On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:53:00 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Aryeh Friedman writes:
>
>> How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are
>> broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure
>> this will change soon)
>
> Your direct question was already an
Aryeh Friedman writes:
> How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are
> broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this
> will change soon)
Your direct question was already answered, but note that libreoffice is
not broken overall, just with cer
How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are
broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure
this
will change soon)
-x avoid building or updating ports that match this pattern. Can be
specified more than once.
2013-03-25 10:40, Aryeh Friedman skrev:
How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are
broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this
will change soon)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
On 03/25/2013 10:40, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are
broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this
will change soon)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
h
Just use -x switch
portmaster -ad -x libreoffice
2013/3/25 Aryeh Friedman :
> How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are
> broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this
> will change soon)
> ___
> f
How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are
broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this
will change soon)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:50:21 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, RW wrote:
>
> > -aRr isn't implied by -a, the rR options are ignored in the former.
> >
> > I think it's fairly clear that recursing through installed
> > packages with consistent dependecies isn't going to find a
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, RW wrote:
-aRr isn't implied by -a, the rR options are ignored in the former.
I think it's fairly clear that recursing through installed
packages with consistent dependecies isn't going to find a package
that isn't in the set of all installed packages.
That sentence makes
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 06:22:55 -0500
Jerry wrote:
> I don't see anything that specifically states the the "-R or -r"
> flags are in included with the "-a" flag; although I might be
> misinterpreting it. If it was implied i think it should have been
> better documented.
-aRr isn't implied by -a, th
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:11:50 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block articulated:
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
>
> > When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in
> > conjunction with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as
> > through as the "-u -p" flags with 'portmanger', it does a
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:11:50 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
>
> > When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in
> > conjunction with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as
> > through as the "-u -p" flags with 'portmanger', it does accompl
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in conjunction
with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as through as the
"-u -p" flags with 'portmanger', it does accomplish its goal.
Isn't portupgrade -a equivalent to -arR? I hope so, or I ha
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:21:59 -0700, Fred wrote:
Hello,
According to man portmaster the -a option will "Update all ports that
need updating". Does this apply to only installed ports or to
everything in /usr/ports?
It applies to installed ports. A common
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:31:11 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
> On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:21:59 -0700, Fred wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > According to man portmaster the -a option will "Update all ports
> > that need updating". Does this apply to only installed ports or to
> > everything in /usr/ports?
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:21:59 -0700, Fred wrote:
> Hello,
>
> According to man portmaster the -a option will "Update all ports that
> need updating". Does this apply to only installed ports or to
> everything in /usr/ports?
It applies to installed ports. A commonly used command to
upgrade them
Hello,
According to man portmaster the -a option will "Update all ports that
need updating". Does this apply to only installed ports or to
everything in /usr/ports?
Best regards,
Fred
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Mel wrote:
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote:
B. Cook wrote:
Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port?
If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use
a construct like this:
.if ${.CURDIR:M*/databa
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Mel wrote:
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote:
B. Cook wrote:
Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port?
...
If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use
a construct like this:
.if ${.CURDIR:M*
Mel wrote:
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote:
B. Cook wrote:
Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port?
...
If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use
a construct like this:
.if ${.CURDIR:M*/databases/mysql*}
WITH
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote:
> B. Cook wrote:
> > Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port?
> >
...
> If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use
> a construct like this:
>
> .if ${.CURDIR:M*/databases/mysql*}
> WIT
B. Cook wrote:
Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port?
For example if I use -m BUILD_STATIC=YES and -m BUILD_OPTIMIZED=YES for
mysql50-server.. other than remembering that I did that.. is there
someway to have portmaster read its portmaster.rc and get that information?
Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port?
For example if I use -m BUILD_STATIC=YES and -m BUILD_OPTIMIZED=YES for
mysql50-server.. other than remembering that I did that.. is there
someway to have portmaster read its portmaster.rc and get that information?
__
Terry Sposato wrote:
Hi,
I recently did a binary upgrade from 6.2-RELEASE to 6.3-RELEASE and
everything went smoothly. For good measure I decided to do an upgrade
of all of my installed ports with the following command:
sudo portmaster -Rfda
It quit out when failing to build the ImageMagick
Hi,
I recently did a binary upgrade from 6.2-RELEASE to 6.3-RELEASE and
everything went smoothly. For good measure I decided to do an upgrade of
all of my installed ports with the following command:
sudo portmaster -Rfda
It quit out when failing to build the ImageMagick port which is fine,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:50:10 -0600
James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 10:11 -0400, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >i been using portmaster for a while when upgrading my ports,
> > often times when there are some problems in certain ports, e.g.
> > jdk, i will use "-x j
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 10:11 -0400, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
> hi,
>i been using portmaster for a while when upgrading my ports, often
> times when there are some problems in certain ports, e.g. jdk, i will
> use "-x jdk" so i can deal with it later. but when there are two or
> more of them that ne
hi,
i been using portmaster for a while when upgrading my ports, often
times when there are some problems in certain ports, e.g. jdk, i will
use "-x jdk" so i can deal with it later. but when there are two or
more of them that need special attention, i cant find a way to do it
right, i tried "-x
28 matches
Mail list logo
