--- James Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:34:57 -0800
From: Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ...
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kiffin Gish
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Peter wrote:
--- James Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:34:57 -0800
From: Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ...
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kiffin Gish
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message
I would like to know the difference between running:
portupgrade -arR
and
portmanager -u
Just curious is all, thanks.
--
Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
--- Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know the difference between running:
portupgrade -arR
and
portmanager -u
Just curious is all, thanks.
I have found portmanager to be more intelligent. When
you run it it takes a look at all installed ports and
then it
On Saturday 04 March 2006 19:20, Peter wrote:
--- Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know the difference between running:
portupgrade -arR
and
portmanager -u
Just curious is all, thanks.
I have found portmanager to be more intelligent. When
you run it it
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:34:57 -0800
From: Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ...
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Francisco Reyes wrote:
/usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_tree
Interesting. Thanks! I wonder how that compares to portmanager.
I have never used port manager, but pkg_tree only lets you see a tree of
the ports. It doesn't help you manage them. I don't know if port
On Monday 28 March 2005 06:41, Jay O'Brien wrote:
stheg olloydson wrote:
Hello,
They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements.
cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 depends on gmake,
gettext and libiconv. libiconv depends on libtool...and the foot
bone's connected
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 23:49:11 -0800
Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented, but
you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information
on the various options.
here is an example:
On Sunday 27 March 2005 11:49 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented,
but
you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information
on the various options.
here is an example:
#
On Monday 28 March 2005 05:50 am, Randy Pratt wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 23:49:11 -0800
Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
It would be nice if the ports make options were better
documented, but
you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find
RW wrote:
make seach is documented in man ports
It sure is! THANK YOU!
Jay
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Randy, Mike:
Thanks for the explanation. I hadn't considered a dependency
that goes away after the dependent port is built. Now it
makes perfect sense.
Jay
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Alec Berryman wrote:
Thanks for the heads up on 'make search', even if I can't find a complete
description of the command. I find that it is referenced in the manual,
however.
Also check out the port
/usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_tree
It's very usefull to see
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 06:20:00PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Updating a computer, pkg_info reported I only had two packages,
cvsup-without-gui-16.1h and perl-5.8.5, both of which were out
of date as reported by pkg_version.
I tried to install portmanager, but it was not able to get the
Francisco Reyes wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Thanks for the heads up on 'make search', even if I can't find a complete
description of the command. I find that it is referenced in the manual,
however.
Also check out the port
/usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_tree
It's very
Alex de Kruijff wrote:
You told your system to install portmanager and the ports that
it needs, but also all the ports that are based on it. Please
check 'man portupgrade' about the options.
Good point, That is a man page I hadn't thought to review.
Thank you!
Jay
Updating a computer, pkg_info reported I only had two packages,
cvsup-without-gui-16.1h and perl-5.8.5, both of which were out
of date as reported by pkg_version.
I tried to install portmanager, but it was not able to get the
needed files from http://portmanager.sunsite.dk.
So, I installed
Jay O'Brien on 2005-03-27 18:20:00 -0800:
Now, pkg_info says I have 10 packages installed; added were ezm3,
gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool, portupgrade,ruby and ruby18. If
these all required to make portupgrade or perl work, where is that
reference?
They are required to build and run
Alec Berryman wrote:
Jay O'Brien on 2005-03-27 18:20:00 -0800:
Now, pkg_info says I have 10 packages installed; added were ezm3,
gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool, portupgrade,ruby and ruby18. If
these all required to make portupgrade or perl work, where is that
reference?
They are
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:08:56 -0800, Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alec Berryman wrote:
Jay O'Brien on 2005-03-27 18:20:00 -0800:
Now, pkg_info says I have 10 packages installed; added were ezm3,
gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool, portupgrade,ruby and ruby18. If
these all
Abu Khaled wrote:
ezm3, gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool are the build dependencies for
cvsup-without-gui.
# cd /usr/ports
# make search name=cvsup-without-gui
Abu, I don't get that result. I only show ezm3-1.2.
# cd /usr/ports
# make search name=cvsup-without-gui
Port:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 20:27:17 -0800, Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Abu Khaled wrote:
ezm3, gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool are the build dependencies for
cvsup-without-gui.
