On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:35:55 -0500
fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please expand on your comment about 4.10 being the next stable
release. I take this to mean that 5.2.1 is an long way off from
moving to the stable branch. Are you in the inter-circle that
authorizes the movement of
fbsd_user wrote:
Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download
images?
You can grab ISO of the latest build from here:
http://snapshots.jp.freebsd.org/
At least, you used to be able to. Not sure exactly how up to date
they are.
--
Jonathan Arnold (mailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
Can anyone confirm whether 5.1R is affected by yesterday's
security advisory (FreeBSD-SA-04:04.tcp)?
On the one hand it says that this affects All FreeBSD releases but on
the other hand only lists STABLE, 5.2, 5.2.1, 4.9 and 4.8 under
corrected. Does this mean it IS affected but not yet
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:24:43AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote:
Can anyone confirm whether 5.1R is affected by yesterday's
security advisory (FreeBSD-SA-04:04.tcp)?
On the one hand it says that this affects All FreeBSD releases but on
the other hand only lists STABLE, 5.2, 5.2.1, 4.9 and 4.8
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:29:14 +
Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:24:43AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote:
Can anyone confirm whether 5.1R is affected by yesterday's
security advisory (FreeBSD-SA-04:04.tcp)?
On the one hand it says that this affects All
the patch when sources were updated)
Thanks in advance for the clarification,
Ron Clark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Seaman
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 7:29 AM
To: Ed Budd
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: latest security
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:00:09AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote:
I think what's confusing me here is that I assumed that 5.1R was
still officially supported and every other advisory up to this one has
been included, like last week's FreeBSD-SA-04:03.jail advisory, for
example. So am I to assume then
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:35:00AM -0600, Ronald Clark wrote:
I have what I hope is a simple question. If I cvsup my sources and
complete the makeworld and installworld processes, will that install the
patch, or do I need to apply manually and recompile the kernel? (I have
been under the
Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download
images?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matthew
Seaman
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:40 AM
To: Ronald Clark
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: latest security advisory
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:00:09AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote:
I think what's confusing me here is that I assumed that 5.1R was
still officially supported and every other advisory up to this one has
been included, like last week's FreeBSD-SA-04:03.jail advisory, for
example.
fbsd_user wrote:
Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download
images?
Not sure, but certainly not put into -RELEASES.
I imagine you'd have to grab a snapshot ISO
Kevin Kinsey
DaleCo, S.P.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:54:22AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download
images?
No -- the iso images are produced at release time and not altered
after that. However, binary patches are being produced by Colin
Percival's FreeBSD-update
To: fbsd_user
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:54:22AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download
images?
No -- the iso images are produced at release time and not altered
after that. However
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:35:55PM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
Please expand on your comment about 4.10 being the next stable
release. I take this to mean that 5.2.1 is an long way off from
moving to the stable branch. Are you in the inter-circle that
authorizes the movement of development branch
[ please don't post on top, tnx ]
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:35:55 -0500
fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please expand on your comment about 4.10 being the next stable
release. I take this to mean that 5.2.1 is an long way off from
moving to the stable branch. Are you in the inter-circle that
15 matches
Mail list logo