Running subversion as root works fine, but under user 'svn' I get a load of
permission problems, e.g.
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Cannot open /usr/local/lib/apache2/libaprutil-0.so.9
I fixed this by adding svn to group wheel, but am not sure if this is 'the
right way'.
Is there a standard solution
On 2005-11-01 05:57, Cerion Armour-Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running subversion as root works fine, but under user 'svn' I get a load of
permission problems, e.g.
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Cannot open
/usr/local/lib/apache2/libaprutil-0.so.9
I fixed this by adding svn to group wheel,
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:41:45 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote
On 2005-11-01 05:57, Cerion Armour-Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running subversion as root works fine, but under user 'svn' I get a load of
permission problems, e.g.
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Cannot open
On 2005-11-01 07:50, Cerion Armour-Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:41:45 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote
On 2005-11-01 05:57, Cerion Armour-Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running subversion as root works fine, but under user 'svn' I get a load of
permission problems, e.g.
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:56:17 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote
On 2005-11-01 07:50, Cerion Armour-Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:41:45 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote
On 2005-11-01 05:57, Cerion Armour-Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running subversion as root works fine, but
On 2005-11-01 08:16, Cerion Armour-Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:56:17 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote
(2) Change the permissions of libaprutil*.so* files to 0755,
which would allow subversion to access the shared
libraries without being in the
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:25:57 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote
On 2005-11-01 08:16, Cerion Armour-Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:56:17 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote
(2) Change the permissions of libaprutil*.so* files to 0755,
which would allow subversion
On 2005-11-01 08:32, Cerion Armour-Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:25:57 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote
If you used the standard Ports stuff to install these and they
have these broken permissions, it may be a side-effect of a
broken umask setting for the root user.
What
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:40:47PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-11-01 08:32, Cerion Armour-Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:25:57 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote
If you used the standard Ports stuff to install these and they
have these broken permissions, it may
On 2005-11-01 18:04, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:40:47PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-11-01 08:32, Cerion Armour-Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:25:57 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote
If you used the standard Ports stuff to
10 matches
Mail list logo
