Re: nat and firewall

2008-10-03 Thread Dominique Goncalves
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:24 AM, fire jotawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Dominique Goncalves > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:09 AM, fire jotawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Kevin Kinse

Re: nat and firewall

2008-10-02 Thread fire jotawski
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Dominique Goncalves < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:09 AM, fire jotawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> FBSD1 wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> natd_enable="YES"

Re: nat and firewall

2008-10-02 Thread n j
>> This is no longer true; he did indeed find "firewall_nat_enable" >> in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. The knob seems to have first appeared >> in February in HEAD and I'm guessing it cues the system to use a >> new kernel-based nat rather than natd(8), but I've not read anything >> further about this,

Re: nat and firewall

2008-10-02 Thread Dominique Goncalves
Hi, On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:09 AM, fire jotawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> FBSD1 wrote: >> >>> >>> natd_enable="YES" This statement in rc.conf enables ipfw nated function. >>> firewall_nat_enable="YES" This is an

Re: nat and firewall

2008-10-01 Thread fire jotawski
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FBSD1 wrote: > >> >> natd_enable="YES" This statement in rc.conf enables ipfw nated function. >> firewall_nat_enable="YES" This is an invalid statement. No such thing as >> you have here. >> > > This is no longer true; h

Re: nat and firewall

2008-09-24 Thread Kevin Kinsey
FBSD1 wrote: natd_enable="YES" This statement in rc.conf enables ipfw nated function. firewall_nat_enable="YES" This is an invalid statement. No such thing as you have here. This is no longer true; he did indeed find "firewall_nat_enable" in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. The knob seems to have fir

Re: nat and firewall

2008-09-24 Thread fire jotawski
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:52 PM, FBSD1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of fire jotawski > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 12:13 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Su

RE: nat and firewall

2008-09-24 Thread FBSD1
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of fire jotawski Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 12:13 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: nat and firewall hi sirs, i am confused now that what is the difference between nat and firewall_nat in

nat and firewall

2008-09-23 Thread fire jotawski
hi sirs, i am confused now that what is the difference between nat and firewall_nat in /etc/rc file natd_enable="YES" firewall_nat_enable="YES" just one question per asking. there will be another more questions about this but for this moment only this one first. thanks in advance for any helps

Re: NAT and Firewall Configuration ?

2002-11-30 Thread Jonathan Clarke
> I am in the process of configuring NAT and a firewall on FreeBSD 4.7 > Stable. I have configured the external interface with 2 class C addresses > 192.x.x.1 and 192.x.x.2. and the internal interface with 192.168.x.1 ( > gateway ) > I have also configured natd_flags="-redirect_address 192.168.x.3

NAT and Firewall Configuration ?

2002-11-30 Thread Nelis Lamprecht
Hi List I am in the process of configuring NAT and a firewall on FreeBSD 4.7 Stable. I have configured the external interface with 2 class C addresses 192.x.x.1 and 192.x.x.2. and the internal interface with 192.168.x.1 ( gateway ) I have also configured natd_flags="-redirect_address 192.168.x