On Sep 23, 2008, at 3:33 PM, B. Cook wrote:
I have slices a, d, e, f, g, and h.. I wouldn't be able to get one
more would I?
using gmirror and RELENG_7_0..
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:33:41 -0400
B. Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have slices a, d, e, f, g, and h.. I wouldn't be able to get one
> more would I?
>
I've never tried it myself, but I've heard that it's possible to
nest FreeBSD partitions indefinitely - leading to an unlimited number
of
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 03:33:41PM -0400, B. Cook wrote:
> I have slices a, d, e, f, g, and h.. I wouldn't be able to get one
> more would I?
>
> using gmirror and RELENG_7_0..
First I guess you actually mean partition, not slice.
(Partitions are usually labeled a, d, e, ..., while slices
are n
On Sep 23, 2008, at 12:33 PM, B. Cook wrote:
I have slices a, d, e, f, g, and h.. I wouldn't be able to get one
more would I?
Not safely, no-- you should leave b for swap and c for the whole
partition. Speaking of which, if you've got unallocated disk space
available, you can create anoth
I have slices a, d, e, f, g, and h.. I wouldn't be able to get one
more would I?
using gmirror and RELENG_7_0..
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
