Re: stupid portmaster question

2013-03-25 Thread Walter Hurry
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:53:00 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Aryeh Friedman writes: > >> How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are >> broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure >> this will change soon) > > Your direct question was already an

Re: stupid portmaster question

2013-03-25 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Aryeh Friedman writes: > How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are > broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this > will change soon) Your direct question was already answered, but note that libreoffice is not broken overall, just with cer

Re: stupid portmaster question

2013-03-25 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this will change soon) -x avoid building or updating ports that match this pattern. Can be specified more than once.

Re: stupid portmaster question

2013-03-25 Thread Leslie Jensen
2013-03-25 10:40, Aryeh Friedman skrev: How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this will change soon) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list ht

Re: stupid portmaster question

2013-03-25 Thread Julien Cigar
On 03/25/2013 10:40, Aryeh Friedman wrote: How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this will change soon) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list h

Re: stupid portmaster question

2013-03-25 Thread David Demelier
Just use -x switch portmaster -ad -x libreoffice 2013/3/25 Aryeh Friedman : > How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are > broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this > will change soon) > ___ > f

stupid portmaster question

2013-03-25 Thread Aryeh Friedman
How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this will change soon) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-08 Thread RW
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:50:21 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, RW wrote: > > > -aRr isn't implied by -a, the rR options are ignored in the former. > > > > I think it's fairly clear that recursing through installed > > packages with consistent dependecies isn't going to find a

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-08 Thread Warren Block
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, RW wrote: -aRr isn't implied by -a, the rR options are ignored in the former. I think it's fairly clear that recursing through installed packages with consistent dependecies isn't going to find a package that isn't in the set of all installed packages. That sentence makes

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-08 Thread RW
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 06:22:55 -0500 Jerry wrote: > I don't see anything that specifically states the the "-R or -r" > flags are in included with the "-a" flag; although I might be > misinterpreting it. If it was implied i think it should have been > better documented. -aRr isn't implied by -a, th

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-08 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:11:50 -0700 (MST) Warren Block articulated: > On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote: > > > When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in > > conjunction with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as > > through as the "-u -p" flags with 'portmanger', it does a

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-08 Thread RW
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:11:50 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote: > > > When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in > > conjunction with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as > > through as the "-u -p" flags with 'portmanger', it does accompl

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-07 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote: When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in conjunction with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as through as the "-u -p" flags with 'portmanger', it does accomplish its goal. Isn't portupgrade -a equivalent to -arR? I hope so, or I ha

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-07 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Polytropon wrote: On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:21:59 -0700, Fred wrote: Hello, According to man portmaster the -a option will "Update all ports that need updating". Does this apply to only installed ports or to everything in /usr/ports? It applies to installed ports. A common

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-07 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:31:11 +0100 Polytropon articulated: > On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:21:59 -0700, Fred wrote: > > Hello, > > > > According to man portmaster the -a option will "Update all ports > > that need updating". Does this apply to only installed ports or to > > everything in /usr/ports?

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-07 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:21:59 -0700, Fred wrote: > Hello, > > According to man portmaster the -a option will "Update all ports that > need updating". Does this apply to only installed ports or to > everything in /usr/ports? It applies to installed ports. A commonly used command to upgrade them

portmaster question

2010-11-07 Thread Fred
Hello, According to man portmaster the -a option will "Update all ports that need updating". Does this apply to only installed ports or to everything in /usr/ports? Best regards, Fred ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.fre

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster question

2008-12-28 Thread Sergey Kovalev
Matthew Seaman wrote: Mel wrote: On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote: B. Cook wrote: Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port? If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use a construct like this: .if ${.CURDIR:M*/databa

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster question

2008-12-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
Matthew Seaman wrote: Mel wrote: On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote: B. Cook wrote: Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port? ... If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use a construct like this: .if ${.CURDIR:M*

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster question

2008-12-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
Mel wrote: On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote: B. Cook wrote: Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port? ... If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use a construct like this: .if ${.CURDIR:M*/databases/mysql*} WITH

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster question

2008-12-27 Thread Mel
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote: > B. Cook wrote: > > Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port? > > ... > If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use > a construct like this: > > .if ${.CURDIR:M*/databases/mysql*} > WIT

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster question

2008-12-24 Thread Matthew Seaman
B. Cook wrote: Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port? For example if I use -m BUILD_STATIC=YES and -m BUILD_OPTIMIZED=YES for mysql50-server.. other than remembering that I did that.. is there someway to have portmaster read its portmaster.rc and get that information?

ports-mgmt/portmaster question

2008-12-24 Thread B. Cook
Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port? For example if I use -m BUILD_STATIC=YES and -m BUILD_OPTIMIZED=YES for mysql50-server.. other than remembering that I did that.. is there someway to have portmaster read its portmaster.rc and get that information? __

Re: portmaster question

2008-04-02 Thread Eric
Terry Sposato wrote: Hi, I recently did a binary upgrade from 6.2-RELEASE to 6.3-RELEASE and everything went smoothly. For good measure I decided to do an upgrade of all of my installed ports with the following command: sudo portmaster -Rfda It quit out when failing to build the ImageMagick

portmaster question

2008-04-02 Thread Terry Sposato
Hi, I recently did a binary upgrade from 6.2-RELEASE to 6.3-RELEASE and everything went smoothly. For good measure I decided to do an upgrade of all of my installed ports with the following command: sudo portmaster -Rfda It quit out when failing to build the ImageMagick port which is fine,

Re: portmaster question

2007-10-25 Thread RW
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:50:10 -0600 James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 10:11 -0400, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > > > hi, > >i been using portmaster for a while when upgrading my ports, > > often times when there are some problems in certain ports, e.g. > > jdk, i will use "-x j

Re: portmaster question

2007-10-25 Thread James
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 10:11 -0400, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > hi, >i been using portmaster for a while when upgrading my ports, often > times when there are some problems in certain ports, e.g. jdk, i will > use "-x jdk" so i can deal with it later. but when there are two or > more of them that ne

portmaster question

2007-10-25 Thread Tsu-Fan Cheng
hi, i been using portmaster for a while when upgrading my ports, often times when there are some problems in certain ports, e.g. jdk, i will use "-x jdk" so i can deal with it later. but when there are two or more of them that need special attention, i cant find a way to do it right, i tried "-x