On Wednesday 16 October 2002 04:20, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Andy Knapp wrote:
>
> No, on our servers I disabled APM by default because it triggered trouble
> in the past on several SMP machines. And why APM on every-time-up servers?
> No, definitely no APM facilities in kernel o
:>Cc: 'Tom Snell'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:>Subject: RE: microuptime() went backwards, FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE
:>
:>
:>On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Andy Knapp wrote:
:>
:>This machine has a highly customized kernel ...
:>
:>:>I've actually had this problem before, and I am pr
'Tom Snell'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: microuptime() went backwards, FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Andy Knapp wrote:
This machine has a highly customized kernel ...
:>I've actually had this problem before, and I am pretty sure that it is
a :>problem with t
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Snell
:>Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:27 PM
:>To: Hartmann, O.; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:>Subject: Re: microuptime() went backwards, FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE
:>
:>
:>Hartmann, O. wrote:
:>
:>>Hello.
:>&
ED]
Subject: Re: microuptime() went backwards, FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE
Hartmann, O. wrote:
>Hello.
>
>Is this subject of a bug report?
>
>While calculating numerical simulations and heavy load one of our P4
>systems showed up this:
>microuptime() went backwards (57243.730002 -> 5
Hartmann, O. wrote:
>Hello.
>
>Is this subject of a bug report?
>
>While calculating numerical simulations and heavy load one of our
>P4 systems showed up this:
>microuptime() went backwards (57243.730002 -> 57243.730001)
>
>dmesgout of the system follows as attachment.
>
>
>--
>MfG
>O. Hartmann
Hello.
Is this subject of a bug report?
While calculating numerical simulations and heavy load one of our
P4 systems showed up this:
microuptime() went backwards (57243.730002 -> 57243.730001)
dmesgout of the system follows as attachment.
--
MfG
O. Hartmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]