Re: tree-based quotas for UFS/UFS2?

2003-06-30 Thread Chris Dillon
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Ryan Dooley wrote: Has anybody done work on Tree-based quotas for UFS/UFS2? As an administrator I'm finding more and more reasons that such a thing would be a good thing. By tree-based you mean the ability to define this directory and everything under it gets X amount

Re: tree-based quotas for UFS/UFS2?

2003-06-30 Thread Ryan Dooley
By tree-based you mean the ability to define this directory and everything under it gets X amount of storage, regardless of owner? If so, I also wish this ability existed, and I've talked with several administrators of ISPs that sorely need that ability as well. If it is a monumental

Re: tree-based quotas for UFS/UFS2?

2003-06-30 Thread Dan Pelleg
Chris Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Ryan Dooley wrote: Has anybody done work on Tree-based quotas for UFS/UFS2? As an administrator I'm finding more and more reasons that such a thing would be a good thing. The following is not a real solution

tree-based quotas for UFS/UFS2?

2003-06-26 Thread Ryan Dooley
Hey, Has anybody done work on Tree-based quotas for UFS/UFS2? As an administrator I'm finding more and more reasons that such a thing would be a good thing. Cheers, Ryan ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman