you may want to look up this section of the handbook:
Chapter 5 Installing Applications: Packages and Ports
How to upgrade your applications is explained there;
long story short, there are three utilities i know of that may be used to
keep your applications up-to-date irrespective of the
On 12/20/2011 4:19 AM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
you may want to look up this section of the handbook:
Chapter 5 Installing Applications: Packages and Ports
How to upgrade your applications is explained there;
I actually am doing so right now. I started cleaning out the CPU cooling
system on
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Allen unix.hac...@comcast.net wrote:
On 12/20/2011 4:19 AM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
you may want to look up this section of the handbook:
Chapter 5 Installing Applications: Packages and Ports
How to upgrade your applications is explained there;
I
On 12/20/2011 6:16 AM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
*SNIP*
about FVWM2 not working on your other FreeBSD install...
i'm not sure how you set up your X11 system and your window manager, but
this section of the handbook, Chapter 6 The X Window System, has
instructions for setting up a desktop
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 01:19:04 -0500, Allen wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to find info about this, so I'm Hoping someone here
will know about this; I use FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE, and basically, the
normal way I do things, is like this:
I grab the CD, boot, and install the Base System. Once I've
On 12/20/2011 12:20 PM, Polytropon wrote:
*SNIP* I snipped out a bunch of this so that whoever reads this next
doesn't have to go through all of that text all at once, but I REALLY
wanted to get a chance to say this:
THANK YOU! Danke schoen sehr sehr sehr!!!
In all my years, I've only heard a
At 07:19 20/12/2011, you wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to find info about this, so I'm Hoping someone here
will know about this; I use FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE, and basically, the
normal way I do things, is like this:
I grab the CD, boot, and install the Base System. Once I've booted, I'll
then use
Hi,
I've been trying to find info about this, so I'm Hoping someone here
will know about this; I use FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE, and basically, the
normal way I do things, is like this:
I grab the CD, boot, and install the Base System. Once I've booted, I'll
then use one of the two:
pkg_add -r bunch
Nerius Landys writes:
By bringing the patch level up to date I assume you mean a tag such
as this one:
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8_0
That is what I meant.
in your standard-supfile file, and then doing the make buildworld
etc. prodedure outlined in the Handbook.
The release
Does it make any difference if one adds packages to a new system
before or after using cvsup to bring the patch level up to date?
I ask this because it takes about half an hour to go
from nothing to a bootable system via a script but it can take
several hours for cvsub to update the
Does it make any difference if one adds packages to a new system
before or after using cvsup to bring the patch level up to date?
By bringing the patch level up to date I assume you mean a tag such
as this one:
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8_0
in your standard-supfile file, and then
Does it make any difference if one adds packages to a new system
before or after using cvsup to bring the patch level up to date?
By bringing the patch level up to date I assume you mean a tag such
as this one:
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8_0
in your standard-supfile file, and then
Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:36, Mel Flynn
mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote:
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 17:21:42 Kurt Buff wrote:
All,
I've gotten a patch for a program in the ports tree from one of the
authors of the program - not the port maintainer - to
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 07:06, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote:
Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:36, Mel Flynn
mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote:
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 17:21:42 Kurt Buff wrote:
All,
I've gotten a patch for a program in the ports tree
All,
I've gotten a patch for a program in the ports tree from one of the
authors of the program - not the port maintainer - to fix a small
problem, but don't know how to install the updated port.
I cd'ed into the
/usr/ports/%CATEGORY%/%PROGRAM%/work/%PROGRAM-VERSION% directory, then
performed
2009/5/27 Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com:
All,
I've gotten a patch for a program in the ports tree from one of the
authors of the program - not the port maintainer - to fix a small
problem, but don't know how to install the updated port.
