Re: Why ue0 do ARP on non local address when using static route?

2013-02-13 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Jin Guojun writes: > man page says that ethernet-address (MAC) + fully-qualified-host-name (FQHN). > The issue is that host cannot resolve the address by using FQHN, thus no ARP > any > more, but no traffic either. > > After adding FQDH in the /etc/hosts file then, ARP request uses FQHN instea

Re: Why ue0 do ARP on non local address when using static route?

2013-02-13 Thread Jin Guojun
: questions freebsd Sent: Wed, February 13, 2013 2:33:57 PM Subject: Re: Why ue0 do ARP on non local address when using static route? On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Jin Guojun wrote: > /etc/ethers does not help because there is no way resolve the IP by QFHN in >ethers. I'm not sure wha

Re: Why ue0 do ARP on non local address when using static route?

2013-02-13 Thread Chuck Swiger
e dynamically. > The correct way is to use router IP (10.234.37.1) between 10.234.37.0 and > 10.227.148.0 instead of interface IP (10.234.37.80) for static route. Assuming there's a router at 10.234.37.1 which knows how to get to 10.227.1

Re: Why ue0 do ARP on non local address when using static route?

2013-02-13 Thread Lowell Gilbert
it has > problem > to talk to a remote network or host (10.227.148.0/24) via eu0 interface. > When a remote host ping this host or this host ping that remote host, ARP > request is always showing up. > A static route is set and remote host is no part of the local sub net, why > A

Re: Why ue0 do ARP on non local address when using static route?

2013-02-13 Thread Jin Guojun
/etc/ethers does not help because there is no way resolve the IP by QFHN in ethers. The correct way is to use router IP (10.234.37.1) between 10.234.37.0 and 10.227.148.0 instead of interface IP (10.234.37.80) for static route. From: Chuck Swiger To: Jin

Re: Why ue0 do ARP on non local address when using static route?

2013-02-13 Thread Chuck Swiger
a eu0 interface. > When a remote host ping this host or this host ping that remote host, ARP > request is always showing up. > A static route is set and remote host is no part of the local sub net, why > ARP > is going on? You've told the interface that it can reach 10.227.148.52

Why ue0 do ARP on non local address when using static route?

2013-02-13 Thread Jin Guojun
(10.227.148.0/24) via eu0 interface. When a remote host ping this host or this host ping that remote host, ARP request is always showing up. A static route is set and remote host is no part of the local sub net, why ARP is going on? Is any sysctl parameter can fix this problem? -Jin Internet

Re: Adding a Static Route to rc.conf?

2012-05-03 Thread Noel
On 5/3/2012 1:54 PM, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Noel > wrote: > > > > Indeed, I should have mentioned that if you have freebsd-8x or > earlier, this feature isn't built-in but can be easily added: > > http://freebsd.1045

Re: Adding a Static Route to rc.conf?

2012-05-03 Thread Michael Sierchio
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Noel wrote: > > Indeed, I should have mentioned that if you have freebsd-8x or > earlier, this feature isn't built-in but can be easily added: > > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Re-rc-8-script-waiting-for-the-network-to-become-usable-td4242157.html > Or the

Re: Adding a Static Route to rc.conf?

2012-05-03 Thread Noel
ness.com>> wrote: > >> How do add a static route to rc.conf? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Chris Maness > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-routing.html > > > > see section 32.2.5.2 Persistent

Re: Adding a Static Route to rc.conf?

2012-05-03 Thread Chris Maness
>> >> # Add Internal Net 2 as a static route >> static_routes="internalnet2" >> route_internalnet2="-net 44.18.44.0/24 192.168.1.33" >> >> to rc.conf per the section above.  I rebooted and it was a no go.  Did >> I miss something? >

Re: Adding a Static Route to rc.conf?

2012-05-03 Thread Noel
On 5/3/2012 11:45 AM, Chris Maness wrote: > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Chris Maness wrote: >> How do add a static route to rc.conf? >> >> Thanks, >> Chris Maness > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-routing.html > > see section 32.2.5.2 Pers

Adding a Static Route to rc.conf?

2012-05-03 Thread Chris Maness
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Chris Maness wrote: > How do add a static route to rc.conf? > > Thanks, > Chris Maness http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-routing.html see section 32.2.5.2 Persistent Configuration -- Noel Jones > I added: # Add Internal Net 2 as

Re: Adding a Static Route to rc.conf?

2012-05-02 Thread Chris Maness
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Chris Maness wrote: > How do add a static route to rc.conf? > > Thanks, > Chris Maness http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-routing.html see section 32.2.5.2 Persistent Configuration -- Noel Jones > Than

Re: Adding a Static Route to rc.conf?

