the significance is lost on Bernt, /rescue/sh does not
rely on libc, so it won't care if libc is broken.
Danny
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Thank you all for your input.
Went to the office very dark in my mind.
I found a cd with amd64 8.0-R and I could
copy libc.so.7
I Thank you ALLnow i'm crying
so I leave you now.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello list!
It's me again.
I was happily upgrading my jail make build* and so on.
Make installworld failed with som chflag set on libc.so.7
so i left jail and went to the host and tought I fixit from there.
I did remove the chflag and all was well I tought, but no.
Copy it to the jail,
On Feb 21, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
Hello list!
It's me again.
I was happily upgrading my jail make build* and so on.
Make installworld failed with som chflag set on libc.so.7
so i left jail and went to the host and tought I fixit from there.
I
2013-02-21 15:43, Fleuriot Damien skrev:
On Feb 21, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
Hello list!
It's me again.
I was happily upgrading my jail make build* and so on.
Make installworld failed with som chflag set on libc.so.7
so i left jail and went to the host
to activate it for you?), and ultimately mounts your
system to present a working shell to fix your problems.
Important: when it asks you if you want to chroot into the mounted filesystem,
say NO (you're libc isn't working, so that would be a bad idea) -- rather, run
from the LiveFS environment where
?), and ultimately mounts your system to present a working shell to fix
your problems.
Important: when it asks you if you want to chroot into the mounted filesystem,
say NO (you're libc isn't working, so that would be a bad idea) -- rather, run
from the LiveFS environment where /mnt is your mounted system
On Feb 21, 2013, at 6:22 PM, Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev:
Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got this ...
That is correct. So no cd burning no nothing...Well it want to drop in to a
single shell bla bla bla press enter for /bin/sh
for /bin/sh
enter
libexec* libc.so.7: invalid file format
IIRC you get an option at this point to enter a full path to the
shell, enter /rescue/sh which will get you a statically linked shell. You
should then be able to use the tools in /rescue to replace libc provided
you can somehow get
From: Bernt Hansson [b...@bananmonarki.se]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:22 AM
To: Teske, Devin
Cc: Fleuriot Damien; questions FreeBSD
Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc
2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev:
Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got
that can be reached via
/rescue/rcp for you.
--
Devin
From: Bernt Hansson [b...@bananmonarki.se]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:22 AM
To: Teske, Devin
Cc: Fleuriot Damien; questions FreeBSD
Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc
2013-02-21 18:01
just copying the libc from PC-BSD to your host, and
then just reinstall for sanity's sake.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions
On 22/02/2013 10:07, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Yes that is an idea. Since Damien was kind to host the file I downloaded
it and will try later today (friday)
The problem is I can't burn or otherwise get in to the machine.
libc.so.7: invalid file format
You missed the earlier suggestion - at the
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 02:21:28 +0400
Артем Зуйков cher...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I can't build anything with clang libc++
What am I doing wrong?
clang++ -stdlib=libc++ test1.cpp -o x
In file included from test1.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/cstdlib:134:9: error: no member named
Hi,
I can't build anything with clang libc++
What am I doing wrong?
clang++ -stdlib=libc++ test1.cpp -o x
In file included from test1.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/cstdlib:134:9: error: no member named 'at_quick_exit'
in the global namespace
using ::at_quick_exit;
~~^
/usr/include/c++/v1/cstdlib
it it I got the message:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /lib/libc.so.7: version FBSD_1.3 required
by /usr/local/bin/postgres not found
seems that only postgres is check for the libc version???
is there a compile switch to check for that???
Of course, if I compile postgres in the 8.2 or upgrade to 8.3
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Jun 18 08:21:38 2012
From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi lenzi.ser...@gmail.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:20:09 -0300
Subject: libc version
Hello...
I upgrade the server from version 8.2 to 8.3, and rebuild all
Ok thank you for your answer...
the problem is in the postgres code and not
in a compile switch or something like that...
