of the VPN. There are no
errors logged anywhere, and adding rpcbind_flags=-l -L just tells me that
the local servers are contacted.
Oct 11 09:43:58 nl101 rpcbind: connect from 172.16.1.21 to
getport/addr(mountd)
Oct 11 09:44:07 nl101 rpcbind: connect from 172.16.1.21 to dump()
Oct 11 09:44:15 nl101 rpcbind
,
and
it worked fine until I ran my lock test (perl script). Which really
sucks
because I've already gotten just about everything else I need working :(
I cannot get a lock from any OS on this side of the VPN. There are no
errors logged anywhere, and adding rpcbind_flags=-l -L just tells me
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Terje Elde te...@elde.net wrote:
On 18. aug. 2013, at 02.43, Adam Vande More wrote:
What about SSL/TLS for example? How would the router swap the header
in an encrypted session?
Same as it would any sessions since only the payload is encrypted. What
On Aug 20, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
and while you can rewrite that on a NAT-box using an application level
gateway, you can not do that if the session is using SSL or TLS.
Complete BS.
This seems to come down to a misunderstanding in the examples drawn
this kind of
caper is used to sort them out when they collide. Paying for a Cisco VPN
could easily work out cheaper than reconfiguring a large corporate LAN,
but I don't have the budget for either. Unfortunately this goes beyond
my current knowledge of FreeBSD's networking layers so I may
them out when they collide. Paying for a Cisco VPN
could easily work out cheaper than reconfiguring a large corporate LAN, but I
don't have the budget for either.
This kind of thing *can* be used to sort out colliding subnets, but that
doesn't mean it *should* be used to resolve the issue(s
On 18. aug. 2013, at 02.43, Adam Vande More wrote:
What about SSL/TLS for example? How would the router swap the header in an
encrypted session?
Same as it would any sessions since only the payload is encrypted. What
Frank calls basic nat, most people call static nat(at least people
this kind of
caper is used to sort them out when they collide. Paying for a Cisco VPN could
easily work out cheaper than reconfiguring a large corporate LAN, but I don't
have the budget for either.
This kind of thing *can* be used to sort out colliding subnets, but that
doesn't mean it *should
but if you're bigger than Fred-in-shed
you're going to get them.
What I'm asking (VPN NAT) is possible, and a recognised solution to the
problem I've described - the big boys do it all the time, apparently. My
local Cisco expert was able to talk me through doing it, but only on IOS
:-( Basically
On 17. aug. 2013, at 16:37, Frank Leonhardt freebsd-...@fjl.co.uk wrote:
This is just the sort of problem Google will have when it buys Facebook :-)
Probably not. If Google were to buy Facebook, I'm confident they'd be able to
renumber their networks if they have to.
Your explanation of the
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Terje Elde te...@elde.net wrote:
On 17. aug. 2013, at 16:37, Frank Leonhardt freebsd-...@fjl.co.uk wrote:
This is just the sort of problem Google will have when it buys Facebook
:-)
Probably not. If Google were to buy Facebook, I'm confident they'd be able
Let's say we're using MPD on FreeBSD at both ends of a link here, using
a VPN to connect two LANs. (The use of MPD is negotiable).
One LAN uses the address range 192.168.1.0/24 and the other uses the
address range, er, 192.168.1.0/24. However hard you try to avoid this,
it's going to happen
On 16. aug. 2013, at 19:17, Frank Leonhardt freebsd-...@fjl.co.uk wrote:
Has anyone actually done this, and if so, how?
This is wrong on so many levels, and you'll have to work around all og them.
Yes, you can use nat, but what about adress-resolution? And so on.
If it's a specific thing you
On 16 August 2013 20:17, Frank Leonhardt freebsd-...@fjl.co.uk wrote:
Let's say we're using MPD on FreeBSD at both ends of a link here, using a
VPN to connect two LANs. (The use of MPD is negotiable).
