Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-05 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:35:55 -0500 fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please expand on your comment about 4.10 being the next stable release. I take this to mean that 5.2.1 is an long way off from moving to the stable branch. Are you in the inter-circle that authorizes the movement of

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-04 Thread Jonathan Arnold
fbsd_user wrote: Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download images? You can grab ISO of the latest build from here: http://snapshots.jp.freebsd.org/ At least, you used to be able to. Not sure exactly how up to date they are. -- Jonathan Arnold (mailto:[EMAIL

latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Ed Budd
Hi, Can anyone confirm whether 5.1R is affected by yesterday's security advisory (FreeBSD-SA-04:04.tcp)? On the one hand it says that this affects All FreeBSD releases but on the other hand only lists STABLE, 5.2, 5.2.1, 4.9 and 4.8 under corrected. Does this mean it IS affected but not yet

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:24:43AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote: Can anyone confirm whether 5.1R is affected by yesterday's security advisory (FreeBSD-SA-04:04.tcp)? On the one hand it says that this affects All FreeBSD releases but on the other hand only lists STABLE, 5.2, 5.2.1, 4.9 and 4.8

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Ed Budd
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:29:14 + Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:24:43AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote: Can anyone confirm whether 5.1R is affected by yesterday's security advisory (FreeBSD-SA-04:04.tcp)? On the one hand it says that this affects All

RE: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Ronald Clark
the patch when sources were updated) Thanks in advance for the clarification, Ron Clark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Seaman Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 7:29 AM To: Ed Budd Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: latest security

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:00:09AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote: I think what's confusing me here is that I assumed that 5.1R was still officially supported and every other advisory up to this one has been included, like last week's FreeBSD-SA-04:03.jail advisory, for example. So am I to assume then

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:35:00AM -0600, Ronald Clark wrote: I have what I hope is a simple question. If I cvsup my sources and complete the makeworld and installworld processes, will that install the patch, or do I need to apply manually and recompile the kernel? (I have been under the

RE: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread fbsd_user
Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download images? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matthew Seaman Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:40 AM To: Ronald Clark Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: latest security advisory

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Matthew Seaman wrote: On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:00:09AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote: I think what's confusing me here is that I assumed that 5.1R was still officially supported and every other advisory up to this one has been included, like last week's FreeBSD-SA-04:03.jail advisory, for example.

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
fbsd_user wrote: Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download images? Not sure, but certainly not put into -RELEASES. I imagine you'd have to grab a snapshot ISO Kevin Kinsey DaleCo, S.P. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:54:22AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote: Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download images? No -- the iso images are produced at release time and not altered after that. However, binary patches are being produced by Colin Percival's FreeBSD-update

RE: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread fbsd_user
To: fbsd_user Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:54:22AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote: Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download images? No -- the iso images are produced at release time and not altered after that. However

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:35:55PM -0500, fbsd_user wrote: Please expand on your comment about 4.10 being the next stable release. I take this to mean that 5.2.1 is an long way off from moving to the stable branch. Are you in the inter-circle that authorizes the movement of development branch

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
[ please don't post on top, tnx ] On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:35:55 -0500 fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please expand on your comment about 4.10 being the next stable release. I take this to mean that 5.2.1 is an long way off from moving to the stable branch. Are you in the inter-circle that