On 10-Jun-2012, at 6:13 AM, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 9 June 2012 18:38, RW wrote:
>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 07:22:50 -0600
>> Gary Aitken wrote:
>>
>>> I reconfigured my ssd filesystem with the /var partition of size
>>> 512M. Unfortunately, something in portsnap or the ports tree in
>>> gen
On 9 June 2012 18:38, RW wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 07:22:50 -0600
> Gary Aitken wrote:
>
>> I reconfigured my ssd filesystem with the /var partition of size
>> 512M. Unfortunately, something in portsnap or the ports tree in
>> general uses a boatload of small files, and i ran out of inodes. C
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 07:22:50 -0600
Gary Aitken wrote:
> I reconfigured my ssd filesystem with the /var partition of size
> 512M. Unfortunately, something in portsnap or the ports tree in
> general uses a boatload of small files, and i ran out of inodes. Can
> anyone recommend an appropriate size
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Gary Aitken wrote:
> I reconfigured my ssd filesystem with the /var partition of size 512M.
> Unfortunately, something in portsnap or the ports tree in general uses a
> boatload of small files, and i ran out of inodes. Can anyone recommend an
> appropriate size
I reconfigured my ssd filesystem with the /var partition of size 512M.
Unfortunately, something in portsnap or the ports tree in general uses a
boatload of small files, and i ran out of inodes. Can anyone recommend an
appropriate size for the newfs -i value? 1024? less?
Thanks,
Gary
__
