portmanager question

2006-11-05 Thread Tsu-Fan Cheng
Hi people, as recently i have problem with firefox, i thought i will try to upgrade my port by my way... as i first run portmanager -s log to see what ports are outdated, and if that port seem critical, I will do portupgrade -R/-r to fix it. it's probably not the best, but I decided to

Re: portmanager question

2006-11-05 Thread Gerard Seibert
On Sunday November 05, 2006 at 12:16:52 (PM) Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: Hi people, as recently i have problem with firefox, i thought i will try to upgrade my port by my way... as i first run portmanager -s log to see what ports are outdated, and if that port seem critical, I will do

Re: portmanager question

2006-08-03 Thread Gerard Seibert
jan gestre wrote: sorry for this newbie question, i've been upgrading my box using portupgrade but recently i'm experiencing some wierd logs that can't be explained nor solved but luckily my box does not appear to be broken, i have a question though regarding portmanager, someone on this list

portmanager question

2006-08-02 Thread jan gestre
hi guys, sorry for this newbie question, i've been upgrading my box using portupgrade but recently i'm experiencing some wierd logs that can't be explained nor solved but luckily my box does not appear to be broken, i have a question though regarding portmanager, someone on this list recommended

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-29 Thread Francisco Reyes
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Jay O'Brien wrote: Francisco Reyes wrote: /usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_tree Interesting. Thanks! I wonder how that compares to portmanager. I have never used port manager, but pkg_tree only lets you see a tree of the ports. It doesn't help you manage them. I don't know if port

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-28 Thread RW
On Monday 28 March 2005 06:41, Jay O'Brien wrote: stheg olloydson wrote: Hello, They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements. cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 depends on gmake, gettext and libiconv. libiconv depends on libtool...and the foot bone's connected

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-28 Thread Randy Pratt
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 23:49:11 -0800 Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael C. Shultz wrote: It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented, but you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information on the various options. here is an example:

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-28 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Sunday 27 March 2005 11:49 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote: Michael C. Shultz wrote: It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented, but you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information on the various options. here is an example: #

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-28 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Monday 28 March 2005 05:50 am, Randy Pratt wrote: On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 23:49:11 -0800 Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael C. Shultz wrote: It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented, but you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-28 Thread Jay O'Brien
RW wrote: make seach is documented in man ports It sure is! THANK YOU! Jay ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-28 Thread Jay O'Brien
Randy, Mike: Thanks for the explanation. I hadn't considered a dependency that goes away after the dependent port is built. Now it makes perfect sense. Jay ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-28 Thread Francisco Reyes
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Jay O'Brien wrote: Alec Berryman wrote: Thanks for the heads up on 'make search', even if I can't find a complete description of the command. I find that it is referenced in the manual, however. Also check out the port /usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_tree It's very usefull to see

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-28 Thread Alex de Kruijff
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 06:20:00PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote: Updating a computer, pkg_info reported I only had two packages, cvsup-without-gui-16.1h and perl-5.8.5, both of which were out of date as reported by pkg_version. I tried to install portmanager, but it was not able to get the

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-28 Thread Jay O'Brien
Francisco Reyes wrote: On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Jay O'Brien wrote: Thanks for the heads up on 'make search', even if I can't find a complete description of the command. I find that it is referenced in the manual, however. Also check out the port /usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_tree It's very

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-28 Thread Jay O'Brien
Alex de Kruijff wrote: You told your system to install portmanager and the ports that it needs, but also all the ports that are based on it. Please check 'man portupgrade' about the options. Good point, That is a man page I hadn't thought to review. Thank you! Jay

Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-27 Thread Jay O'Brien
Updating a computer, pkg_info reported I only had two packages, cvsup-without-gui-16.1h and perl-5.8.5, both of which were out of date as reported by pkg_version. I tried to install portmanager, but it was not able to get the needed files from http://portmanager.sunsite.dk. So, I installed

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-27 Thread Alec Berryman
Jay O'Brien on 2005-03-27 18:20:00 -0800: Now, pkg_info says I have 10 packages installed; added were ezm3, gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool, portupgrade,ruby and ruby18. If these all required to make portupgrade or perl work, where is that reference? They are required to build and run

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-27 Thread Jay O'Brien
Alec Berryman wrote: Jay O'Brien on 2005-03-27 18:20:00 -0800: Now, pkg_info says I have 10 packages installed; added were ezm3, gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool, portupgrade,ruby and ruby18. If these all required to make portupgrade or perl work, where is that reference? They are

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-27 Thread Abu Khaled
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:08:56 -0800, Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alec Berryman wrote: Jay O'Brien on 2005-03-27 18:20:00 -0800: Now, pkg_info says I have 10 packages installed; added were ezm3, gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool, portupgrade,ruby and ruby18. If these all

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-27 Thread Jay O'Brien
Abu Khaled wrote: ezm3, gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool are the build dependencies for cvsup-without-gui. # cd /usr/ports # make search name=cvsup-without-gui Abu, I don't get that result. I only show ezm3-1.2. # cd /usr/ports # make search name=cvsup-without-gui Port:

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-27 Thread Abu Khaled
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 20:27:17 -0800, Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Abu Khaled wrote: ezm3, gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool are the build dependencies for cvsup-without-gui. # cd /usr/ports # make search name=cvsup-without-gui Abu, I don't get that result. I only show

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-27 Thread stheg olloydson
it was said: If you updated your soirces/ports cvsup then portupgrade did what you asked it to do. It Updated all outdated packages/ports and there dependencies. I'm convinced that you are right. However, why don't I show the other dependencies? Hello, They are recursive dependencies. Check

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-27 Thread Jay O'Brien
stheg olloydson wrote: Hello, They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements. cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 depends on gmake, gettext and libiconv. libiconv depends on libtool...and the foot bone's connected to the toe bone :). hth, stheg stheg, Thank

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-27 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Sunday 27 March 2005 09:41 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote: stheg olloydson wrote: Hello, They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements. cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 depends on gmake, gettext and libiconv. libiconv depends on libtool...and the foot bone's

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-27 Thread Abu Khaled
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:51:28 -0800, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 27 March 2005 09:41 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote: stheg olloydson wrote: Hello, They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements. cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 depends on gmake,

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-27 Thread stheg olloydson
it was said: But how does it work (/usr/ports/Makefile doesn't have a SEARCH statement) and is it documented somewhere, like in a MAN page? The handbook, ΒΆ4.3, mentions 'make search' but doesn't explain how it works. Hello, It uses /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk. I doubt the options in there

Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

2005-03-27 Thread Jay O'Brien
Michael C. Shultz wrote: It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented, but you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information on the various options. here is an example: # all-depends-list # - Show all directories which