2012-05-01 Thread Noel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/1/2012 10:31 AM, Chris Maness wrote: > How do add a static route to rc.conf? > > Thanks, > Chris Maness > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd

Adding a Static Route to rc.conf?

2012-05-01 Thread Chris Maness
How do add a static route to rc.conf? Thanks, Chris Maness ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-23 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:55:58PM +0200, Коньков Евгений wrote: К> >> vlan74: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 К> >>        options=3 К> >>        ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 К> >>        inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd К> >>        inet 10.1.26.1 netmask 0xfe00 broadca

Re[2]: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-21 Thread Коньков Евгений
Здравствуйте, Ivan. Вы писали 21 февраля 2012 г., 0:45:33: II> 2012/2/20 Коньков Евгений : >> >> vlan74: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >>        options=3 >>        ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 >>        inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd >>        inet 10.1.26.1 netmask 0xf

Re[2]: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-21 Thread Коньков Евгений
Здравствуйте, Matthew. Вы писали 21 февраля 2012 г., 14:10:37: MS> On 20/02/2012 20:06, Коньков Евгений wrote: >> >> vlan74: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >> options=3 >> ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 >> inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd >> i

Re: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-21 Thread Adam Vande More
2012/2/20 Коньков Евгений > > vlan74: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu > 1500 >options=3 >ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 >inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd >inet 10.1.26.1 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 >inet 10.1.26.3 netmask 0xf

Re: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-21 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 20/02/2012 20:06, Коньков Евгений wrote: > > vlan74: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=3 > ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 > inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd > inet 10.1.26.1 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 > inet 10.1.

Re: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-21 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 2/21/12 9:34 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 21/02/2012 08:14, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> I don't know if it's a bug or intended, but I do know you should use >> /32 aliases for additional IPs, not your original netmask. > > Actually, it's optional nowadays. Either way works. > Well idk,

Re: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-21 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 21/02/2012 08:14, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > I don't know if it's a bug or intended, but I do know you should use > /32 aliases for additional IPs, not your original netmask. Actually, it's optional nowadays. Either way works. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phi

Re: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-21 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 20 Feb 2012, at 21:06, Коньков Евгений wrote: > > vlan74: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >options=3 >ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 >inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd >inet 10.1.26.1 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 >inet 1

deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-20 Thread Коньков Евгений
vlan74: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=3 ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd inet 10.1.26.1 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 inet 10.1.26.3 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 nd6

Re: ipv6 static route.

2010-01-25 Thread Peter Ankerstål
On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC) wrote: > On 1/25/2010 12:15 PM, Peter Ankerstål wrote: >> How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf? >> >> This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 >> 2003:16c8:dc1e::2 >> >> and I use this in rc.conf:

Re: ipv6 static route.

2010-01-25 Thread Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC)
On 1/25/2010 12:15 PM, Peter Ankerstål wrote: How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf? This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 2003:16c8:dc1e::2 and I use this in rc.conf: ipv6_static_routes="2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 2003:16c8:dc1e::2" Do it li

ipv6 static route.

2010-01-25 Thread Peter Ankerstål
How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf? This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 2003:16c8:dc1e::2 and I use this in rc.conf: ipv6_static_routes="2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 2003:16c8:dc1e::2" but it does not set the correct routes. -- Peter Ankerstål

Re: static route

2007-03-31 Thread Lowell Gilbert
bernadette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it possible to setup a static route while the "routes not in table > but not freed" (obtained doing netstat -rs) value is not to 0 ? Yes. > By the way what does mean "routes not in table but not freed" ? (If I > k

static route

2007-03-29 Thread bernadette
Hi everybody, I have a question for you : Is it possible to setup a static route while the "routes not in table but not freed" (obtained doing netstat -rs) value is not to 0 ? By the way what does mean "routes not in table but not freed" ? (If I knew how to make one, I

Static route between two machines.

2004-06-01 Thread David Fuchs
Hello, In a little test scenario to learn more about routing, I've come up with the folling setup consisting of two machines, directly connected via two separate interfaces on each machine: 172.16.100.10 <---> 172.16.100.25 (fxp0) (ed0) Host ABC

Re: add a static route at boot time

2002-12-24 Thread Marc Schneiders
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, at 00:44 [=GMT+0100], Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Could somebody please confirm that the place to add a static route at > boot time is rc.conf? For instance > static_routes="192.168.1.0/24 192.168.0.1 Maybe that works. This worked for me (just in case the abov

add a static route at boot time

2002-12-24 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Could somebody please confirm that the place to add a static route at boot time is rc.conf? For instance static_routes="192.168.1.0/24 192.168.0.1 Is there a way to ensure that the route is added before all network daemons are started? Thanks, /per olof To Unsubscribe: send mail to [