from Ewald Jenisch a...@jenisch.at:
I'm trying to get my system up2date using portupgrade as usual.
However during the upgrade process I ran into a problem during upgrade
of yelp:
=== yelp-2.30.2_4 depends on package: libxul2 - not found
=== Found libxul-10.0.10, but you need to upgrade
Hi,
I'm trying to get my system up2date using portupgrade as usual.
However during the upgrade process I ran into a problem during upgrade
of yelp:
=== yelp-2.30.2_4 depends on package: libxul2 - not found
=== Found libxul-10.0.10, but you need to upgrade to libxul2.
UPDATING has an entry
On Saturday 18 August 2012 21:16:09 Antonio Olivares wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, ajtiM lum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
There are vulnerabilities in libxul-1.9.2 very long time and looks like
nothing is better. Are there a new libxul version somewhere to download,
please
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, ajtiM wrote:
On Saturday 18 August 2012 21:16:09 Antonio Olivares wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, ajtiM lum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
There are vulnerabilities in libxul-1.9.2 very long time and looks like
nothing is better. Are there a new libxul version somewhere
Hi!
There are vulnerabilities in libxul-1.9.2 very long time and looks like
nothing is better. Are there a new libxul version somewhere to download,
please?
portaudit -Fda
auditfile.tbz 100% of 79 kB 316 kBps
New database installed.
Database created: Sat
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, ajtiM lum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
There are vulnerabilities in libxul-1.9.2 very long time and looks like
nothing is better. Are there a new libxul version somewhere to download,
please?
portaudit -Fda
auditfile.tbz 100
Hello!
It seems I can't build www/libxul from a freshly updated ports tree on
my 9.0-STABLE amd64 system. No matter how I try, the build ends with
sed: /usr/ports/www/libxul/work/mozilla-1.9.2/build/unix/*.pc: No such
file or directory.
I have commented out entire /etc/make.conf except
During a ports upgrade, I had an upgrade from libxul also.
this took quite a long time to build and used lots of CPU power and made
response time slow ...
just for curiosity, I checked
# pkg_info | grep libxul
libxul-1.9.2.27 Mozilla runtime package that can be used to bootstrap
XUL+X
At 02:54 22/10/2011, Joe Altman wrote:
Greetings...
I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox
3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and
therefore deprecated while FF7 was recommended and secure.
My questions:
1) is the dependency libxul
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:32:47 +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:
As far as i know, the libxul port is inside ff3. Installing libxul
doesn't install ff3, only libxul. Perhaps it's an old libxul and the
newr one is inside ff7, so libxul port should point there, don't know that.
I'm not sure
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:45:11 +0200
Polytropon articulated:
I'm not sure if it still applies, but in earlier Firefox
version transitions (and the consideration of dependencies)
some programs depending on libxul would install an outdated
Firefox version. The solution has been WITH_GECKO=libxul
On Oct 22, 2011, at 2:54 AM, Joe Altman wrote:
Greetings...
I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox
3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and
therefore deprecated while FF7 was recommended and secure.
My questions:
1
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 09:28:40PM +0200, Beat G?tzi wrote:
On Oct 22, 2011, at 2:54 AM, Joe Altman wrote:
Greetings...
I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox
3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and
therefore deprecated
Greetings...
I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox
3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and
therefore deprecated while FF7 was recommended and secure.
My questions:
1) is the dependency libxul has for FF3 a security problem?
2
Hello.
A week ago the portaudit alert came for mozilla products. I updated
www/firefox36 and mail/thunderbird3 ports but still no www/libxul in the
ports.
I suppose I need the 1.9.2.23 version:
http://portaudit.freebsd.org/1fade8a3-e9e8-11e0-9580-4061862b8c22.html
But I can't even find
...@predatorlabs.net
Cc: User Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libxul compilation problem
2010/10/16 Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net:
2010/10/16 Fernando Apestegu=EDa fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com:
I didn't run X or whatsoever. That's why I think I should have enough me=
mory
2010/10/17 Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net:
2010/10/17 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com:
The machine has one single core cpu. Finally I was able to compile the
thing, compiling
the offending file by hand (nsHtml5ElementName.cpp) without the -O2
optimization flag.