One LAN uses the address range 192.168.1.0/24 and the other uses the
address range, er
2013. március 5. 23:44 napon Любомир Григоров nm.kn...@gmail.com írta:
I have been trying to find a way to connect to a PPTP or L2TP VPN for over
a year now. There is no GUI client that I know of and any text
configuration I try with pptpclient fails.
How can I connect to a VPN, the fast
I have been trying to find a way to connect to a PPTP or L2TP VPN for over
a year now. There is no GUI client that I know of and any text
configuration I try with pptpclient fails.
How can I connect to a VPN, the fast way as in Windows, OS X and GNU/Linux.
I have the following information
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:48:45 +0200
Beni Brinckman beni.brinck...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm running FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE (pc-bsd 9.0 actuallly) on amd64 and
I'm using a vpn connexion.
My problem is the enormous speed loss i'm having when I'm using the
vpn connexion.
I have tried Openvpn
Hi,
I'm running FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE (pc-bsd 9.0 actuallly) on amd64 and
I'm using a vpn connexion.
My problem is the enormous speed loss i'm having when I'm using the
vpn connexion.
I have tried Openvpn and mpd5 (with a pptp and l2pt connexion) and the
max speed (according to various speedtests
vpn connexion.
I have tried Openvpn and mpd5 (with a pptp and l2pt connexion) and the
max speed (according to various speedtests) is 5 to 6MB.
5-6MB = megabytes per second? megabytes per hour? per year?
be more precise.
Without the vpn I'm having 45-50 MB... My vpn service has servers
Hello list, I am having a horrible time trying to connect to a PPTP VPN
with MSCHAP and MSCHAPv2 and MPPE. I have tried pptpclient and mpd5 and
both fail on many counts.
I assume there is no gui client at this time, but can I get some sample
config file for ANY vpn client on FreeBSD... I need
Hi;
I've been having this problem establishing a VPN behind a FreeBSD 8-STABLE
with pf.
I have this scenario:
home LAN FBSD+pf home INTERNET --- FBSD+pf work --- work LAN
MPD VPN server
nat rules on FBSD+pf home:
nat on $ext_if from
Hi;
I've been having this problem closing a VPN behind a FreeBSD 8-STABLE with pf.
I have this scenario:
home LAN FBSD+pf home INTERNET --- FBSD+pf work --- work LAN
MPD VPN server
nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any - ($ext_if
On Friday 09 September 2011 18:11:47 Torsten Kersandt wrote:
HI Mario
I don't know what the experts are suggesting but I use a table for the VPN
addresses
To allow nat but block them frm using the server as gateway (use as
default gateway disabled in windows)
I add the rules dynamically
rules DO apply, and on my tests I can see for sure
that when I take NAT out of the picture, the VPN tunnel is established.
The is there the if up and if down functions of MPD come into place unless
you use IP Address/network specific rules.
One server I have in the if-up script:
/etc
Torsten
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Mario Lobo
Sent: 09 September 2011 22:53
To: freebsd...@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: VPN problem
On Friday 09 September 2011 18:11:47 Torsten Kersandt
Здравствуйте, Marco.
Вы писали 5 сентября 2011 г., 2:09:30:
MB On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, the wise Коньков Евгений wrote:
As I have so, you
1. Successfully connect to university
MB ng0: flags=88d1UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0
MB mtu 1456
MB inet 130.115.77.12 --
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, the wise Коньков Евгений wrote:
may be you have a problem with firewall.
try
#traceroute IP or name
Traceroute gives:
...
traceroute vpn-eur-pptp.eur.nl
traceroute: Warning: vpn-eur-pptp.eur.nl has multiple addresses; using
130.115.3.35
traceroute to vpn-eur-pptp.eur.nl
192.168.1.1, the router is the gateway to the internet. IP adresses are
MB assigned by DHCP. The vpn network of the university I would like to
MB connect to has the adress vpn-eur-pptp.eur.nl. The IP range of the
MB university is 130.115.x.x.
