2009/12/12 andrew clarke :
> On Fri 2009-12-11 16:57:06 UTC-0500, Steven Friedrich (free...@insightbb.com)
> wrote:
>
>> I installed FreeBSD to another partition, so I could check it out.
>> I selected All sources and binaries and KDE4.
>>
>> When I tried startx, it complained that it didn't exist
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:37:37 -0500, Steven Friedrich
wrote:
> I thought KDE4 would have caused a dependency on X, but I guess since there
> have been two choices, XFree and Xorg, you have to manually select one or the
> other.
It is possible to run XFree86 - the X that "just works" (TM)?
I'm n
On Fri 2009-12-11 16:57:06 UTC-0500, Steven Friedrich (free...@insightbb.com)
wrote:
> I installed FreeBSD to another partition, so I could check it out.
> I selected All sources and binaries and KDE4.
>
> When I tried startx, it complained that it didn't exist.
> It's just a script, so I copied
On Friday 11 December 2009 04:56:39 pm you wrote:
> Well, you now need to either select X during install or install
> it from ports after the installation.
>
> jerry
>
I thought KDE4 would have caused a dependency on X, but I guess since there
have been two choices, XFree and Xorg, you have
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 04:57:06PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote:
> I installed FreeBSD to another partition, so I could check it out.
> I selected All sources and binaries and KDE4.
>
> When I tried startx, it complained that it didn't exist.
> It's just a script, so I copied it over from my 7.2
I installed FreeBSD to another partition, so I could check it out.
I selected All sources and binaries and KDE4.
When I tried startx, it complained that it didn't exist.
It's just a script, so I copied it over from my 7.2p5 partition.
Now it complains that xinit doesn't exist.
Why didn't these tw
