@gmail.com
Objet: freebsd-update with MYKERNEL kernel configuration
À: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Jeudi 26 Novembre 2009, 13h32
Hi all!
I've got a problem while upgrading FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p3
- FreeBSD
8.0-RELESE with freebsd-update(8).
First of all I made
Chuck Swiger wrote:
[snip]
While it is true that you can comment out all but i686 and get a
working kernel, you will experience reduced performance. There are a
number of low-level assembly routines (cf sys/i386/i386/support.s such
as i586_bcopy) that are conditionalized off of I586_CPU
In the last episode (Jan 15), Michael Powell said:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
While it is true that you can comment out all but i686 and get a
working kernel, you will experience reduced performance. There are
a number of low-level assembly routines (cf sys/i386/i386/support.s
such as
On Jan 15, 2009, at 11:31 AM, Dan Nelson wrote:
Actually, those functions are only enabled if the CPU is truly a
586-class processor. See /sys/i386/isa/npx.c , the npx_attach()
function. There is a test for cpu_class==CPUCLASS_586, while most
modern CPUs are CPUCLASS_686.
Thanks for the
hello,
i am going through the kernel configuration file to build a custom
kernel and am not quite sure i understand this part correctly.
my cpu is an athlon 64 x2 but i am running i386, so i am assuming that
in the config file i state that my cpu is i386, not athlon 64.
i ran frebsd
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:37:53PM +0100, icemaca wrote:
this i386 version has
cpu I486_CPU
cpu I586_CPU
cpu I686_CPU
Basically you can comment all but I686_CPU since the others are for
earlier x86 architectures.
-ewald
On Jan 14, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:37:53PM +0100, icemaca wrote:
this i386 version has
cpu I486_CPU
cpu I586_CPU
cpu I686_CPU
Basically you can comment all but I686_CPU since the others are for
earlier x86
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:37:53PM +0100, icemaca wrote:
this i386 version has
cpu I486_CPU
cpu I586_CPU
cpu I686_CPU
Basically
On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM, t-u-t wrote:
While it is true that you can comment out all but i686 and get a
working
kernel, you will experience reduced performance. There are a
number of
low-level assembly routines (cf sys/i386/i386/support.s such as
i586_bcopy)
that are conditionalized
=KERNEL
ERROR: Missing kernel configuration file(s) (KERNEL)
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src
#
Лидер бывает только один - UzNet
www.uznet.net
=KERNEL
ERROR: Missing kernel configuration file(s) (KERNEL)
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src
#
Лидер бывает только один - UzNet
www.uznet.net
filesystem exactly where it should be. I'm not even sure
why exactly it's trying to build that, as I'm pretty sure that I
disabled the modules in the kernel configuration file which use that
source.
Actually, that's not the problem.
The file which is not found is the compiler itself:
gcc34
Actually, that's not the problem.
The file which is not found is the compiler itself:
gcc34:No such file or directory
Maybe you've installed gcc 4.3 from ports, linked /usr/bin/cc to
/usr/local/bin/gcc43 and then upgrade gcc?
That doesn't seem right:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src]$ which
coriolinus wrote:
Actually, that's not the problem.
The file which is not found is the compiler itself:
gcc34:No such file or directory
Maybe you've installed gcc 4.3 from ports, linked /usr/bin/cc to
/usr/local/bin/gcc43 and then upgrade gcc?
That doesn't seem right:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I remember that in FreeBSD 4 there was a way to include configuration file
in the kernel being compiled, but I could not remember what it was and I
could not find it in the handbook. Is there such feature in FreeBSD 6 ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Sat 31 Mar 2007 20:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember that in FreeBSD 4 there was a way to include configuration file
in the kernel being compiled, but I could not remember what it was and I
could not find it in the handbook. Is there such feature in FreeBSD 6 ?
From
XP 2600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a FreeBSD 5.4 server i try to change iNMBCLUSTERS kernel
configuration option using sysctl nmbclusters but its giving me sysctl:
unknown oid 'nmbclusters', am i missed something ? or its no longer
available in FreeBSD 5 ??
