> "AK" == Alex Kiesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AK> On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 04:25, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
>> Alex Kiesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I've not been able to run acroread or sybase-11.0.3 with linux-base-7.
>>
>> You might have better luck with acroread4 or acroread5
On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 04:25, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
> Alex Kiesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've not been able to run acroread or sybase-11.0.3 with linux-base-7.
>
> You might have better luck with acroread4 or acroread5.
I had, but I wanted to run acroread5.
> Of those two, I find
Alex Kiesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've not been able to run acroread or sybase-11.0.3 with linux-base-7.
You might have better luck with acroread4 or acroread5.
Of those two, I find only acroread4 works on my linux-base-7.1, but from
the error message, it looks like it didn't like my OS
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 18:20, Fernan Aguero wrote:
> Now many ports have their dependencies listed as
> linux_base-7.1 or something similar. This means that my
> linux-compatibility tree got updated when I installed some
> of this ports? or should I do this
> manually by going to /usr/ports/emulato
I have recently finished a clean installation of
FreeBSD-4.6.2. Since I run linux binaries I chose to install
the linux-compatibility packages from the install media.
This currently is linux_base-6, if I read it right.
Now many ports have their dependencies listed as
linux_base-7.1 or something s