MB My ifconfig and netstat when mpd5 is not running:
MB
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, the wise Коньков Евгений wrote:
As I have so, you
1. Successfully connect to university
MB ng0: flags=88d1UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0
MB mtu 1456
MB inet 130.115.77.12 -- 130.115.3.34 netmask 0x
MB inet6
Здравствуйте, Marco.
Вы писали 2 сентября 2011 г., 13:42:23:
MB On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, the wise Коньков Евгений wrote:
set iface route 130.115.0.0/16
you say that behind tunnele thereis 130.115.0.0/16 subnet, but
MB [B1] 130.115.85.11 - 130.115.3.35
you have address from subnet
are
assigned by DHCP. The vpn network of the university I would like to
connect to has the adress vpn-eur-pptp.eur.nl. The IP range of the
university is 130.115.x.x.
My ifconfig and netstat when mpd5 is not running:
em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
options
iface route default
MB With help from Mike Tancsa I've changed the config a bit and getting less
MB errors now, but still not a working vpn connection. My mpd.conf is now:
MB ...
MB # Default configuration is pptp_client
MB default:
MB load pptp_client
MB pptp_client:
MB #
MB # PPTP
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, the wise Коньков Евгений wrote:
set iface route 130.115.0.0/16
you say that behind tunnele thereis 130.115.0.0/16 subnet, but
MB [B1] 130.115.85.11 - 130.115.3.35
you have address from subnet 130.115.0.0/16 addres on local machine
so you get this message:
MB Loop detected
windowing
open
MB I used the mpd.conf above but mpd5 doesn't work either. It looks like it
MB makes a connection but I don't have a vpn connection and it didn't log in.
MB I do get a lot of output though:
MB ...
MB process 9290 started, version 5.5 (r...@yokozuna.lan 17:08 30-Jul-2011)
MB
the config a bit and getting less
errors now, but still not a working vpn connection. My mpd.conf is now:
...
# Default configuration is pptp_client
default:
load pptp_client
pptp_client:
#
# PPTP client: only outgoing calls, auto reconnect,
# ipcp-negotiated address, one-sided authentication
On 30 August 2011 22:51, Marco Beishuizen mb...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to set up a vpn connection to the university library by using
pptpclient. In other OS's this takes around 10 seconds, but in FreeBSD this
seems very difficult to do, and I've no idea why. It looks like
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, the wise krad wrote:
have you tried mpd? I always found pptpclient a bit prone to issues
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/pppoa.html
Yes I did some time ago, but I found it so complicated that I never got it
working. Pptpclient seems a lot simpler so I wanted to try
like it
makes a connection but I don't have a vpn connection and it didn't log in.
I do get a lot of output though:
...
process 9290 started, version 5.5 (r...@yokozuna.lan 17:08 30-Jul-2011)
CONSOLE: listening on 127.0.0.1 5005
web: listening on 0.0.0.0 5006
[B1] Bundle: Interface ng0 created
Hi,
I'm trying to set up a vpn connection to the university library by using
pptpclient. In other OS's this takes around 10 seconds, but in FreeBSD
this seems very difficult to do, and I've no idea why. It looks like
there is a connection made, but after a minute or two it just disconnects
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Geoff Roberts ge...@apro.com.au wrote:
Was this easy to measure, and how did you measure this - dropped packets on
the bridge interface?
I don't remember. It's been too long since I last tried it. Dropped
packets would be a good measure, though, assuming the
On 5/5/2011 12:24 AM, David Brodbeck wrote:
The problem I've always found with bridged solutions is they don't
cope well under heavy traffic loads when the VPN link is slower than
the LANs they're bridging between. And the VPN link is usually slower
if it's over a WAN. The link tends to get
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis nv...@gmx.com wrote:
There is no inbuilt reason why a L2 VPN is more easily saturated
than a L3 VPN.