I will upgrade all my 8.2 to 8.3... systems
to do this, I build an 8.3 from ground zero,
and than do a rsync from this one to the others,
directories: /usr/obj /usr/src
I've noticed for some time that claws-mail and less (which I think use
libc's regex(3)) don't support word boundaries in searches. I might be
delusional, but I think I've used \b in the past in both of those
applications in FreeBSD.
According to regex(3) it's an implementation POSIX.2, so the
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com writes:
I've noticed for some time that claws-mail and less (which I think use
libc's regex(3)) don't support word boundaries in searches. I might be
delusional, but I think I've used \b in the past in both of those
applications in FreeBSD.
According to
Or expand bionic to full set bsd libc? Thanks for help.
joe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hello all,
I have FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE. Suddenly I can not start my apache webserver
which load php5. The error said, missing libc-client4.so.9.
I checked that libc-client4.so.9 should be in /usr/local/lib but I can not
find it.
How do I get this one?
Best Regards,
Kalpin E. Silaen
On 28/01/2010 10:37, kal...@muliahost.com wrote:
I checked that libc-client4.so.9 should be in /usr/local/lib but I can not
find it.
It's installed by the mail/cclient port, which is a dependency of the
php5-imap module.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil
Am running 6.4-PRERELEASE.
Received FreeBSD-SA-09:07.libc / FreeBSD-SA-09:08.openssl notifications today,
applied applicable patches correctly.
However, now when anyone attempts to connect to my server via SSH, the
connection is closed after they enter their login password.
/var/log
Am running 6.4-PRERELEASE.
Received FreeBSD-SA-09:07.libc / FreeBSD-SA-09:08.openssl notifications
today, applied applicable patches correctly.
However, now when anyone attempts to connect to my server via SSH, the
connection is closed after they enter their login password.
/var/log
Figured it out.
The libc patch instructions don't tell you to rebuild libutil. You need to
do that.
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Jake Evans wrote:
Am running 6.4-PRERELEASE.
Received FreeBSD-SA-09:07.libc / FreeBSD-SA-09:08.openssl notifications
today, applied applicable patches correctly
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 20:11:09 Jake Evans wrote:
Am running 6.4-PRERELEASE.
Received FreeBSD-SA-09:07.libc / FreeBSD-SA-09:08.openssl notifications
today, applied applicable patches correctly.
However, now when anyone attempts to connect to my server via SSH, the
connection is closed
Unga [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How to do regression on libc to verify the correctness?
There are conformance test suites out there.
The decent ones all seem to cost money, but
you might want to look at the Open POSIX
project.
___
freebsd-questions
Hi all
How to do regression on libc to verify the correctness?
Kind regards
Unga
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all
What consists FreeBSD Libc (/lib/libc.so.7)? Is it only /usr/src/lib/libc/* ?
I have compiled /usr/src/lib/libc/*, the resulting libc.so.7 is about 65,000
bytes smaller.
Kind regards
Unga
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Unga wrote:
Hi all
What consists FreeBSD Libc (/lib/libc.so.7)? Is it only /usr/src/lib/libc/* ?
Yes.
I have compiled /usr/src/lib/libc/*, the resulting libc.so.7 is about 65,000
bytes smaller.
Than what? It will change depending on your CFLAGS.
Kris
with the same compiler options and same compiler as used with binary
distribution?
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008, Unga wrote:
Hi all
What consists FreeBSD Libc (/lib/libc.so.7)? Is it only /usr/src/lib/libc/* ?
I have compiled /usr/src/lib/libc/*, the resulting libc.so.7 is about 65,000
bytes
--- On Sun, 6/8/08, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What consists FreeBSD Libc?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Sunday, June 8, 2008, 6:37 PM
Unga wrote:
Hi all
What consists FreeBSD Libc (/lib
Its great to get it confirmed that FreeBSD Libc is only /usr/src/lib/libc/* as
I presumed.