I cd'ed into the
I've gotten a patch for a program in the ports tree from one of the
authors of the program - not the port maintainer - to fix a small
problem, but don't know how to install the updated port.
i think it's best to add your patch to /usr/ports/blah/blah/files
with name patch-something
look at
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 08:48, Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/5/27 Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com:
All,
I've gotten a patch for a program in the ports tree from one of the
authors of the program - not the port maintainer - to fix a small
problem, but don't know how to install
I really should learn to hit reply-all on these lists...
Kurt
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 08:54, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
I've gotten a patch for a program in the ports tree from one of the
authors of the program - not the port maintainer - to fix a small
problem,
with name patch-something
look at existing as an example
That didn't seem to work.
what exactly doesn't? could you please post error messages?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Er, I also need to learn that reply-all skill! This'll make for easy
understanding in the Archives
2009/5/27 Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 08:48, Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/5/27 Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com:
All,
I've gotten a patch for a
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:23, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
with name patch-something
look at existing as an example
That didn't seem to work.
what exactly doesn't? could you please post error messages?
There were no error messages.
Then, being the incredibly
time after taking the blindingly obvious step of deleting the 'work'
directory.
This seems to be a key part of the process.
The patch doesn't install correctly, as the make process generates the
it installs correctly for sure :) as you don't see errors
following:
HttpHeader.cc:127:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:41, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
time after taking the blindingly obvious step of deleting the 'work'
directory.
This seems to be a key part of the process.
The patch doesn't install correctly, as the make process generates the
it
Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:23, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
with name patch-something
look at existing as an example
That didn't seem to work.
what exactly doesn't? could you please post error messages?
There were no error messages.
Then,
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:51, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote:
Can you post the patch, and I'll test it out here? (Forgive me if you've
done this and I missed it).
Steve
Sent off-list.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:51, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote:
Can you post the patch, and I'll test it out here? (Forgive me if you've
done this and I missed it).
Steve
Sent off-list.
Ok, got it.
I'm pretty much taking an easy day today to recover my broken
Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:51, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote:
Can you post the patch, and I'll test it out here? (Forgive me if you've
done this and I missed it).
Steve
Sent off-list.
Kurt, can you please provide:
# uname -a
- the default tag you use in your
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:02, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote:
Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:51, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote:
Can you post the patch, and I'll test it out here? (Forgive me if you've
done this and I missed it).
Steve
Sent off-list.
Kurt,
Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:02, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote:
Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:51, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote:
Can you post the patch, and I'll test it out here? (Forgive me if you've
done this and I missed it).
Steve
Sent
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 17:21:42 Kurt Buff wrote:
All,
I've gotten a patch for a program in the ports tree from one of the
authors of the program - not the port maintainer - to fix a small
problem, but don't know how to install the updated port.
I cd'ed into the
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:36, Mel Flynn
mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote:
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 17:21:42 Kurt Buff wrote:
All,
I've gotten a patch for a program in the ports tree from one of the
authors of the program - not the port maintainer - to fix a small
problem,
*Snipping for those who don't want to have an inbox full of my text, and
out of being polite*
Thanks very much! I've been thinking about setting up another FreeBSD
machine so I can test both CVS and FreeBSD-update without mixing the two
together which from what I hear is a bad idea, and I
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:30:14 +0200
DA Forsyth d.fors...@ru.ac.za wrote:
use RELEASE for a production server, STABLE on a desktop or test
machine. IMHO
I'd say follow what it says in the handbook and use a release unless you
have a good reason to use stable, such as support for a particular
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:37:14 -0500
From: Akenner slackwarew...@comcast.net
Subject: Patching / Updating / Upgrading
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Hello all,
So if anyone could lend a little but in typing out what they use for
updates and how they go about it, I'd appreciate
Hello all,
I've been using this list to my advantage for a while to learn things I
can't seem to grasp, and I've gotten great amounts of help.
I have a question in regards to the process of patching / Updating /
Upgrading I'd like a hand with. I have two machines running FreeBSD
7.1-RELEASE
Akenner wrote:
Hello all,
I've been using this list to my advantage for a while to learn things
I can't seem to grasp, and I've gotten great amounts of help.