I disagree slightly. With L2 you have broadcasts and non-routable
protocols being sent over the wire. This is fortunately becoming less
On 3 May 2011 20:44, Kevin Wilcox kevin.wil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 15:19, Geoff Roberts ge...@apro.com.au wrote:
Is it possible to join two sites with the same subnet across a VPN?
Yes.
I have two sites that have the same subnet/mask.
I need these two separated
with bridged solutions is they don't
cope well under heavy traffic loads when the VPN link is slower than
the LANs they're bridging between. And the VPN link is usually slower
if it's over a WAN. The link tends to get saturated.
___
freebsd-questions
Hi David and others,
Thanks for the feedback.
On Thu, 5 May 2011 07:24:13 am David Brodbeck wrote:
The problem I've always found with bridged solutions is they don't
cope well under heavy traffic loads when the VPN link is slower than
the LANs they're bridging between. And the VPN link
Hi,
Is it possible to join two sites with the same subnet across a VPN?
I have two sites that have the same subnet/mask.
I need these two separated networks to behave as one across a VPN.
All configuration examples I've come across so far assume that each site will
have a different subnet. Eg
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 15:19, Geoff Roberts ge...@apro.com.au wrote:
Is it possible to join two sites with the same subnet across a VPN?
Yes.
I have two sites that have the same subnet/mask.
I need these two separated networks to behave as one across a VPN.
That's understandable. You may
Hi guys- been a while: caught up in some bad weather recently... (if
anyone's been following AU news)
I've been attacking this problem for a while now, but I haven't been
able to make some real gains on it. I'm trying use a vpn on the android
2.1 system, but I haven't been able to find out
Hello guys,
I have 3x 8.1-RELEASE i386 machines with a custom kernel that consists of
the GENERIC kernel plus:
options IPSEC
options IPSEC_DEBUG
device crypto
the 3 extra options needed for IPSEC/racoon VPN. All the setup was made
according to [URL=http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ipsec.html
% route add 192.168.10.24/32 200.x.x.x
% route add 192.168.201.196/32 200.x.x.x
% route add 10.115.90.236/32 200.x.x.x
add net 192.168.10.24: gateway 200.x.x.x: Network is unreachable
--
The kernel will not create routes automatically?
--
Matheus Weber da
On 2010.07.07 18:28, Matheus Weber da Conceição wrote:
Hello guys;
I'm using a FreeBSD 7.0 in my firewall/gateway, and I have to connect
via VPN to a Cisco box.
The scene here is:
* Peer A (Cisco): 200.xxx.xxx.xxx
IPs that Peer B need to access:
- 192.168.10.24
It has been a long time since I've done IPSec on FBSD, but I'm willing
to bet that this has to do with routing, possibly amongst other things.
On peer 'B' (FBSD box), what internal IP range are you trying to access
the A network from...the same ones (ie. are you trying to bridge the
On 2010.07.08 10:00, Matheus Weber da Conceição wrote:
It has been a long time since I've done IPSec on FBSD, but I'm willing
to bet that this has to do with routing, possibly amongst other things.
On peer 'B' (FBSD box), what internal IP range are you trying to access
the A network from...the
On 2010.07.08 10:51, Steve Bertrand wrote:
On 2010.07.08 10:00, Matheus Weber da Conceição wrote:
It has been a long time since I've done IPSec on FBSD, but I'm willing
to bet that this has to do with routing, possibly amongst other things.
On peer 'B' (FBSD box), what internal IP range are
On 2010.07.08 10:54, Steve Bertrand wrote:
On 2010.07.08 10:51, Steve Bertrand wrote:
On 2010.07.08 10:00, Matheus Weber da Conceição wrote:
It has been a long time since I've done IPSec on FBSD, but I'm willing
to bet that this has to do with routing, possibly amongst other things.