I have compiled and installed the FreeBSD Libc into a temp directory. The size
of /tmp/libc.so.7 is about 65,000 bytes smaller than /lib/libc.so.7.
The /lib/libc.so.7 is dated May 25, 2008. I did
Hi,
I need to know where I can find the full documentation of the last libc
library.
Thanks,
--
Robe.
En el verdadero amor, el alma oculta al cuerpo.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
In the last episode (Dec 20), Robe said:
I need to know where I can find the full documentation of the last
libc library.
Most of the libc documentation should be in /usr/src/lib/libc/ . Any
file ending in .2 or .3 is a manpage. They are also installed in
/usr/share/man and are available
Dear list.
I found a problem with the port named avr-libc. The reason is ... there is one
line of code in the Makefile with the following content:
BROKEN= Does not build
what can be the reason to checkin an intentionally broken makefile, and how can
I use this port again?
thanks
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 07:43:23PM +0300, Ivan Dimitrov wrote:
Dear list.
I found a problem with the port named avr-libc. The reason is ... there is
one line of code in the Makefile with the following content:
BROKEN= Does not build
what can be the reason to checkin
On Saturday 06 October 2007 18:43:23 Ivan Dimitrov wrote:
I found a problem with the port named avr-libc. The reason is ... there is
one line of code in the Makefile with the following content: BROKEN=
Does not build
what can be the reason to checkin an intentionally broken makefile
Greetings,
I am running FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0
I am attempting to upgrade my avr-libc port. (/usr/ports/devel/avr-libc)
pkg_version -v shows:
avr-libc-1.2.5,1 needs updating (port has 1.4.3,1)
Note: all other ports show current except kde related items.
So, I updated my
On Feb 19, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Steve Pauly wrote:
pkg_version -v shows:
avr-libc-1.2.5,1 needs updating (port has
1.4.3,1)
Note: all other ports show current except kde related items.
So, I updated my port collection:
/usr/local/bin/cvsup -L 2 ~/ports-supfile
pkgdb -vF
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:38:15PM -0600, David Kelly wrote:
On Feb 19, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Steve Pauly wrote:
pkg_version -v shows:
avr-libc-1.2.5,1 needs updating (port has
1.4.3,1)
Note: all other ports show current except kde related items.
So, I updated my
Kris,
I added TRYBROKEN= yes
in the Makefile and ran portupgrade avr-libc (getting further than
before) with the following results:
install -o root -g wheel -m 444
/usr/ports/devel/avr-libc/work/avr-libc-1.4.3/LICENSE
/usr/ports/devel/avr-libc/work/avr-libc-1.4.3/AUTHORS
/usr/local
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:27:49AM -0500, Steve Pauly wrote:
Kris,
I added TRYBROKEN= yes
in the Makefile and ran portupgrade avr-libc (getting further than
before) with the following results:
install -o root -g wheel -m 444
/usr/ports/devel/avr-libc/work/avr-libc-1.4.3/LICENSE
Kris,
/usr/local/share/doc/avr-libc is a good directory. Should the
parameter to install be files or directories?
Do you think I should pkg_delete avr-libc ?
Also, avr-libc was built from ports as part of avr-gcc, not that long
ago. The whole install is but a few weeks old.
Thanks
.
- Original Message -
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Steve Pauly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade avr-libc error
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:31:57 -0500
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:27:49AM -0500, Steve Pauly wrote:
Kris,
I added TRYBROKEN= yes
Hi,
Ive been fixing code in /usr/src/lib/libc/rpc and would like to know
where I should address my attention (and code fixes) to.
Thanks,
Damien Miller
=
Sub UNIX lumen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
--
Aluminium Oxide
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 02:14:40PM +1030, Aluminium Oxide wrote:
Hi,
Ive been fixing code in /usr/src/lib/libc/rpc and would like to know
where I should address my attention (and code fixes) to.
There's the freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org list, and you can always
send-pr(1) your patches at any
In the last episode (Jan 02), Aluminium Oxide said:
Ive been fixing code in /usr/src/lib/libc/rpc and would like to know
where I should address my attention (and code fixes) to.
