Re: nForce4-SLI, AHCI and NCQ and FreeBSD 6.0

2005-09-23 Thread O. Hartmann

jason wrote:

O. Hartmann wrote:


Hello.
I have a little question about the popular nForce4-SLI chipset for the 
Socket 939 platform. The onboard SATA controller of the nForce4-SLI 
chipset claims to be NCQ (or SATA II) capable, but nVidia implemented 
this feature in a not-AHCI-standardised way, but as an own solution. 
My question is: Is the FBSD 6.X driver for the nForce4-SLI chipset 
capable of using NCQ (as I know, the driver has to enable NCQ and it's 
not done automatically by the harddrive-controller interaction).


Thanks in advance,
Oliver
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Regaurdless of what the motherboard manufacturer says a SilI3114 SATA 
controller is SATA spec 1.0.


Yes , that is exactly what I got from http://www.siliconimage.com/.

Every report I read about ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe/Premium gave the same 
technical specs: the second RAID5-capable SATA chip (SilI3114) is 
attached to the 32Bit bus (*NOT* PCIe). Also, there is *NO* 64Bit bus on 
any of the mentioned mainboards!


And, by the way, the nForce4-SLI MCP is capable of NCQ, but the 
capability is *NOT* AHCI conform, so it seemes to me that we need a 
special treatment using this add on - but we all know how restricted 
nVidia is offering internal details about their chipset to open source 
projects like FreeBSD.


This is what I found out searching the net, some articles and watching 
this list.

Oliver
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: nForce4-SLI, AHCI and NCQ and FreeBSD 6.0

2005-09-23 Thread Malachi de Ælfweald
We found an Asus support page saying that you have to run the hitachi
software to enable the 3Gb/sec on the drives. I did that, and it said the
motherboard was not compatible.

I called Asus -- and they confirmed what you have been saying. The Si3114
supports RAID5 and the nVidia SATAII -- which is unfortunate, because I
bought the motherboard based on their false advertisements.

I am in the process of switching the drives over to the nVidia controller
now.

Malachi

On 9/23/05, O. Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 jason wrote:
  O. Hartmann wrote:
 
  Hello.
  I have a little question about the popular nForce4-SLI chipset for the
  Socket 939 platform. The onboard SATA controller of the nForce4-SLI
  chipset claims to be NCQ (or SATA II) capable, but nVidia implemented
  this feature in a not-AHCI-standardised way, but as an own solution.
  My question is: Is the FBSD 6.X driver for the nForce4-SLI chipset
  capable of using NCQ (as I know, the driver has to enable NCQ and it's
  not done automatically by the harddrive-controller interaction).
 
  Thanks in advance,
  Oliver
  ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Regaurdless of what the motherboard manufacturer says a SilI3114 SATA
  controller is SATA spec 1.0.

 Yes , that is exactly what I got from http://www.siliconimage.com/.

 Every report I read about ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe/Premium gave the same
 technical specs: the second RAID5-capable SATA chip (SilI3114) is
 attached to the 32Bit bus (*NOT* PCIe). Also, there is *NO* 64Bit bus on
 any of the mentioned mainboards!

 And, by the way, the nForce4-SLI MCP is capable of NCQ, but the
 capability is *NOT* AHCI conform, so it seemes to me that we need a
 special treatment using this add on - but we all know how restricted
 nVidia is offering internal details about their chipset to open source
 projects like FreeBSD.

 This is what I found out searching the net, some articles and watching
 this list.
 Oliver
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: nForce4-SLI, AHCI and NCQ and FreeBSD 6.0

2005-09-22 Thread Malachi de Ælfweald
Asus's site seems to be down right now but at least Google caches it...

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:CG_qYngXXLYJ:usa.asus.com/products/mb/socket939/a8nsli-p/overview.htm+a8n+sli+premium+site:asus.comhl=en
 It could very well be marketing hype. All I know is that one of the selling
points I chose it on was: SATA 3Gb/s (on that page)
site and manual both say that the Si3114 supports 3Gb/sec, but they don't
say that about the nVidia, which is why I was choosing it.
I am not sure why it would be via the PCI32 bus... checking this page (
http://www.buzzsurf.com/speed/) it says that a PCI 64-bit bus running at
66MHz would be 4Gb/sec maybe they reserved the pciE for the SLI?
 As far as the performance, the manual says that the performance of raid 5
is greatly affected by block size.. from what I have seen online it has to
do with whether the files being written are big enough to end up striped.
Maybe the 10Mb/s is with a very large block size and very small files? Maybe
a 4k block size and larger files would do better? Just guessing here, really
not sure.
 As far as why I chose the Premium instead of the Deluxe (for my Windows
workstation and my FreeBSD server), there were a few reasons. The
workstation primarily because it allows software-controlled flipping between
SLI and non-SLI, which I thought would be nice if I were to accidentally
play games. For the server, I was going to go with a different board, but it
didn't support RAID5, so I switched to this one.
 Of course, now I am seeing that RAID5 doesn't appear very realistic with
FreeBSD :(
 Malachi

 On 9/8/05, O. Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello.
 Are you really sure the onboard Sil SATA controller supports SATA II?
 When I studied the handbook of both motherboards, the A8N-SLI Deluxe and
 A8N-SLI Premium I found both motherboards are idetically equipted with
 the *not* SATA II capable SilI3114 SATA controller. By the way, as I
 know, the second SATA controller is attached via the PCI32 bus, not via
 PCIe! That means (in my opinion) there is no benefit using this
 controller. It is more a marketing GAG than a serious add-on.

