On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 06:40:14PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:25:54PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> > On 2010.06.03 19:46, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > >
> > > If anything, it's *you* who took things into the realm of politics by
> > > pulling it out of the signature block w
On 2010.06.03 20:40, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:25:54PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> ...here's an example... use vi(m). It solves ALL of the world's problems.
>
> I'm beginning to think nvi, in particular, might do so. For one thing,
> it has a friendlier license (since w
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:25:54PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> On 2010.06.03 19:46, Chad Perrin wrote:
> >
> > If anything, it's *you* who took things into the realm of politics by
> > pulling it out of the signature block where it belonged.
>
> Nicely put Chad.
Thanks!
>
> ...here's an ex
On 2010.06.03 19:46, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:49:04PM +0200, Richard T C Farnes wrote:
>> To Matthias Apitz
[ ...snip ...]
>> Yours sincerely
>> Richard Farnes
>
> I don't recall any "netiquette" rules about making your signature block
> on-topic. Aren't you getting a bit
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:49:04PM +0200, Richard T C Farnes wrote:
> To Matthias Apitz
> I read with interest your contribution and those of others in text editor
> usage. In this I do not have much to contribute as I am so far perfectly
> happy with vi.
> BUT I noticed your political comment a
To Matthias Apitz
I read with interest your contribution and those of others in text editor
usage. In this I do not have much to contribute as I am so far perfectly
happy with vi.
BUT I noticed your political comment at the end of your contribution. I find
this out of place as this questions si