According to src/MAINTAINERS, alfred@ is the go-to guy for rpc code.
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Performing a make install in /usr/src/lib/libc, here's the output :
# make install
install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libc.a /usr/lib
install: libc.a: No such file or directory
*** Error code 71
Stop in /usr/src/lib/libc.
Howerer, when I ll for the file /usr/lib/libc.a in the /usr/lib
In the last episode (Sep 16), Jordan Freeman said:
Performing a make install in /usr/src/lib/libc, here's the output :
# make install
install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libc.a /usr/lib
install: libc.a: No such file or directory
*** Error code 71
Stop in /usr/src/lib/libc.
Howerer
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Sep 16), Jordan Freeman said:
Performing a make install in /usr/src/lib/libc, here's the output :
# make install
install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libc.a /usr/lib
install: libc.a: No such file or directory
*** Error code 71
Stop in /usr/src/lib
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:11:09PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
: I'm sure others can think of more points in support or linking to libc
: and against linking to it :-)
Most of what I want to do is low-level encryption... like copy protection
routines. I love those. So who needs libc
On 2005-08-30 04:29, Jonathon McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm doing some experimentation with assembly code based on the int80h.org
tutorials. But since I am going to use malloc and some other functions,
I need to make my code link with libc rather than stand totally on its own.
ld
need to make my code link with libc rather than stand totally on its own.
:
: ld -s -o foo foo.o -lc
:
: leaves 'environ' and '__progname' undefined. What is the correct way to
link
: standalone asm code with needed libraries?
:
: That depends on what the ``standalone'' code contains. If your
am going to use malloc and some other functions,
I need to make my code link with libc rather than stand totally on its own.
ld -s -o foo foo.o -lc
leaves 'environ' and '__progname' undefined. What is the correct way to
link
standalone asm code with needed libraries?
That depends on what
Hi all,
I'm doing some experimentation with assembly code based on the int80h.org
tutorials. But since I am going to use malloc and some other functions,
I need to make my code link with libc rather than stand totally on its own.
ld -s -o foo foo.o -lc
leaves 'environ' and '__progname
Lo all,
Is there anywhere that I can see what has changed from FreeBSD 4.11 to
FreeBSD 5.x, in regards to libc ?
We are getting major errors and core dumps from one of our applications
which runs flawlessly on 4.x, but just dumps on 5.x, complaining about
__cxa_finalize () from /lib/libc.so
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:39:11PM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:
Lo all,
Is there anywhere that I can see what has changed from FreeBSD 4.11 to
FreeBSD 5.x, in regards to libc ?
The CVS logs are public, e.g. http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/, but there
are literally thousands of changes.
Kris
Hi!
Has anybody an idea where I can fetch:
avr-libc-2003.09.09.tar.bz2
or a package for 5.2.1?
I have installed avrdude, avr-gcc via pkg_add but I'm not successfull
with the libc.
make install says:
Attempting to fetch from http://people.freebsd.org/~joerg/.
fetch: http://people.freebsd.org
On 01/09/05 17:15:40, Florian Hengstberger wrote:
Hi!
Has anybody an idea where I can fetch:
avr-libc-2003.09.09.tar.bz2
or a package for 5.2.1?
I have installed avrdude, avr-gcc via pkg_add but I'm not successfull
with the libc.
make install says:
Attempting to fetch from http
01:27:57 -0700 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've only seen this when something incorrectly links to both libc and
libc_r. Neither of those four binaries should be linked to libc_r at
all though. Can you confirm with ldd(1)?
I have successfully worked around the problem by passing
db 'the number is %d\n',0
mesglen equ $-mesg
errormesg db 'libc error',0ah,0
errormesglenequ $-errormesg
newline db 10
number dw 0x10
kernel:
int 80h
ret
align 4
section .text
global _start
_start
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-03 13:18:58 -0500:
Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just got this failure on a
FreeBSD freepuppy.bellavista.cz 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #3: Tue Aug 26
12:34:53 CEST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEPUPPY2_5 i386
in
Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just got this failure on a
FreeBSD freepuppy.bellavista.cz 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #3: Tue Aug 26
12:34:53 CEST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEPUPPY2_5 i386
in a buildworld of freshly updated /usr/src.
