pls help network thoughput

2006-01-09 Thread ann kok
Hi Andrew and all

I installed freebsd 6.0, complied the kernal and  put
the polling setting to sysctl.conf

after rebooting, it shows kern.polling.enable is
deprecated use ifconfig (8)

Do you have any ideas?

2/ how can I page up the see previous boot message in
the console?

Thank you for your help



--- Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 1/7/06, ann kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Dear Andrew
 
  Thank you for your help in advance
 
  I keep checking the loading. it is running fine.
 the
  load averages is not over to 1.0
 
 
  System info:
  Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
  2G memory
 
  for the sysctl var:
 
  kern.polling.enable=1
  kern.polling.user_frac=10
  kern.ipc.somaxconn=2048
  kern.polling.poll_in_trap=1
 
  I don't run   iperf and my switch is not
 managable.
 
  could you provide any hints to check it?
 
  and tune the system also.
 
  Thank you again
 
 
 
  last pid: 47008;  load averages:  0.00,  0.02, 
 0.02
   up
  80+11:09:17  22:42:18
  31 processes:  1 running, 30 sleeping
  CPU states: % user, % nice, % system,
  % interrupt, % idle
  Mem: 100M Active, 1639M Inact, 201M Wired, 60M
 Cache,
  199M Buf, 11M Free
 
 With such a high-spec box, you should probably be
 running
 FreeBSD 6. It has much more polling related sysctl
 tunable.
 We've got too FreeBSD 5 firewalls at our site (which
 are doing
 just fine), and I'm gonna upgrade them to 6.0 one of
 these
 days.
 
 Look at netstat -s to see how many packets are
 broken.
 Maybe your switch/cabling can't cope with the load.
 
 Where are the figures from the top output. I only
 see percent
 signs.
 
 Try running iperf. It's really easy. Just install
 the port on two
 boxes, run iperf -s on one and iperf -c other IP
 on the
 other.
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: pls help network thoughput

2006-01-07 Thread Andrew P.
On 1/7/06, ann kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear Andrew

 Thank you for your help in advance

 I keep checking the loading. it is running fine. the
 load averages is not over to 1.0


 System info:
 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
 2G memory

 for the sysctl var:

 kern.polling.enable=1
 kern.polling.user_frac=10
 kern.ipc.somaxconn=2048
 kern.polling.poll_in_trap=1

 I don't run   iperf and my switch is not managable.

 could you provide any hints to check it?

 and tune the system also.

 Thank you again



 last pid: 47008;  load averages:  0.00,  0.02,  0.02
  up
 80+11:09:17  22:42:18
 31 processes:  1 running, 30 sleeping
 CPU states: % user, % nice, % system,
 % interrupt, % idle
 Mem: 100M Active, 1639M Inact, 201M Wired, 60M Cache,
 199M Buf, 11M Free

With such a high-spec box, you should probably be running
FreeBSD 6. It has much more polling related sysctl tunable.
We've got too FreeBSD 5 firewalls at our site (which are doing
just fine), and I'm gonna upgrade them to 6.0 one of these
days.

Look at netstat -s to see how many packets are broken.
Maybe your switch/cabling can't cope with the load.

Where are the figures from the top output. I only see percent
signs.

Try running iperf. It's really easy. Just install the port on two
boxes, run iperf -s on one and iperf -c other IP on the
other.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


pls help network thoughput

2006-01-06 Thread ann kok
Hi all

I use feebsd 4.11 as router with intel Giga card about
1 year

Recently, the bandwidth couldn't grow and stop to
about 383M. ls it the maximum thoughtput of the
freebsd?

have you had any experience on it?

The router is running POLLING instead of interrupt

and I had experience in freebsd 5.3. the max was about
below 200M
in the mrtg graph

Thank you for your help










__ 
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. 
Just $16.99/mo. or less. 
dsl.yahoo.com 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: pls help network thoughput

2006-01-06 Thread Andrew P.
On 1/7/06, ann kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi all

 I use feebsd 4.11 as router with intel Giga card about
 1 year

 Recently, the bandwidth couldn't grow and stop to
 about 383M. ls it the maximum thoughtput of the
 freebsd?

Yes, FreeBSD has quite a few limits hardcoded which
gives other OSes a chance to look decent in various
tests and benchmarks.

Anyway, please provide additional details. CPU
load one of the most important factors here. According
to some people, polling makes it show incorrect (lower)
values. Can you run iperf with different switches? Can
you try and tweak polling-related sysctl variables?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: pls help network thoughput

2006-01-06 Thread ann kok
Dear Andrew

Thank you for your help in advance

I keep checking the loading. it is running fine. the
load averages is not over to 1.0


System info:
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
2G memory

for the sysctl var:

kern.polling.enable=1
kern.polling.user_frac=10
kern.ipc.somaxconn=2048
kern.polling.poll_in_trap=1

I don't run   iperf and my switch is not managable.

could you provide any hints to check it?

and tune the system also.

Thank you again 



last pid: 47008;  load averages:  0.00,  0.02,  0.02  
 up
80+11:09:17  22:42:18
31 processes:  1 running, 30 sleeping
CPU states: % user, % nice, % system,
% interrupt, % idle
Mem: 100M Active, 1639M Inact, 201M Wired, 60M Cache,
199M Buf, 11M Free


--- Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 1/7/06, ann kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi all
 
  I use feebsd 4.11 as router with intel Giga card
 about
  1 year
 
  Recently, the bandwidth couldn't grow and stop to
  about 383M. ls it the maximum thoughtput of the
  freebsd?
 
 Yes, FreeBSD has quite a few limits hardcoded which
 gives other OSes a chance to look decent in various
 tests and benchmarks.
 
 Anyway, please provide additional details. CPU
 load one of the most important factors here.
 According
 to some people, polling makes it show incorrect
 (lower)
 values. Can you run iperf with different switches?
 Can
 you try and tweak polling-related sysctl variables?
 




__ 
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. 
Just $16.99/mo. or less. 
dsl.yahoo.com 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]