On 22 July 2010 02:16, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Aiza wrote:
>
> >
> > Not yet, when I have a spare box I might, although I quite like using
> >> zfs for jails as you can limit the disk usage dynamically per zfs
> >> filesystem and I didnt see any support there y
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Aiza wrote:
>
> Not yet, when I have a spare box I might, although I quite like using
>> zfs for jails as you can limit the disk usage dynamically per zfs
>> filesystem and I didnt see any support there yet, even basic support
>> like there is with ezjail would b
On 21 July 2010 12:37, Aiza wrote:
> Valentin Bud wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Aiza wrote:
>>
>> Not yet, when I have a spare box I might, although I quite like using
>>>
zfs for jails as you can limit the disk usage dynamically per zfs
filesystem and I didnt see any
Valentin Bud wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Aiza wrote:
Not yet, when I have a spare box I might, although I quite like using
zfs for jails as you can limit the disk usage dynamically per zfs
filesystem and I didnt see any support there yet, even basic support
like there is with ez
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Aiza wrote:
>
> Not yet, when I have a spare box I might, although I quite like using
>> zfs for jails as you can limit the disk usage dynamically per zfs
>> filesystem and I didnt see any support there yet, even basic support
>> like there is with ezjail would
On 21 July 2010 10:46, Aiza wrote:
>
>> i have only done preliminary tinkering and it looks ok so far (i did have
>> to
>> pre bind the jail ip). Might have to find a box to put freebsd 9 on and
>> see
>> how it works with the network stack virtualization.
>>
>
> Please explain what you mean by p
Not yet, when I have a spare box I might, although I quite like using
zfs for jails as you can limit the disk usage dynamically per zfs
filesystem and I didnt see any support there yet, even basic support
like there is with ezjail would be nice.
Zfs was left out because its over kill. Sparse
i have only done preliminary tinkering and it looks ok so far (i did have to
pre bind the jail ip). Might have to find a box to put freebsd 9 on and see
how it works with the network stack virtualization.
Please explain what you mean by pre-bind the jail ip address. I think
you skipped over th
krad wrote:
Anyone tried using it yet? Not much info out there apart from the
announcments it seems. In my quick play with it this morning, it didnt seem
to be binding the ips to the jails. Not sure if you are supposed to have the
ip bound to the box before you use the jail. Would make sense if
On 21 July 2010 10:15, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> On 21/07/2010 10:08, krad wrote:
> >
> > Anyone tried using it yet? Not much info out there apart from the
> > announcments it seems. In my quick play with it this morning, it didnt
> seem
> > to be binding the ips to the jails. Not sure if you are
On 21/07/2010 10:08, krad wrote:
>
> Anyone tried using it yet? Not much info out there apart from the
> announcments it seems. In my quick play with it this morning, it didnt seem
> to be binding the ips to the jails. Not sure if you are supposed to have the
> ip bound to the box before you use th
On 20 July 2010 21:36, Jerry wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:45:37 +0800
> Aiza articulated:
>
>
> > There has been the normal pre RELEASE freeze on since xmas, that is why
> > no port activity is occurring right now.
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=148777
>
> Date: Tue, 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aiza wrote:
> Jerry wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:25:32 +0800
>> Aiza articulated:
>>
>>
>>> Like the announcement said the port is available at
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/qjail/
>>>
>>> And if you have ever submitted a new port for inclus
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:45:37 +0800
Aiza articulated:
> There has been the normal pre RELEASE freeze on since xmas, that is why
> no port activity is occurring right now.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=148777
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:47:18 GMT
It was only just submitted.
Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:25:32 +0800
Aiza articulated:
Like the announcement said the port is available at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/qjail/
And if you have ever submitted a new port for inclusion into the freebsd
ports system you would know that it takes months for it to s
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:25:32 +0800
Aiza articulated:
> Like the announcement said the port is available at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/qjail/
>
> And if you have ever submitted a new port for inclusion into the freebsd
> ports system you would know that it takes months for it to show up
Jerry wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:29:56 +0800
Aiza articulated:
This is a news announcement to inform people who have interest in jails,
that a new jail utility is available.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/qjail/
Has a file suitable for the pkg_add command or the port make files can
be
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:29:56 +0800
Aiza articulated:
> This is a news announcement to inform people who have interest in jails,
> that a new jail utility is available.
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/qjail/
>
> Has a file suitable for the pkg_add command or the port make files can
> be do
This is a news announcement to inform people who have interest in jails,
that a new jail utility is available.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/qjail/
Has a file suitable for the pkg_add command or the port make files can
be downloaded and a "make install" run.
Qjail [ q = quick ] is a 4th ge
19 matches
Mail list logo