I have a question in regards to the process of patching / Updating /
Upgrading I'd like a hand with. I have two machines running
Hello all
I am trying to install the php 5.2.6 port with thttpd. I have a patch file
to make it compile with version 2.25b, because the standard version only
works with 2.21. The patch works but the files always get overwritten when I
run the build again. How do I do this?
These are the commands
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 11:37:29AM +0100, Tamar Lea wrote:
Hello all
I am trying to install the php 5.2.6 port with thttpd. I have a patch file
to make it compile with version 2.25b, because the standard version only
works with 2.21. The patch works but the files always get overwritten when
Thanks for your reply, Jeremy. I now understand why it didn't work, but I
have absolutely no idea how to edit configure.in. I have only just figured
out what my patch is doing today. I think it would be easier to tell the
makefile to modify configure after the autoconf, but I don't know how to do
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 01:14:03PM +0100, Tamar Lea wrote:
Thanks for your reply, Jeremy. I now understand why it didn't work, but I
have absolutely no idea how to edit configure.in. I have only just figured
out what my patch is doing today. I think it would be easier to tell the
makefile to
Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks to Lars I have come up with the following (to upgrade BIND for
the DNS caching issue)...(short of updateing all source).
Download the latest port BIND95.9.5.x (p2 I think),
9.5.0.2 -- correct.
Extract it to the ports directory,
make -DWITH_REPLACE_BASE
correct?
Also,
Will the installation leave all my current (BIND) configs alone?
-Grant
- Original Message -
From: Lars Kristiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gpeel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: BIND DNS Patching on 6.1, 6.2
gpeel
-
From: Lars Kristiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gpeel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: BIND DNS Patching on 6.1, 6.2
gpeel skrev:
I was thinking I would try the BIND959.5.0 port, but it apprears that
this version is still vulneralbe
-oarc.net TXT
will hopefully now give a result that includes the word GREAT.
Lars
- Original Message - From: Lars Kristiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gpeel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: BIND DNS Patching on 6.1, 6.2
gpeel skrev:
I
Hi all,
I have ten webservers that I would like nothing more than to update to 6.3 or
7.x
But right now I just dont have time.
I was wondering if anyone has tried the patches BIND DNS Poioning listed on
the freebsd homepage (security advisories) on 6.1 and/or 6.2 and if they
worked OK.
Hi Again,
When I posted this question originally, I had forgotten that I had a devel
server running FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. I tried the 6.3 patch, and it would not
make properly.
I was thinking I would try the BIND959.5.0 port, but it apprears that this
version is still vulneralbe.
So I suppose
gpeel skrev:
I was thinking I would try the BIND959.5.0 port, but it apprears that this
version is still vulneralbe.
The port dns/bind95 is patched:
$ named -version
BIND 9.5.0-P2
Easily installed with the option WITH_REPLACE_BASE.
Regards,
Lars
Greetings. I'm building a cyrus-imapd 2.3.11 server from ports on
FreeBSD 7.0/i386. I'm also using these two University of Athens patches:
http://email.uoa.gr/download/cyrus/cyrus-imapd-2.3.11/cyrus-imapd-2.3.11-autocreate-0.10-0.diff
Nomad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I installed FreeBSD 6.2 on my computer but the network card (bge) wasn't
detected properly. On troubleshooting the problem I found the driver for
this family of NICs isn't appropriate to my particular release. I would
prefer to stay with the RELEASE branch
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Nomad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I installed FreeBSD 6.2 on my computer but the network card (bge) wasn't
detected properly. On troubleshooting the problem I found the driver for
this family of NICs isn't appropriate to my particular release. I would
prefer to stay
I installed FreeBSD 6.2 on my computer but the network card (bge) wasn't
detected properly. On troubleshooting the problem I found the driver for
this family of NICs isn't appropriate to my particular release. I would
prefer to stay with the RELEASE branch but found an updated
driver. In
Am Montag, den 09.07.2007, 19:16 -0400 schrieb Gerard:
On July 09, 2007 at 04:59PM Stevan Tiefert wrote:
What is going wrong? Why he is not updating?