UPDATING,
the message.
what's up?
mklocale -o zh_CN.GB18030.out /usr/src/share/mklocale/zh_CN.GB18030.src
ENCODING GB18030 is not supported by libc
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/share/mklocale.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/share.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src
Hi!
Unfortunatelly I am really new with FBSD... so, I installed a 4.7 and
upgradet with cvsup to 4.9
after this compiled the base system.. the X server and the KDE 3.1.4.
There were some problem during the compile of KDE, and cause of time I
installed from binary...
Now, If I wanna use any
G'day
I've just installed gimp, via the 5.1 distfiles, and get the following error
message;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc.so.5 not found
How would I fix this? - what do I compile etc that will remove this error message?
I did a buildworld a while ago to 4.8
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 23:46:16 +0930
james [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc.so.5 not found
How would I fix this? - what do I compile etc that will remove this
error message?
Sounds like you've installed a 5.x package on a 4.x
G'day
Probably a really stupid question - but is there a compatability port of some
sort for 4.x systems so we can run things compiled for 5.x ? :-)
regards
james
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 16:40:30 +0200, Miguel Mendez wrote
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 23:46:16 +0930
james [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Probably a really stupid question - but is there a compatability port of
some sort for 4.x systems so we can run things compiled for 5.x ? :-)
No, but you can go the other way around. You MIGHT be able to use the 5.x
libc directly on 4.x, but I wouldn't recommend it.
Ken
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 00:16:59 +0930
james [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Probably a really stupid question - but is there a compatability port
of some sort for 4.x systems so we can run things compiled for 5.x ?
:-)
I fail to see how that could be useful, even if it worked. You can build
ports
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:16:59AM +0930, james wrote:
G'day
Probably a really stupid question - but is there a compatability port of some
sort for 4.x systems so we can run things compiled for 5.x ? :-)
Why do you think you need this? The same packages are provided for 4.x systems.
Kris
No you can't - it relies on the 5.1 kernel.
OK, well I wasn't sure how much things had changed as far as the ABI goes,
so I didn't want to rule it out.
Ken
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Why does the program below produce radically different results when
linked either (a) with just the libc on FreeBSD 4.7 or else (b) with
the BIND library (libbind.a) from the ISC 8.x.x BIND release, and then
with libc?
Is FreeBSD's gethostbyaddr(3) mishandling the classless in-addr.arpa
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 02:12:06PM -0700, Quinlan, Gerald F wrote:
We are looking to acquire or develop the capability to test for proper or
expected results for each LIBC function. Your help is appreciated.
FreeBSD doesn't include anything comprehensive, except for a few
regression tests
We have acquired a copy of Version 4.7 of freeBSD on CD-ROM and are
searching for a way to test the libc functions. The LSB-VSX test suite from
The Open Group does not appear to meet our needs. Do you have any other
suggestions? Thanks for your help.
Gerry Quinlan
SNL Department 9224
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:50:32AM -0700, Quinlan, Gerald F wrote:
We have acquired a copy of Version 4.7 of freeBSD on CD-ROM and are
searching for a way to test the libc functions. The LSB-VSX test suite from
The Open Group does not appear to meet our needs. Do you have any other
We are looking to acquire or develop the capability to test for proper or
expected results for each LIBC function. Your help is appreciated.
Gerry Quinlan
SNL Department 9224 Scalable Systems Integration
Phone 505-844-6568
Fax 505-845-7442
-Original Message-
From: Kris Kennaway
compatibility was wrong, sorry.