It should be there. Please
On 13 Mar 2006 10:51:17 -0500, Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XP 2600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a FreeBSD 5.4 server i try to change iNMBCLUSTERS kernel
configuration option using sysctl nmbclusters but its giving me sysctl:
unknown oid 'nmbclusters', am i missed something
I have a FreeBSD 5.4 server i try to change iNMBCLUSTERS kernel
configuration option using sysctl nmbclusters but its giving me sysctl:
unknown oid 'nmbclusters', am i missed something ? or its no longer
available in FreeBSD 5 ??
--
Emam
El 3asfra land
Hello. I quoted the subject of the email directly from the kernel changes
section of the FreeBSD/i386-RELEASE release notes. I am not sure if I am
reading this correctly, but does this mean that people who have Intel-based
processors (such as P4 and Celeron) should not use 6.0 and only use
On 2006-01-09 09:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. I quoted the subject of the email directly from the kernel
changes section of the FreeBSD/i386-RELEASE release notes. I am not
sure if I am reading this correctly, but does this mean that people
who have Intel-based processors (such as P4
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:58:20AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. I quoted the subject of the email directly from the kernel changes
section of the FreeBSD/i386-RELEASE release notes. I am not sure if I am
reading this correctly, but does this mean that people who have
Intel-based
Please break your lines at around 70 characters. It makes it much
easier for people with text based Email readers to read and respond
to your posts.
Hello. I quoted the subject of the email directly from the kernel
changes section of the FreeBSD/i386-RELEASE release notes. I am not
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:42:02 -0500, Leon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm installing a BSD, and by documentation what provided, on the beginning of
installation I should see Kernel Configuration screen. But after the system
buts from my CD, it bring me to the Sysinstall Main Menu. It skip
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:42:02AM -0500, Leon wrote:
Hi,
I'm installing a BSD, and by documentation what provided, on the beginning of
installation I should see Kernel Configuration screen. But after the system
buts from my CD, it bring me to the Sysinstall Main Menu. It skip Kernel
Hi,
I'm installing a BSD, and by documentation what provided, on the beginning of
installation I should see Kernel Configuration screen. But after the system
buts from my CD, it bring me to the Sysinstall Main Menu. It skip Kernel
Conf.
Should I configurate a Kernel?
If yes, how can a get
kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/i386
#
# For more information on this file, please read the handbook section on
# Kernel Configuration Files:
#
#http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.html
#
# The handbook is also available locally in /usr/share/doc
Jian Guang Xu wrote:
I've been trying to configure my first custom kernel according to the
Handbook and looks that I got error in my configuration file, Would
somebody please help me out?
Thank you in advance.
++
Here is my custom configuration file:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.html
where do i put this ?
device sound
i am using freebsd 5.3b7
Can you please at to the manual the path of the kernel configuration file thx
Do i need to recompile the kernel
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 06:09:56AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.html
where do i put this ?
device sound
i am using freebsd 5.3b7
The easier option is to put:
snd_driver_load=YES
in /boot/loader.conf.
--
Jonathan
did that doesnt work for me ?
asus SK8N onboard sound acl850 if i am not mistaken.
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:21:30 +1300, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 06:09:56AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote:
[Please don't top post, it's really hard to read]
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 06:52:56AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote:
i dont have any snd_*.ko files and the sound chip is suported by freebsd
If you're running 5.3b7, they should be there; it comes with the
default install.
--
Jonathan Chen [EMAIL
i did custom install :P
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 18:12:20 +1300, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Please don't top post, it's really hard to read]
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 06:52:56AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote:
i dont have any snd_*.ko files and the sound chip is suported by freebsd
If
So i guess this mean kernel compilation from src ? Or can i install
them separately ?
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 07:13:47 +0200, Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i did custom install :P
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 18:12:20 +1300, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Please don't top post, it's
Sometimes when I want to install 4.10 I get a menu right after boot that
tells me if I want to configure kernel or not. But the problem is it doesn't
show up on some machines. Does anybody know why?
* The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use
of the intended
Hi
sorry if this might sound lazy but I am wondering if there is any way or
any program that reads your out put of dmesg and creates a kernel
configuration file based on what generic kernel has found so I can use
it to compile the new one which has only modules which I need
In that case
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 09:47:30 -0400
Ara Avvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
sorry if this might sound lazy but I am wondering if there is any way or
any program that reads your out put of dmesg and creates a kernel
configuration file based on what generic kernel has found so I can use
Hi I am sorry to ask this, but yesterday I was looking to see if there
is anyway to read the output of dmesg and automatically convert it to a
readable format to be used to compile the new kernel. In that way it
will be more specified based on that hardware and making sure I am not
removing
Hi guys,
I just switched from linux to freebsd (noob) and trying to configure the kernel. My PC
is Dell Lattitude CSxH PIII 500, 256MB RAM. Now problems:
o According to LINT the CONF_FLAGS inhibit use of non-optimal function does this
mean that my kernel will be optimized?
o I increased
o According to LINT the CONF_FLAGS inhibit use of non-optimal function
does this mean that my kernel will be optimized?