You should check out these two URL's to get a better idea of what you
are attempting to do as well as how to accomplish it.
Am Montag, den 09.07.2007, 17:11 -0700 schrieb Jay Chandler:
Stevan Tiefert wrote:
What is going wrong? Why he is not updating?
Really dumb question-- have you tried rebooting to commit the uname -a
display change?
Really dumb answer. Yes I did!
Am Montag, den 09.07.2007, 17:37 -0500 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 09/07/07, Stevan Tiefert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
I wanted to update via freebsd-update from 6.2-RELEASE-p4 to
6.2-RELEASE-p5. But like you can see my system is after the update still
p4!
I have saved a
Stevan Tiefert wrote:
The problem is that in these two chapters of the handbook is not
handling freebsd-update... And if you use freebsd-update you need not
necessarily to do a buildkernel or buildworld.
I've been meaning to write a handbook chapter about FreeBSD Update for
many months, but
Hello list,
I wanted to update via freebsd-update from 6.2-RELEASE-p4 to
6.2-RELEASE-p5. But like you can see my system is after the update still
p4!
I have saved a script of my doing:
Script started on Mon Jul 9 22:55:13 2007
vagabund# freebsd-update fetch
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org
Stevan Tiefert wrote:
Hello list,
I wanted to update via freebsd-update from 6.2-RELEASE-p4 to
6.2-RELEASE-p5. But like you can see my system is after the update still
p4!
I have saved a script of my doing:
Script started on Mon Jul 9 22:55:13 2007
vagabund# freebsd-update fetch
On 09/07/07, Stevan Tiefert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
I wanted to update via freebsd-update from 6.2-RELEASE-p4 to
6.2-RELEASE-p5. But like you can see my system is after the update still
p4!
I have saved a script of my doing:
Script started on Mon Jul 9 22:55:13 2007
vagabund#
On July 09, 2007 at 04:59PM Stevan Tiefert wrote:
What is going wrong? Why he is not updating?
You should check out these two URL's to get a better idea of what you
are attempting to do as well as how to accomplish it.
Stevan Tiefert wrote:
What is going wrong? Why he is not updating?
Really dumb question-- have you tried rebooting to commit the uname -a
display change?
--
Jay Chandler
Systems Exorcist
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello,
I am patching for the recent sendmail advisory:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-06:13.sendmail.asc
I have followed the patching instructions:
b) Execute the following commands as root
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 16:35, Ensel Sharon wrote:
Hello,
I am patching for the recent sendmail advisory:
snip
and now all I need to do is restart sendmail so that the new binaries are
loaded and running.
I _think_ the correct method is:
cd /etc/mail
make restart
You are correct
On Friday 16 December 2005 18:18, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2005-12-16, Ian Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having some trouble with the www/sarg port. The writer has sent me
a=20 couple of .patch files to apply and I'm wondering if there's some
way to=20 apply those patches and
Hi,
I'm having some trouble with the www/sarg port. The writer has sent me a
couple of .patch files to apply and I'm wondering if there's some way to
apply those patches and still use the ports system to build install the
port.
I know the source code installs stuff in places that aren't the
On 2005-12-16, Ian Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having some trouble with the www/sarg port. The writer has sent me a=20
couple of .patch files to apply and I'm wondering if there's some way to=20
apply those patches and still use the ports system to build install the=20
port.
I know
Guillaume R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to install the last version of emacs (to test Gnus!) on my
box. I've got a compil error, I made a search and found that thread:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-September/025703.html
By reading the thread I could deduce
Hello
I'm trying to install the last version of emacs (to test Gnus!) on my
box. I've got a compil error, I made a search and found that thread:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-September/025703.html
By reading the thread I could deduce that this patch seems to work
fine. I
G'day. I am quite new with supporting FreeBSD, although well
experienced with Unix and Linux in general, so I hope these questions
are not too silly.
