Re: question on IP alias/broadcast

2002-11-20 Thread Rob O'Donnell
At 08:16 17/11/2002 +, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:04:57PM +0700, budsz wrote: On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 04:21:34PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: expressed as a hexadecimal or even decimal integer. thus: 192.168.100.1 is the same as 0xc0a86401 or 3232261121

Re: question on IP alias/broadcast

2002-11-17 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:04:57PM +0700, budsz wrote: On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 04:21:34PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: expressed as a hexadecimal or even decimal integer. thus: 192.168.100.1 is the same as 0xc0a86401 or 3232261121

Re: question on IP alias/broadcast

2002-11-17 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 06:03:10PM +0700, budsz wrote: Thank you for your explaination, But it's valid if I use [http/ftp/mailto/https]://interger_decimal ?, What part RFC explain this is? It's application dependent. Most modern web browsers (Netscape 6, Mozilla, probably the latest IE)

question on IP alias/broadcast

2002-11-16 Thread J.D. Bronson
I setup an alias statment in rc.conf and it seems to work fine.. but I have a question on the broadcast IP: em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 options=3rxcsum,txcsum inet 192.168.100.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.100.255 inet