What I wanted to say was that the binary interfaces become incompatible
and compatibility is provided via COMPAT_ options in the kernel or by
packages containing old versions of librairies. So I really don't think
that it's possible to run an old binary against a new libc
. So I really don't think
that it's possible to run an old binary against a new libc (at least,
the sonames wold probably mismatch). Why would otherwise the compat
packages in pkgsrc exist? Please correct me if I am wrong.
the compat packages exist to provide missing libraries. the netbsd
Hello,
some notes about NetBSD libc:
it supports nsswitch for a long time, see here:
http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?nsswitch.conf++NetBSD-current
Dynamically loaded NSS modules are not supported.
To David Brownlee: I doubt NetBSD 1.0 binary could run against
a NetBSD 1.6 libc
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 06:41:27PM +0100, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
And, if there are things like funopen(), why do Gnome hackers invent
their own APIs like gnome-vfs? Does somebody actually use funopen()?
Does it really work?
They presumably did it because they thought it would be a good idea.
Pavel Cahyna [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 23.01.03 19:14:41:
To David Brownlee: I doubt NetBSD 1.0 binary could run against
a NetBSD 1.6 libc. They don't care much about binary compatibility. You
could not even run a statically linked 1.0 app without some COMPAT_
option in the kernel, I
To David Brownlee: I doubt NetBSD 1.0 binary could run against
a NetBSD 1.6 libc. They don't care much about binary compatibility. You
could not even run a statically linked 1.0 app without some COMPAT_
option in the kernel, I think.
when making such assertions it helps
They presumably did it because they thought it would be a good idea.
Perhaps they wanted to hide implementation differences between
different OSes. Either way, the low-level functions in FreeBSD work
just fine.
FWIW, i just ran man funopen on my netbsd box and it says:
HISTORY
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
i understood him this way: glibcs *portability* is large, since
it is not only portabel over several archs but also over several
kernels.
bsds libc is less portable (only accross different archs) so its
portability is smaller
Hello,
I am trying to study the various functionalities
supported by glibc Vs presence or absence of those
features in BSD libc.
This information here is w.r.t BSD libc which is
supplied with FreeBSD4.6(on intel)
i would like to know if i am missing something or some
information is not accurate
In the last episode (Jan 20), Atifa Kheel said:
e)Other Streams(like string streams,Obstack streams,etc)
glibc: Supported
BSD libc: Not Supported.
BSD supports funopen() which allows the user to create handles for
arbitrary stream types.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=funopen
may agree, however, this does not speak to the
size of the generated binary, which seems to me to be what you are
referring to.
i understood him this way: glibcs *portability* is large, since
it is not only portabel over several archs but also over several
kernels.
bsds libc is less portable
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 10:31:31AM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
System database and name service switch(NSS)
glibc: Supported
BSD libc: NSS not supported.Incompatible shadow and password support and ancient
utmp.
(Problem Solved by writing a library libshadow)
User applications should
of the world.
19.
Extended Characters
glibc: Supported
BSD libc: No multi-byte character set functions.Breaks building UTF(Unicode) support
in libncurses.
wide character support is present in 5.0.
Kris
msg16121/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
i want use BSD libc on my linux system.
i want to know from where i can download the source
and if any documentation on this is available,like the
features it supports etc??
thanx in advance
Atifa
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Atifa Kheel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Hello,
i want use BSD libc on my linux system.
i want to know from where i can download the source
and if any documentation on this is available,like the
features it supports etc??
FreeBSD is a complete system, not a collection
Hi
In order to have nss_ldap to work on FreeBSD
I've read it would be necessary to recompile
the libc with the BIND IRS.
Does some guru could explain how to do such
thing and does anybody has done this with success ?
The goal is to have LDAP auth to work on FreeBSD
which is not the case
I believe that one of my machines has a hardware problem that
occasionally corrupts disk writes.
As luck would have it, I also suspect that my /usr/lib/libc.so.4
became corrupt during my last buildworld a few days ago.
I now get 'internal compiler errors' whenever I try to compile any
program
96 matches
Mail list logo