My first question is about firewalls: I have read the FreeBSD handbook
and browsed the ports database, etc, to find out about firewalling.
It
think patching should be done
for smaller updates and security patches. You might try that next
time.
So: how can I bring this up to the latest stable release in the 5.4
series?
Check the handbook Chp 20. For production servers, in particular
if they are critical like firewalls, you want to go
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Foo Ji-Haw wrote:
Thanks for the brief breakdown on ipf and ipfilter. But what about ipfw? I
like the 'auto-swap ruleset' feature, as well as account. Does ipfw do them
as well? Thanks.
No idea, never used it and I don´t plan to. I'm using pf now, it
does what I need
Daniel Pittman wrote:
It looks to me like either ipf or ipfilter are equally good, and have
about the same capabilities,
While you are getting started and to test rules you could use
/etc/hosts.allow also.
You may already be familiar with it from other OSs.. We use to keep a
list of what
Hi,
I want to know ow to upgarde or patch my FreeBSD 5.4 version to FreeBSD
5.4-p7
Cheers,
Deepak Naidu.
-
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with
Yahoo! Photos. Get Yahoo! Photos
On 10/9/05, Deepak Naidu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to know ow to upgarde or patch my FreeBSD 5.4 version to FreeBSD
5.4-p7
Cheers,
Deepak Naidu.
The common response to this is that it's in the handbook. I'm trying
to find it there, though, and am having a lot of trouble.
David Kirchner wrote:
On 10/9/05, Deepak Naidu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to know ow to upgarde or patch my FreeBSD 5.4 version to FreeBSD
5.4-p7
Cheers,
Deepak Naidu.
The common response to this is that it's in the handbook. I'm trying
to find it there, though, and am having
How does one make a patch for a while, that has blanks in the path:
--- foo bar/meow~ Fri Mar 11 09:00:49 2005
+++ foo bar/meowFri Jun 10 12:17:22 2005
- a = 0;
+ a = 1;
With the above example, patch searches only for `foo', then gives up and asks
for help. I tried
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
How does one make a patch for a while, that has blanks in the path:
--- foo bar/meow~ Fri Mar 11 09:00:49 2005
+++ foo bar/meowFri Jun 10 12:17:22 2005
- a = 0;
+ a = 1;
With the above example, patch searches only for `foo', then gives up and
--- foo bar/meow~ Fri Mar 11 09:00:49 2005
+++ foo bar/meowFri Jun 10 12:17:22 2005
- a = 0;
+ a = 1;
With the above example patch searches only for `foo', then gives up and
asks for help. I tried quoting the entire file name and escaping the
blanks with backslashes --
If one patches the system per the SA's (Security Advisories) is it
possible to reproduce the the RELEASE-p(x) output you get when you cvsup
the src etc.?
--
Best regards,
Chris
When putting it into memory, remember where you put it.
___
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 01:43:00AM -0500, RL wrote:
Hi, if you update your source tree through cvsup now and them, is it
still necessary to follow the FreeBSD security advisories and patch
your system? In others words, when you cvsup the source through
RELENG_5_3 and make the world, does it
Hi, if you update your source tree through cvsup now and them, is it
still necessary to follow the FreeBSD security advisories and patch
your system? In others words, when you cvsup the source through
RELENG_5_3 and make the world, does it include all the security
patches you see at FreeBSD.org?
Hi
How do I add a patch to a certain port?
Usually I would use the patch program to add the patch to the source code.
But when using ports the system begins compiling right after rewtrieving the source.
Thus not giving me a change to apply the patch.
I've seen a folder named files in which
Mikkel Christensen wrote:
Hi
How do I add a patch to a certain port?
Usually I would use the patch program to add the patch to the source code.
But when using ports the system begins compiling right after rewtrieving the source.
