Re: more transparent proxy and squid questions.

2003-06-17 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-06-17 14:37:09 +1000: further, if i do try and configure with the --enable-ipfw-transparent option, configure complains with the following: checking if setresuid is implemented... yes checking if IP-Filter header files are installed... no WARNING: Cannot find

Re: more transparent proxy and squid questions.

2003-06-16 Thread Andrew Thomson
i'm still having issues here.. has anyone else got transparent proxy going with firewall and squid on different boxes?? anyway, from the squid faq, does this apply to freebsd these days?? ...Compile and run a version of Squid which accepts connections for other addresses. For some operating

RE: more transparent proxy and squid questions.

2003-06-16 Thread Doron Shmaryahu
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Thomson Sent: 16 June 2003 08:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: more transparent proxy and squid questions. i'm still having issues here.. has anyone else got transparent proxy going with firewall and squid on different boxes?? anyway, from the squid

Re: more transparent proxy and squid questions.

2003-06-16 Thread Andrew Thomson
further, if i do try and configure with the --enable-ipfw-transparent option, configure complains with the following: checking if setresuid is implemented... yes checking if IP-Filter header files are installed... no WARNING: Cannot find necessary IP-Filter header files Transparent Proxy

Re: more transparent proxy and squid questions.

2003-06-15 Thread Andrew Thomson
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:47:09AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: Yes. You've got the right idea. hmm.. i have encountered some difficulties ;) so now i'm seeking some more advice.. i have the following rules on my firewall: 10561 skipto 11000 ip from 192.168.1.2 to any 10562 fwd

Re: more transparent proxy and squid questions.

2003-06-15 Thread Bill Moran
Andrew Thomson wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:47:09AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: Yes. You've got the right idea. hmm.. i have encountered some difficulties ;) so now i'm seeking some more advice.. i have the following rules on my firewall: 10561 skipto 11000 ip from 192.168.1.2 to any 10562

Re: more transparent proxy and squid questions.

2003-06-15 Thread Rapier
From what you've said you have natd enabled,instead of redirecting with ipfw you shoud redirect with natd!man natd On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:41:05 +1000 Andrew Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:47:09AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: Yes. You've got the right

more transparent proxy and squid questions.

2003-06-13 Thread Andrew Thomson
I'm not looking for help at setting this up as such, but rather a better understanding of what's happening to the packets in this situation. I have a freebsd firewall/gateway box. I then fwd the port 80 requests to the squid box on port 3128 squid then i imagine process the request.. does squid

Re: more transparent proxy and squid questions.

2003-06-13 Thread Andrew Thomson
oh, and does squid need to be compiled with CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-ipf-transparent given the firewall does the divert to the squid box ?? ta, ajt. On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 05:04:38PM +1000, Andrew Thomson wrote: I'm not looking for help at setting this up as such, but rather a better

RE: more transparent proxy and squid questions.

2003-06-13 Thread Doron Shmaryahu
] Subject: Re: more transparent proxy and squid questions. oh, and does squid need to be compiled with CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-ipf-transparent given the firewall does the divert to the squid box ?? ta, ajt. On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 05:04:38PM +1000, Andrew Thomson wrote: I'm not looking for help

Re: more transparent proxy and squid questions.

2003-06-13 Thread Bill Moran
Andrew Thomson wrote: I'm not looking for help at setting this up as such, but rather a better understanding of what's happening to the packets in this situation. I have a freebsd firewall/gateway box. I then fwd the port 80 requests to the squid box on port 3128 squid then i imagine process the