With
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:28:15 +0200
From: Fernando_Apesteguia fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: libxul compilation problem
I still refuse to think 1GB is low ;) though I could be wrong.
One gig of RAM is not the problem. 1.25 gig total of VM _is_.
I have some stuff I run
2010/10/16 Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net:
2010/10/16 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com:
I didn't run X or whatsoever. That's why I think I should have enough memory.
In fact after getting that error, I rebooted so I could update the
ports from a fresh
running system
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun Oct 17 11:46:48 2010
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:47:09 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com
To: Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net
Cc: User Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libxul
2010/10/17 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com:
The machine has one single core cpu. Finally I was able to compile the
thing, compiling
the offending file by hand (nsHtml5ElementName.cpp) without the -O2
optimization flag.
With this flag, cc1plus eats up all the memory of my
2010/10/15 Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net:
2010/10/15 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com:
The process being killed is cc1plus while compiling libxul. I'm
running a stock 8.1-RELEASE GENERIC kernel on amd64 platform.
The machine has 1Gb of physical memory and 256MB for swap
2010/10/16 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com:
I didn't run X or whatsoever. That's why I think I should have enough memory.
In fact after getting that error, I rebooted so I could update the
ports from a fresh
running system (nothing cached or so). But even in that case, I'm
): failed
swap_pager_getswapspace(12): failed
...
...
swap_pager_getswapspace(3): failed
swap_pager_getswapspace(3): failed
The process being killed is cc1plus while compiling libxul. I'm
running a stock 8.1-RELEASE GENERIC kernel on amd64 platform.
The machine has 1Gb of physical memory and 256MB
2010/10/15 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com:
The process being killed is cc1plus while compiling libxul. I'm
running a stock 8.1-RELEASE GENERIC kernel on amd64 platform.
The machine has 1Gb of physical memory and 256MB for swap (I have had
this setup for quite a long time
keneasson wrote:
Can anyone help me get my system back up and running?
make.conf looks like this:
WITH_MYSQL_VER=51
APACHE_VERSION=22
OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8
WWWDIR = /web/phpmyadmin
WITH_CUPS=yes
CUPS_OVERWRITE_BASE=true
#NO_LPR=true
USE_GECKO=libxul
^
This is your
Hello,
I'm running Freebsd 8.0-Stable #9 Dec 17/09 on amd64. I'm running gnome, and at
the time i started my update i was at Gnome 2.26
I went through UPDATING and tried to switch from firefox 2 which is marked
ignore to libxul by changing WITH_GECKO=libxul removed firefox3 and installed
Hello,
I'm running Freebsd 8.0-Stable #9 Dec 17/09 on amd64. I'm running gnome, and at
the time i started my update i was at Gnome 2.26
I went through UPDATING and tried to switch from firefox 2 which is marked
ignore to libxul by changing WITH_GECKO=libxul removed firefox3 and installed
/local/etc/pkgtools.conf . Now I'm trying to portupgrade
mplayer-plugin, it also tried to build firefox 2. I tried
www/mplayer-plugin = WITH_GECKO=xulrunner,
but that gave an error message (xulrunner isn't an option). So, I tried
www/mplayer-plugin = WITH_GECKO=libxul
, it also tried to build firefox 2. I tried
www/mplayer-plugin = WITH_GECKO=xulrunner,
but that gave an error message (xulrunner isn't an option). So, I tried
www/mplayer-plugin = WITH_GECKO=libxul,
then:
=== libxul-1.9.0.7_3 conflicts with installed package(s):
xulrunner
in pkgtools.conf with
libxul. Then, you can:
portupgrade -f -r -o www/libxul xulrunner
--
Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz
--
Opportunities are seldom labeled
to portupgrade
mplayer-plugin, it also tried to build firefox 2. I tried
Do a 'make config' in graphic/librsvg2 and disable the mozilla plugin
option. It's not needed for firefox3 -- at least firefox is still happily
rendering SVG content for me -- and it gets rid of the libxul vs. xulrunner
thing
32 matches
Mail list logo