Thus
not giving me a change to apply the patch.
I've seen a folder
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:11:22PM +, Mikkel Christensen wrote:
How do I add a patch to a certain port?
Usually I would use the patch program to add the patch to the source code.
But when using ports the system begins compiling right after rewtrieving the source.
Thus not giving me a
On Wednesday 05 May 2004 12:29, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:11:22PM +, Mikkel Christensen wrote:
How do I add a patch to a certain port?
Usually I would use the patch program to add the patch to the source code.
But when using ports the system begins compiling
Hi,
How do I add a patch to a certain port? Usually I would use the patch
program to add the patch to the source code. But when using ports the
system begins compiling right after rewtrieving the source. Thus not
giving me a change to apply the patch. I've seen a folder named files
in which
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2004-03-29 15:07, Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 29, 2004, at 2:28 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
[ ... ]
If a tag just the 4_9 Release in the CVSupfile can i just ignore the
mergemaster? also can I just CVSup the sources and build the ones I
want? (see above)
* Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-30 11:14]:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2004-03-29 15:07, Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 29, 2004, at 2:28 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
[ ... ]
If a tag just the 4_9 Release in the CVSupfile can i just ignore the
mergemaster? also can I just
I would like to stay patched with the latest security advisories.
However usually I wait until the next release iso becomes available and
do a fresh install that includes all the known exploites. My reason
behind this is the makeworld, CVSup, and mergemaster is very time
On Monday 29 March 2004 01:28 pm, Sean Murphy wrote:
I would like to stay patched with the latest security advisories.
However usually I wait until the next release iso becomes available and
do a fresh install that includes all the known exploites. My reason
behind this is the makeworld,
On Mar 29, 2004, at 2:28 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
I don't want to build all sources when I just need these on my
system (bin, man, and crypto). The same selection I use from a new
install from /stand/sysinstall. Is that possible?
If you look at /etc/default/make.conf for a bunch of components
On 2004-03-29 15:07, Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 29, 2004, at 2:28 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
I don't want to build all sources when I just need these on my
system (bin, man, and crypto). The same selection I use from a new
install from /stand/sysinstall. Is that possible?
If
I've got my first jail up and working, installed Apache and just
generally poking around. There is one area of jail management that
I've not found any documentation for. How does one keep it up to date?
Keeping things from ports updated is straight forward, the same as
any real host. I'm
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 10:22:54AM -0500, Chad M Stewart wrote:
I've got my first jail up and working, installed Apache and just
generally poking around. There is one area of jail management that
I've not found any documentation for. How does one keep it up to date?
Keeping things
Hi all (and excuse my English, please)
I need to patch script (/usr/src/usr.bin/script - /usr/bin/script),
but I don't know how to do it correctly.
Here is the patch and the bug report:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=56166
I think script is the problem, I have some errors with
,^.*$,#!/usr/local/bin/python2.3,'
/usr/ports/lang/python/work/Python-2.3/Tools/scripts/idle
/usr/ports/lang/python/work/idle2.3
=== Patching for python-2.3.2
=== python-2.3.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/sed_inplace - found
=== Applying FreeBSD patches for python-2.3.2
1 out of 2 hunks failed
Hi,
I have found some instructions on how to patch a device driver [so as to get
an onboard network card to get picked up]. I was wondering if anyone had any
instructions on how to go about adding the patch, i have never done it
before...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Have a look at file:/usr/share/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/index.html
for all the details.
- Original Message -
From: Jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Patching source in a port
Is it possible to patch the source code in a port, and then make,
make
install again to get it to install
Is it possible to patch the source code in a port, and then make, make
install again to get it to install the patched code? I tried applying the
sendmail patch. I had previously installed 8.12.9 from ports.
This is basically what I did:
cd
patching before, I could use
some help.
I can't see why the patch would fail, but it looks like you should be
able to easily make the change by hand (putting the later-dated string
in the file). Or you could ignore it -- it doesn't really affect
anything
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
