Re: options used to compile packages

2011-07-18 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com writes: David Arendt wrote: Hi, well I don't actually now which package it was, but I compiled gdm (so it should be one of it's dependencies). A compilation resulted in a non working gdm (something with pam support not found on execution). Upon

Re: options used to compile packages

2011-07-17 Thread David Arendt
Hi, When I did the test, I used FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 using the ports collection delivered with this distribution. Yesterday I did a checkout of the latest ports tree. I compiled bash, xorg, xfce and gdm using the default options. When trying to login using gdm, it still complains about a missing

Re: options used to compile packages

2011-07-17 Thread Michael Powell
David Arendt wrote: Hi, well I don't actually now which package it was, but I compiled gdm (so it should be one of it's dependencies). A compilation resulted in a non working gdm (something with pam support not found on execution). Upon installing gdm and is dependencies from packages,

Re: options used to compile packages

2011-07-17 Thread b. f.
On 7/17/11, David Arendt ad...@prnet.org wrote: When I did the test, I used FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 using the ports collection delivered with this distribution. I see. Since that time, there have been very few changes to the version of the base system used to build the packages for 8, but more to

options used to compile packages

2011-07-16 Thread David Arendt
? If not, it would be very good to make it available as ports default options seem to be different from options used to compile official packages. Thanks in advance Bye, David Arendt ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: options used to compile packages

2011-07-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
package collection available somewhere ? If not, it would be very good to make it available as ports default options seem to be different from options used to compile official packages. Official packages are compiled using the default options in each port. What have you found where

Re: options used to compile packages

2011-07-16 Thread David Arendt
used to compile the official freebsd package collection available somewhere ? If not, it would be very good to make it available as ports default options seem to be different from options used to compile official packages. Official packages are compiled using the default options in each

Re: options used to compile packages

2011-07-16 Thread b. f.
? If not, it would be very good to make it available as ports default options seem to be different from options used to compile official packages. As far as I know, the default options are used to compile the standard packages. Where did you think that there were differences? The official builds

Re: options used to compile packages

2011-07-16 Thread b. f.
well I don't actually now which package it was, but I compiled gdm (so it should be one of it's dependencies). A compilation resulted in a non working gdm (something with pam support not found on execution). Upon installing gdm and is dependencies from packages, everything worked correctly.