If you don't know what a kernel variable or flag does, then don't use it.
FreeBSD performs really well without configuring every last option.
o I increased the process limits
o options like: KTRACE, INVARIANTS, INVARIANT_SUPPORT,
DIAGNOSTIC are for kernel debugging, am I right? I also read
in LINT that it will make my kernel size larger. Does large
kernels means worse performance? Do I really need to debug my kernel?
No, you don't need to debug your kernel,
% grep NFS /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/MEITSIN
#optionsNFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client
#optionsNFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server
#optionsNFS_ROOT# NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT
% ls /boot/kernel/nfs*
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 08:20:42PM +0200, Toni Heinonen wrote:
% grep NFS /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/MEITSIN
#optionsNFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client
#optionsNFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server
#optionsNFS_ROOT# NFS usable
* Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-26 10:56]:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 08:20:42PM +0200, Toni Heinonen wrote:
I didn't give options NFSCLIENT or NFSSERVER yet it seems to have compiled
support. What gives?
What you don't compile into your kernel (by eg. 'options NFSCLIENT')
[ kernel modules ]
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:03:49AM -0800, Joshua Lokken wrote:
* Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-26 10:56]:
What you don't compile into your kernel (by eg. 'options NFSCLIENT')
will generally be compiled as a loadable module instead -- here
nfsclient.ko
I've
* Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-26 11:57]:
[ kernel modules ]
If you put NO_MODULES=true into /etc/make.conf, then you'll only get
the kernel build. You won't get any extra loadable modules.
Got it. Thank you. On my workstations, where resources are
plentiful, I suppose it
atapci2: Intel ICH5 SATA150 controller port 0xd000-0xd00f,
0xcc00-0xcc03,0xc800-0xc807,0xc400-0xc403,0xc000-0xc007
irq 9 at device 31.2 on pci0
ata4: at 0xc000 on atapci2
ata5: at 0xc800 on atapci2
The relevant part of my kernel configuration
I've been experimenting with kernel configurations and network
performance. I'm running a dual Xeon processor (500MHz) system with
10/100 ethernet (Intel). It's an Intel motherboard. The cable is CAT5
and I'm transferring between the FBSD box and an Apple G4 laptop with
10/100 ethernet. This
Toomas Aas wrote:
2)I used the iso disk1 to install version 5.1 but I could not configure
the kernel. I followed the kernel configuration procedure and the
linking process yielded the following lines:
BEGIN of inserted lines -
linking kernel
umass.o: In function
2)I used the iso disk1 to install version 5.1 but I could not configure
the kernel. I followed the kernel configuration procedure and the
linking process yielded the following lines:
BEGIN of inserted lines -
linking kernel
umass.o: In function `umass_cam_attach_sim
On Saturday 08 March 2003 04:26 pm, charles pelletier wrote:
Okay, just to make sure this is correct (my first use of the newer more
current kernel config)..
The only steps involved are those listed in the handbook:
Change to the /usr/src directory.
# cd /usr/src
Compile the kernel.
thanks for the help !
Charles Pelletier
Tech Coordinator
St Luke's School
Irving, TX
-Original Message-
From: taxman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'freebsd'
Subject: Re: kernel configuration
On Saturday 08 March 2003 04:26 pm
On Monday 11 November 2002 21:24, Stefan Farrenkopf wrote:
Hi there,
I hope anybody can help me.
I followed the Handbook to make a new kernel. The main interest for
doing so is: I need to mount Netware volumes, etc. and I want to use my
onboard SoundMax sound device. By going through I
buildkernel command (second way to build a
kernel), but it refuses to work with:
localhost# make buildkernel KERNCONF=mykernel
make: don't know how to make buildkernel. Stop
Thanks for your help, cheers
Stefan
My kernel configuration file follows:
#
# mykernel -- kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/i386
75 matches
Mail list logo