 RAID5 performance of ICH7R and SilI is said to be very, very poor (about
 10 MB/s read/write performance), so what benefit I do have using this
 controller with it's senseless 'capabilities' and non-PCIe attachment?

 This is only a thought based on my personal available informations and
 maybe wrong ...

 Oliver

 Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
  I have noticed the same thing with the onboard Silicon Image controller.
  I am using the A8N-SLI Premium. I am using the Silicon Image controller
  instead of the nForce4 controller because it specifically said SATAII
  and said it supported RAID5 (whereas the nForce did not support RAID5).
  However, on boot it recognizes it as SATA150 (which should be SATA300).
 
  Malachi
 
  On 9/6/05, *O. Hartmann* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hello.
  I have a little question about the popular nForce4-SLI chipset for the
  Socket 939 platform. The onboard SATA controller of the nForce4-SLI
  chipset claims to be NCQ (or SATA II) capable, but nVidia implemented
  this feature in a not-AHCI-standardised way, but as an own solution. My
  question is: Is the FBSD 6.X driver for the nForce4-SLI chipset capable
  of using NCQ (as I know, the driver has to enable NCQ and it's not done
  automatically by the harddrive-controller interaction).
 
  Thanks in advance,
  Oliver
  ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
  mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: nForce4-SLI, AHCI and NCQ and FreeBSD 6.0

2005-09-22 Thread jason

O. Hartmann wrote:


Hello.
I have a little question about the popular nForce4-SLI chipset for the 
Socket 939 platform. The onboard SATA controller of the nForce4-SLI 
chipset claims to be NCQ (or SATA II) capable, but nVidia implemented 
this feature in a not-AHCI-standardised way, but as an own solution. 
My question is: Is the FBSD 6.X driver for the nForce4-SLI chipset 
capable of using NCQ (as I know, the driver has to enable NCQ and it's 
not done automatically by the harddrive-controller interaction).


Thanks in advance,
Oliver
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Regaurdless of what the motherboard manufacturer says a SilI3114 SATA 
controller is SATA spec 1.0.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: nForce4-SLI, AHCI and NCQ and FreeBSD 6.0

2005-09-08 Thread O. Hartmann

Hello.
Are you really sure the onboard Sil SATA controller supports SATA II? 
When I studied the handbook of both motherboards, the A8N-SLI Deluxe and 
A8N-SLI Premium I found both motherboards are idetically equipted with 
the *not* SATA II capable SilI3114 SATA controller. By the way, as I 
know, the second SATA controller is attached via the PCI32 bus, not via 
PCIe! That means (in my opinion) there is no benefit using this 
controller. It is more a marketing GAG than a serious add-on.


RAID5 performance of ICH7R and SilI is said to be very, very poor (about 
10 MB/s read/write performance), so what benefit I do have using this 
controller with it's senseless 'capabilities' and non-PCIe attachment?


This is only a thought based on my personal available informations and 
maybe wrong ...


Oliver

Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
I have noticed the same thing with the onboard Silicon Image controller. 
I am using the A8N-SLI Premium. I am using the Silicon Image controller 
instead of the nForce4 controller because it specifically said SATAII 
and said it supported RAID5 (whereas the nForce did not support RAID5). 
However, on boot it recognizes it as SATA150 (which should be SATA300).


Malachi

On 9/6/05, *O. Hartmann* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hello.
I have a little question about the popular nForce4-SLI chipset for the
Socket 939 platform. The onboard SATA controller of the nForce4-SLI
chipset claims to be NCQ (or SATA II) capable, but nVidia implemented
this feature in a not-AHCI-standardised way, but as an own solution. My
question is: Is the FBSD 6.X driver for the nForce4-SLI chipset capable
of using NCQ (as I know, the driver has to enable NCQ and it's not done
automatically by the harddrive-controller interaction).

Thanks in advance,
Oliver
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


nForce4-SLI, AHCI and NCQ and FreeBSD 6.0

2005-09-06 Thread O. Hartmann

Hello.
I have a little question about the popular nForce4-SLI chipset for the 
Socket 939 platform. The onboard SATA controller of the nForce4-SLI 
chipset claims to be NCQ (or SATA II) capable, but nVidia implemented 
this feature in a not-AHCI-standardised way, but as an own solution. My 
question is: Is the FBSD 6.X driver for the nForce4-SLI chipset capable 
of using NCQ (as I know, the driver has to enable NCQ and it's not done 
automatically by the harddrive-controller interaction).


Thanks in advance,
Oliver
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: nForce4-SLI, AHCI and NCQ and FreeBSD 6.0

2005-09-06 Thread Malachi de Ælfweald
I have noticed the same thing with the onboard Silicon Image controller. I 
am using the A8N-SLI Premium. I am using the Silicon Image controller 
instead of the nForce4 controller because it specifically said SATAII and 
said it supported RAID5 (whereas the nForce did not support RAID5). However, 
on boot it recognizes it as SATA150 (which should be SATA300).

Malachi

On 9/6/05, O. Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hello.
 I have a little question about the popular nForce4-SLI chipset for the
 Socket 939 platform. The onboard SATA controller of the nForce4-SLI
 chipset claims to be NCQ (or SATA II) capable, but nVidia implemented
 this feature in a not-AHCI-standardised way, but as an own solution. My
 question is: Is the FBSD 6.X driver for the nForce4-SLI chipset capable
 of using NCQ (as I know, the driver has to enable NCQ and it's not done
 automatically by the harddrive-controller interaction).
 
 Thanks in advance,
 Oliver
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]