Re: openoffice too large

2003-02-19 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:19:23PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I, too, had the same problem with the amount of > space needed to "install" openoffice. The partition holding > /usr/ports was way too small on my machine. I finally cheated > and copied the ports directory to a different (and la

Re: openoffice too large

2003-02-18 Thread paleph
>From: "Brian Henning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "freebsd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: openoffice too large >Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:30:02 -0600 >Hello- >I am trying to install openoffice from the ports on to a machine that only >has a

Re: openoffice too large

2003-02-18 Thread Jan Grant
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Brian Henning wrote: > Hello- > I am trying to install openoffice from the ports on to a machine that only has a > 4 gig hard drive. During the installation it say it requires at least 4 gigs of > free space to install. Obviously i cannot have that much free space, is there a

Re: openoffice too large

2003-02-18 Thread Lord Sith
From: "Brian Henning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "freebsd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: openoffice too large Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:30:02 -0600 Hello- I am trying to install openoffice from the ports on to a machine that only has a 4 gig hard drive. During the in

Re: openoffice too large

2003-02-18 Thread Brian T. Schellenberger
I would suggest installing staroffice instead. You can install it from binaries so you don't have to compile it. In my experience it runs a lot faster & better than openoffice as well. I had installed openoffice but wound up dumping it in favor of staroffice myself. On Tuesday 18 February

openoffice too large

2003-02-18 Thread Brian Henning
Hello- I am trying to install openoffice from the ports on to a machine that only has a 4 gig hard drive. During the installation it say it requires at least 4 gigs of free space to install. Obviously i cannot have that much free space, is there a way to get it installed on this computer with my si