Re: make.conf Question

2006-01-22 Thread Chris
On 22/01/06, Adam Stroud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All: I have been playing around with make.conf and I see that it is possible to to use the NO_OPENSSH variable to not build openssh when updating fbsd from source. I also noticed in the /etc/defaults/rc.conf file that there is a

make.conf Question

2006-01-21 Thread Adam Stroud
All: I have been playing around with make.conf and I see that it is possible to to use the NO_OPENSSH variable to not build openssh when updating fbsd from source. I also noticed in the /etc/defaults/rc.conf file that there is a sshd_program entry that can be used to adjust where the

Re: make.conf Question

2006-01-21 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Jan 21, 2006, at 4:54 PM, Adam Stroud wrote: All: I have been playing around with make.conf and I see that it is possible to to use the NO_OPENSSH variable to not build openssh when updating fbsd from source. I also noticed in the /etc/defaults/rc.conf file that there is a

make.conf - question

2005-10-31 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Hello, where can I found ALL parameters suited for /etc/make.conf ? For example, I wanted install some software from ports without X11, but man 5 make.conf doesn`t include WITHOUT_X11 option. Fortunatelly I found this page http://www.gsp.com/cgi-bin/man.cgi?section=5topic=make.conf and

Re: make.conf - question

2005-10-31 Thread Andrew P.
On 10/31/05, Vladimir Dvorak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, where can I found ALL parameters suited for /etc/make.conf ? For example, I wanted install some software from ports without X11, but man 5 make.conf doesn`t include WITHOUT_X11 option. Fortunatelly I found this page

Re: make.conf - question

2005-10-31 Thread Glenn Dawson
At 01:53 AM 10/31/2005, Vladimir Dvorak wrote: Hello, where can I found ALL parameters suited for /etc/make.conf ? For example, I wanted install some software from ports without X11, but man 5 make.conf doesn`t include WITHOUT_X11 option. Fortunatelly I found this page

Re: make.conf question

2005-04-12 Thread Piotr Gnyp
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 02:05:00PM +0200, Piotr Gnyp wrote: # certain code (currently only OpenSSL) as well as modifying the value ^^ It does exactly what it says it does. What is your confusion? My

make.conf question

2005-04-11 Thread Piotr Gnyp
Hi. My 4.11 boxes: uname -r 4.11-RELEASE-p1 CPU: 1. CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2392.30-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf27 Stepping = 7 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,

Re: make.conf question

2005-04-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 11:27:22AM +0200, Piotr Gnyp wrote: Hi. My 4.11 boxes: uname -r 4.11-RELEASE-p1 CPU: 1. CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2392.30-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf27 Stepping = 7

Re: make.conf question

2005-04-11 Thread Piotr Gnyp
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The version of gcc that comes with FreeBSD 4.x can't do better than this, i.e. it doesn't know about optimizations for newer CPUs. In practise this isn't important. Ok, so why this: # The CPUTYPE variable controls which processor should

Re: make.conf question

2005-04-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 02:05:00PM +0200, Piotr Gnyp wrote: # The CPUTYPE variable controls which processor should be targeted for # generated code. This controls processor-specific optimizations in # certain code (currently only OpenSSL) as well as modifying the value # of CFLAGS to

make.conf question

2004-10-24 Thread NetAdmin
I have a P4 2.4G Intel proc on an Asus P4S533 motherboard running FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p17. /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh is showing Release now and not RC1 so I thought I'd give it a shot. I'm trying to figure out what are the best/appropriate flags to use in /etc/make.conf I had the

Re: make.conf question

2004-10-24 Thread Michael Johnson
make.conf(5) has some info for you Michael On Oct 24, 2004, at 2:30 PM, NetAdmin wrote: I have a P4 2.4G Intel proc on an Asus P4S533 motherboard running FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p17. /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh is showing Release now and not RC1 so I thought I'd give it a shot. I'm trying to

Re: make.conf question

2004-10-24 Thread Subhro
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:30:51 -0400, NetAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip How does one know what flags to use in /etc/make.conf? I thought I had the right ones. The right one is very much relative to the user and the purpose of the system. For example on a development system I would enable

make.conf question

2003-08-26 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi! 1) Can I put any make option into make.conf that can be applied to ports (like inmake WITH_CALENDAR=yes install clean) or is this restricted to system ressources? 2) If yes - would this be advisable? - Or is there a big chance to produce some sort of mess? 3) Is make.conf

Re: make.conf question

2003-08-26 Thread Andrey Simonenko
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:41:34 + (UTC) in lucky.freebsd.questions, Peter Ulrich Kruppa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! 1) Can I put any make option into make.conf that can be applied to ports (like inmake WITH_CALENDAR=yes install clean) or is this restricted to system

Re: make.conf question

2003-08-26 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:54:25PM +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) Can I put any make option into make.conf that can be applied to ports (like in make WITH_CALENDAR=yes install clean) or is this restricted to system ressources? Yes, you can put ports