On peer
% route add 192.168.10.24/32 200.x.x.x
% route add 192.168.201.196/32 200.x.x.x
% route add 10.115.90.236/32 200.x.x.x
add net 192.168.10.24: gateway 200.x.x.x: Network is unreachable
--
Matheus Weber da Conceição
___
Hello guys;
I'm using a FreeBSD 7.0 in my firewall/gateway, and I have to connect
via VPN to a Cisco box.
The scene here is:
* Peer A (Cisco): 200.xxx.xxx.xxx
IPs that Peer B need to access:
- 192.168.10.24
- 192.168.201.196
- 10.115.90.236
* Peer B (FreeBSD 7.0): 187
Hi;
I have the following situation:
FBSD 8-STABLE firewall/vpn server (poptop)to a windows network, authenticating
to an AD 2008 as radius.
Everything seems working ok. I connect to the LAN through an XP machine. Auth
works fine, the tunnel is up, and I can ping and see every server
A friend has asked me to help him configure pptp such that
when a client connects several additional static routes
are added on the client side WITHOUT requiring special
scripts on the client side.
Is this possible?
Example:
client connects, default route is unchanged
2
I have a small dilemma. The boss finally relented and is allowing me to work
from home. This is a good deal for him too I just have to convince him. They
have a Cisco ASA 5505 VPN router at the office. I have a wonderfully working
LAN that uses a FreeBSD-7.2-STABLE server running NATD+IPFW
Hi--
On Feb 17, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Bill Tillman wrote:
The tech told me that I need to forward ports 500 and 4500 with my FreeBSD
router to the small VPN router inside my LAN. That's simple enought but then
he tells me I need to redirect all EPS and all AH traffic as well. I guess
-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wed Feb 17 17:17:58 2010
Subject: Re: FreeBSD to Cisco ASA 5505 VPN Connection
Hi--
On Feb 17, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Bill Tillman wrote:
The tech told me that I need to forward ports 500 and 4500 with my FreeBSD
router to the small VPN router inside my LAN. That's simple
--- On Wed, 2/17/10, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
From: Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com
Subject: Re: FreeBSD to Cisco ASA 5505 VPN Connection
To: Bill Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2010, 5:17 PM
Hi--
On Feb 17, 2010, at 3:06
A good idea would be to use pfsense
It is an excellent firewall based on FreeBSD, freely available here
http://www.pfsense.org/
Then you can choose whatever you want as a VPN solution… You would have an
optimized kernel (for firewalling) a simple interface to do all related
install
i m triying to do a host to host VPN and i have the next error , i check
that port 500 is free.
2010-02-12 10:22:58: DEBUG: open /var/racoon/racoon.sock as racoon
management.
2010-02-12 10:22:58: DEBUG: my interface: fe80::230:48ff:fed4:768f%eth0
(eth0)
2010-02-12 10:22:58: DEBUG: my interface
forgotten most of what I once knew about PPP configuration
when we were setting up regional ISPs with lots of dialup
connections (and we used Bay/Nortel Annex servers which handled
most of this with their own configurations).
We use OpenVPN for most of our VPN connections which I find much
easier
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010, D?nielisz L?szl? wrote:
hi,
i also choose poptop and pptp but i'm still getting errors while
connecting, would you be so kind to send me some configuration files?
The attached configuration files, options.pptpd and pptpd.conf
are
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/for-vpn-connection-tp27509800p27520457.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
I use freebsd7.2
I have an iphone. I wish to establish a vpn connection between the iphone
and my freebsd server as client to server.
What sort of softwares shall I use for it ?
Could you give me an example?
any advances?
Thanks
___
freebsd
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010, Yavuz Ma?lak wrote:
I use freebsd7.2
I have an iphone. I wish to establish a vpn connection between the iphone
and my freebsd server as client to server.
What sort of softwares shall I use for it ?
I just went through this for Linux/iPhone last week.
The easiest
wish to establish a vpn connection between the iphone
and my freebsd server as client to server.
What sort of softwares shall I use for it ?
I just went through this for Linux/iPhone last week.
