On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:27:33 -0700 (MST)
Brett Glass wrote:
>
> Just installed mpd5 to experiment with it, and got the following
> error message on the next boot:
>
> WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize()
>
> What does this mean? Does it signal a serious problem?
It
Just installed mpd5 to experiment with it, and got the following error message
on the next boot:
WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize()
What does this mean? Does it signal a serious problem?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-question
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 03:48:44 +1100
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems my side is receiving a packet with DOI type 0 (as per wireshark,
> whatever that means...)... and racoon complains with;
>
> Jan 2 03:28:18 ayiin racoon: ERROR: reject the packet, received unexpecting
> payl
Hi all,
I'm trying to connect to a Sonicwall TZ170 (I believe), from my FBSD
6.2-Prerelease. I have a username, password and PSK (ie, Xauth PSK) from the
SonicW's admin (who refuses to provide any help for non MS OS :-) ).
I've installed ipsec-tools-0.6.6 because I believe (wrongly?) that ipsec
Corey Brune wrote:
It may be hardware related. Have you made any system changes lately?
How often does this occur?
No changes since about last April. I did move from FBSD 5.x to FBSD 6.x
(RELENG_6_0) at the time that 6.0 was released. Nothing since.
I have seen the issue a couple of tim
It may be hardware related. Have you made any system changes lately?
How often does this occur?
On 1/13/06, Thomas T. Veldhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am seeing the following in my security logs. Can anybody tell me what
> this means? Perhaps I should consider a new NIC?
>
> +dc0: watchd
I am seeing the following in my security logs. Can anybody tell me what
this means? Perhaps I should consider a new NIC?
+dc0: watchdog timeout
+dc0: link state changed to DOWN
+dc0: link state changed to UP
Thanks in advance,
Tom Veldhouse
___
f
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 09:31:33AM -0500, Dan Pelleg wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:30:30AM +0200, Petre Bandac wrote:
> > > Nov 17 02:27:59 kgb /kernel: OUCH! cannot remove rule, count 1
> > >
> > > why ouch and what rule ?
> >
> > I think th
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:30:30AM +0200, Petre Bandac wrote:
> > Nov 17 02:27:59 kgb /kernel: OUCH! cannot remove rule, count 1
> >
> > why ouch and what rule ?
>
> I think that's an ipfw message..it's probably an ipfw bug of some
> kind.
It is. But
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:30:30AM +0200, Petre Bandac wrote:
> Nov 17 02:27:59 kgb /kernel: OUCH! cannot remove rule, count 1
>
> why ouch and what rule ?
I think that's an ipfw message..it's probably an ipfw bug of some
kind.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Nov 17 02:27:59 kgb /kernel: OUCH! cannot remove rule, count 1
why ouch and what rule ?
TIA,
petre
--
Login: petreName: Petre Bandac
Directory: /home/petre Shell: /usr/local/bin/zsh
On since Sun Nov 16 09:43 (EET) on ttyv0, idle 16:45 (messages off)
11 matches
Mail list logo