# cd /usr/ports
# make search name=cvsup-without-gui
Abu, I don't get that result. I only show
it was said:
If you updated your soirces/ports cvsup then portupgrade did
what you asked it to do. It Updated all outdated
packages/ports
and there dependencies.
I'm convinced that you are right. However, why don't I show the
other dependencies?
Hello,
They are recursive dependencies. Check
stheg olloydson wrote:
Hello,
They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements.
cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 depends on gmake,
gettext and libiconv. libiconv depends on libtool...and the foot
bone's connected to the toe bone :).
hth,
stheg
stheg,
Thank
On Sunday 27 March 2005 09:41 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
stheg olloydson wrote:
Hello,
They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements.
cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 depends on gmake,
gettext and libiconv. libiconv depends on libtool...and the foot
bone's
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:51:28 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 27 March 2005 09:41 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
stheg olloydson wrote:
Hello,
They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements.
cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 depends on gmake,
it was said:
But how does it work (/usr/ports/Makefile doesn't have a
SEARCH statement) and is it documented somewhere, like in a MAN
page?
The handbook, ΒΆ4.3, mentions 'make search' but doesn't explain
how it works.
Hello,
It uses /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk. I doubt the options in there
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented, but
you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information
on the various options.
here is an example:
# all-depends-list
# - Show all directories which
On 28 Dec Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Portmanager only addresses that one issue and for the forseeable
future that is where all the focus will be, only on correctly updating
ports.
Am I to understand correctly that portmanager _always_ updates ALL the
old ports? A 'pormanager -u sylpheed' is not
On Saturday 01 January 2005 04:30 am, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
On 28 Dec Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Portmanager only addresses that one issue and for the forseeable
future that is where all the focus will be, only on correctly
updating ports.
Am I to understand correctly that portmanager
Does portmanager handle packages? If not any plans to do so? I would be happy
to help with testing.
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Portupgrade has one serious flaw in my opinion and that is running
something like pkgdb -F damages the port installation database as
far as
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 10:03 am, you wrote:
Does portmanager handle packages? If not any plans to do so? I would
be happy to help with testing.
portmanager only handles packages in that it builds back up packages of
each port it updates, these packages are correctly build for your
Right now portmanager is upgrading kdelibs and I'm still using it. The
only problem that might occur is between the deinstall/reinstall steps
I'll be missing the libraries for about a minute, when this happens I
just wait untill its finished reinstalling then continue.
Here is a recap of
On Saturday 25 December 2004 04:53 am, Peter Schuller wrote:
Right now portmanager is upgrading kdelibs and I'm still using it.
The only problem that might occur is between the
deinstall/reinstall steps I'll be missing the libraries for about a
minute, when this happens I just wait untill
On Friday 24 December 2004 07:38, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 11:16 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup.
Following the Dru
RW wrote:
On Friday 24 December 2004 07:38, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 11:16 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup.
Following the
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:02:30 -0800, Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
On Friday 24 December 2004 07:38, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 11:16 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
On Friday 24 December 2004 07:54 am, RW wrote:
On Friday 24 December 2004 07:38, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 11:16 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to
That is indeed the case with portmanager. Sometimes it is a waste
of time to rebuild everthing when a dependency changes, and sometimes
it is the right thing to do, portmanager assumes it is always the right
thing to do. One way this has proved to be a benefit is I've never
had to run the
On Friday 24 December 2004 03:52 pm, Peter Schuller wrote:
That is indeed the case with portmanager. Sometimes it is a waste
of time to rebuild everthing when a dependency changes, and
sometimes it is the right thing to do, portmanager assumes it is
always the right thing to do. One way
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:01:58PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup.
Following the Dru Lavigne article on portupgrade at
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html?page=1
I installed portupgrade and then ran
On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup.
Following the Dru Lavigne article on portupgrade at
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html?page=1
I installed portupgrade and then ran portsdb
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup.
Following the Dru Lavigne article on portupgrade at
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html?page=1
I installed portupgrade
On Thursday 23 December 2004 11:16 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup.
Following the Dru Lavigne article on portupgrade at
45 matches
Mail list logo