The easiest for the iPhone is probably PPTP. One *nix side of
this is poptop. I don't know what's
hi,
i'm going with pptp but still can't manage it to work, in case i'll then i'll
let you know :-)
On 2010.02.08., at 21:36, Yavuz Maşlak yavuz.mas...@netiletisim.net wrote:
I use freebsd7.2
I have an iphone. I wish to establish a vpn connection between the iphone and
my freebsd server
Hi,
I'm looking forward how to connect from my iphone to my FreeBSD server using
VPN, do you have any suggestions?
Should I use, L2TP, PPTP or IPSec? Do you have any experience with it?
Some details: my iphone always gets a new ip address from my GSM provider when
I connect to the internet
hi all...
wondering if somebody has done vpn between a bsd box and a portable
device running windows mobile. is it possible?
looking at the wireless networking off the handbook gives a direct
example with 2 bsd machines.
the bsd machine and the wireless device are hooked up now adhoc
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 07:35:08PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:26:45AM -0700, Joseph Olatt wrote:
It appears that racoon2 has been removed from the ports.
Superseded by: ipsec-tools
Look closely. security/racoon was removed, not security/racoon2!
Thanks for the
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:44:28PM +0200, get acoder wrote:
Hi there,
I am refering to your very detailed doc
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ipsec.html
I am exactly looking for the same features and setup, my only issue is that
I cant find racoon as you are
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:26:45AM -0700, Joseph Olatt wrote:
It appears that racoon2 has been removed from the ports.
Superseded by: ipsec-tools
Look closely. security/racoon was removed, not security/racoon2!
[/usr/ports]
x...@serenity$ make search name=racoon
Port: racoon2-20071227e_1
Hi there,
I am refering to your very detailed doc
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ipsec.html
I am exactly looking for the same features and setup, my only issue is that
I cant find racoon as you are describing here:
/usr/local/etc/racoon/racoon.conf
I installed ipsec
Hello freebsd-questions,
Have one ISP and two lines from him. Connection to Internet are made
via= VPN. Could load-balancing be realized with help of mpd5 or some
other util= ity, which provides VPN connections?
--
--
Best regards,
Anton
Anton wrote:
Hello freebsd-questions,
Have one ISP and two lines from him. Connection to Internet are made
via=PN. Could load-balancing be realized with help of mpd5 or some
other util=ty, which provides VPN connections?
With mpd you can combine several ppp links in to one
Hello Nikos,
Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 11:16:08 AM, you wrote:
Anton wrote:
Hello freebsd-questions,
Have one ISP and two lines from him. Connection to Internet are made
via=PN. Could load-balancing be realized with help of mpd5 or some
other util=ty, which provides VPN
Hello Nikos,
Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 11:16:08 AM, you wrote:
Anton wrote:
Hello freebsd-questions,
Have one ISP and two lines from him. Connection to Internet are made
via=PN. Could load-balancing be realized with help of mpd5 or some
other util=ty, which provides VPN
Anton wrote:
Asked tech's of ISP - they said that they do not dupport multilink ppp
You can achieve almost the same effect with the aid of
a firewall. There many posts/tutorials/examples on the
net, regarding load sharing and (pf|ipf|ipfw). Try to
adapt one to your setup and post your
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Mike Sweetser - Adhost
mik...@adhost.comwrote:
Hello,
We have a network with a VPN device sitting beside a PF server, both
connected to an internal network.
PF Server: 10.1.4.1
VPN Device: 10.1.4.200
The VPNs are set up for 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.1.2.0/24
-Original Message-
From: Valentin Bud [mailto:valentin@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 1:36 AM
To: Mike Sweetser - Adhost
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: PF Routing to VPN Device
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Mike Sweetser - Adhost
mik
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Valentin Bud valentin@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Mike Sweetser - Adhost
mik...@adhost.com wrote:
Hello,
We have a network with a VPN device sitting beside a PF server, both
connected to an internal network.
