Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Aug 02), DAve said:
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Aug 01), DAve said:
We are in the process of getting a good hammering of spam. I've
been watching my mail gateways and they are keeping up well enough.
But looking
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Aug 02), DAve said:
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Aug 01), DAve said:
We are in the process of getting a good hammering of spam. I've
been watching my mail gateways and they are keeping up well enough.
But looking at top I am seei
In the last episode (Aug 02), DAve said:
> Dan Nelson wrote:
> >In the last episode (Aug 01), DAve said:
> >>We are in the process of getting a good hammering of spam. I've
> >>been watching my mail gateways and they are keeping up well enough.
> >>But looking at top I am seeing a lot of processes
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Aug 01), DAve said:
We are in the process of getting a good hammering of spam. I've been
watching my mail gateways and they are keeping up well enough. But
looking at top I am seeing a lot of processes with state of piperd.
Piperd means the process is wai
In the last episode (Aug 01), DAve said:
> We are in the process of getting a good hammering of spam. I've been
> watching my mail gateways and they are keeping up well enough. But
> looking at top I am seeing a lot of processes with state of piperd.
Piperd means the process is waiting on a read f
Good morning,
We are in the process of getting a good hammering of spam. I've been
watching my mail gateways and they are keeping up well enough. But
looking at top I am seeing a lot of processes with state of piperd.
Possibly I misunderstand it's meaning. I thought that was a lack of file
d