PF Server
On 6/17/09, Mike Sweetser - Adhost mik...@adhost.com wrote:
Hello,
We have a network with a VPN device sitting beside a PF server, both
connected to an internal network.
PF Server: 10.1.4.1
VPN Device: 10.1.4.200
The VPNs are set up for 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.1.2.0/24, so any traffic
Hello,
We have a network with a VPN device sitting beside a PF server, both
connected to an internal network.
PF Server: 10.1.4.1
VPN Device: 10.1.4.200
The VPNs are set up for 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.1.2.0/24, so any traffic to
these networks should be routed to 10.1.4.200. We've set up routes
Hi:
I have the following setup:
XP -- FBSD -- Ineternet --- Work
I need to setup a VPN connection from my work station to work but the
connection failes, presumably blocked by my firewall. The FBSD gateway
use ip filter to filter traffic with a default block. Listening on the
pflog
with an IPSEC VPN client that I run to
connect
to the appropriate server. As I looked through my normal traveling gear
my laptop (Windows XP Pro) and handheld (iPaq 211) both seem to have IPSEC
clients built in.
Can someone point me to a VPN for dummies documentation so I can set up my
firewall
I have a personal network behind a FreeBSD firewall running IPFW. It's been
working fine for years, but as I'm getting more mobile in my work I'd like
to be able to access my network while traveling.
At work the problem is solved with an IPSEC VPN client that I run to connect
to the appropriate
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009, Joe Kraft wrote:
I have a personal network behind a FreeBSD firewall running IPFW. It's been
working fine for years, but as I'm getting more mobile in my work I'd like
to be able to access my network while traveling.
At work the problem is solved with an IPSEC VPN client
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 17:02:05 nrml nrml wrote:
Hello,
I followed the handbook instructions and the ipsec(4) man page to setup
vpn-over-ipsec for our company's site-to-site connection via our
dedicated T1. Anyway I have it working but I found that I need to make
sure that multicast
Hello,
I followed the handbook instructions and the ipsec(4) man page to setup
vpn-over-ipsec for our company's site-to-site connection via our dedicated T1.
Anyway I have it working but I found that I need to make sure that multicast
traffic can traverse through the two subnets. I have
d c wrote:
I have used /usr/ports/net/pptpclient/ as long as I remember. I just setup a
new 7.0 Desktop and installed the port. When I run pptp x.x.x.x I get:
/bin/ip: not found
/bin/ip: not found
Loading /lib/libalias_cuseeme.so
Loading /lib/libalias_ftp.so
Loading /lib/libalias_irc.so
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
d c [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone ran across this? Is there an alternate instead of ip? Perhaps I
can hack it into the source.
yup, i found it too when I recently reinstalled it to get back onto a PPTP vpn.
FWIW, it works just fine regardless
I have used /usr/ports/net/pptpclient/ as long as I remember. I just setup a
new 7.0 Desktop and installed the port. When I run pptp x.x.x.x I get:
/bin/ip: not found
/bin/ip: not found
Loading /lib/libalias_cuseeme.so
Loading /lib/libalias_ftp.so
Loading /lib/libalias_irc.so
Loading
Hi,
I use PF to manage the traffic going through a VPN connection (ng0 to
ng1). I am also able to manage the traffic on the device where I
expect the VPN traffic (ed1 and ed2).
But now my problems starts I also want to manage the outgoing traffic
on ed0 to the WAN side.
On my router s
--- On Sun, 6/8/08, Gonzalo Nemmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please _do_ send them to this list or throw a pointer at
where they are at !
I'm sure more people than you can think of will find
them usefull.
I, for once, could really use them :)
Hi Gonzalo, all
I knew I should have done that
I've recently implemented OpenVPN under FreeBSD
For our team, it's been rock solid
I found the OpenVPN docs were excellent for Windohs/Linux but were lacking a
little for BSD
while i don't know openvpn i use mpd (for windows interoperability) and
vtun (for unix only) both works excellent.
1 - 100 of 559 matches
Mail list logo
