IMAP-UW problems

2004-07-07 Thread Jorn Argelo
Hi guys, I've compiled IMAP-UW from the ports-tree with the following option: WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT I can telnet to port 993, internal and external, and the imapd is being invoked by inetd. However, I still can't login. My machine throws out this kernel message: Jul 7 10:48:34 www

4.10 Installation/configuration

2004-07-07 Thread AlbrtNew
Hi I am in the process of installing 4.10 FreeBSD and have got as far as the ' basic ' insatllation and am now starting post-installation configuration. I find, however, that I appear to have the wrong default keyboard configuration for my Region [UK] and I was wondering if anybody can put me

Re: 4.10 Installation/configuration

2004-07-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 06:36:51AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am in the process of installing 4.10 FreeBSD and have got as far as the ' basic ' insatllation and am now starting post-installation configuration. I find, however, that I appear to have the wrong default keyboard

BandwidthD syntax error?

2004-07-07 Thread Eric Crist
Hey all, I just installed bandwidthd, and I get the following error when I try to run it from it's home directory: Monitoring subnet 63.228.14.240 with netmask 255.255.255.248 grog# Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on

Re: tcpdump (/dev/bpf* permission) in FreeBSD-current

2004-07-07 Thread Patrick Dung
Only /dev/bpf0 is there at boot time But when I run tcpdump, it automatically create /dev/bpf1 (I have multiple NIC). Running devfs at boot time cannot set the /dev/bpf1, which is not present. --- Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Patrick Dung [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is no way to

Re: BandwidthD syntax error?

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
Eric Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, I just installed bandwidthd, and I get the following error when I try to run it from it's home directory: Monitoring subnet 63.228.14.240 with netmask 255.255.255.248 grog# Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Syntax Error parse

Strange error while installing apache 2.0.50 on freebsd 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9

2004-07-07 Thread Alexander Liebau
hi, i got a strange problem with apache 2.0.50 on freebsd 5.2.1.. while installing it says: mkdir /usr/local/libexec/apache2 /usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode= install cp mod_access.la /usr/local/libexec/apache2/ grep:

RE: BandwidthD syntax error?

2004-07-07 Thread Michael Clark
If you want to post your configuration file Ill take a look at it. Michael Clark Nemschoff Chairs Inc mclark at nemschoff dot com CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 Fax: (920) 453 6594 -Original Message- From: Eric Crist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart

2004-07-07 Thread Steve Bertrand
After a year I'm finally upgrading DNS servers, and having a bad time getting sendmail and dhcp to work. I may finally have dhcp woking on ns1.thought.org. ping works and my /var/log/maillog is filling up. But on tao.thought.org, sendmail refuses to start. Can anybody help me ith this?

Re: tcpdump (/dev/bpf* permission) in FreeBSD-current

2004-07-07 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 07), Patrick Dung said: Only /dev/bpf0 is there at boot time But when I run tcpdump, it automatically create /dev/bpf1 (I have multiple NIC). Running devfs at boot time cannot set the /dev/bpf1, which is not present. Devfs rules use wildcard matches: path pattern

Re: tcpdump (/dev/bpf* permission) in FreeBSD-current

2004-07-07 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Patrick Dung [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Only /dev/bpf0 is there at boot time But when I run tcpdump, it automatically create /dev/bpf1 (I have multiple NIC). Running devfs at boot time cannot set the /dev/bpf1, which is not present. Running devfs(8) at boot time will set rules that will be

bypass no new partitions protection ?

2004-07-07 Thread Hugo Silva
Hi all In one of my servers I left a 80GB disk unpartitioned to later partitition it according to my needs, only to have sysinstall always complain it couldn't write to ad1. I've googled a bit and it seems its related to some kind of protection that won't allow the system to create any new

Re: Devices not being built

2004-07-07 Thread Nathan Kinkade
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:44:02AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I've built a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #5 kernel. I have a linksys WMP 11 wireless card. I've configured and built the kernel with the followings devices device wlan# 802.11 support device an

RE: BandwidthD syntax error?

2004-07-07 Thread Eric Crist
Here you go! =START CONFIG= subnet 63.228.14.240 255.255.255.248 dev dc0 #skip_intervals 0 #graph_cutoff 1024 #promiscuous true #output_cdf false #recover_cdf false #filter ip #graph true =STOP CONFIG= Thanks for your help. Please note, this is a short config file, but I now

RE: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart

2004-07-07 Thread Eric Crist
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Bertrand Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 8:32 AM To: Gary Kline Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart After a year I'm finally upgrading DNS servers,

Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Chris
Folks, I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would block this? If the above needs recompiling sendmail, then I would certainly prefer the latter. -- Best regards, Chris

Re: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart

2004-07-07 Thread Gary Kline
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 09:32:12AM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote: After a year I'm finally upgrading DNS servers, and having a bad time getting sendmail and dhcp to work. I may finally have dhcp woking on ns1.thought.org. ping works and my /var/log/maillog is filling up. But on

Re: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart

2004-07-07 Thread Gary Kline
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:07:11AM -0500, Eric Crist wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Bertrand Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 8:32 AM To: Gary Kline Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Sendmail hand upon boot

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Thomas Wolf
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Folks, I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would block this? If the above needs recompiling sendmail, then I would certainly prefer the latter.

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would block this? 1. cd /etc/mail/ 2. Edit `hostname`.mc (if it doesn't exist, cd /etc/mail; make) 3. Add this next to one of the other

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
AFAIK, it is sufficient to edit /etc/mail/sendmail.cf and comment or delete the follwoing line: O DaemonPortOptions=Port=587, Name=MSA, M=E and restart sendmail afterwards. Hand editing the sendmail.cf is a bad idea. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing

portsclean -DD

2004-07-07 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
The man page for portsclean is a little vague on the exact semantics of using portsclean -DD. I understand that -D specified once cleans out any distfiles for ports which are not currently installed, but specified twice, does it *only* clean out distfiles that are unreferenced by any port in the

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Chico
Gregory, Great reply... I like how you gave the exact instructions. Shawn --- Gregory Neil Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would block

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Chris
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 12:24 pm, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: AFAIK, it is sufficient to edit /etc/mail/sendmail.cf and comment or delete the follwoing line: O DaemonPortOptions=Port=587, Name=MSA, M=E and restart sendmail afterwards. Hand editing the sendmail.cf is a bad idea. I

Re: Can't install kdebase

2004-07-07 Thread Manuel Astudillo
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 11.13, Jason Oakley wrote: Resend as my previous emails didn't seem to arrive. I can't get kdebase to install. This is a new FreeBSD build from Mini ISO. kde has not been installed on here before. I first installed evolution. Now KDE. I've tried building from

APM and DRI lockups when suspending

2004-07-07 Thread Duane Winner
Does anybody know if there is a workaround for the problem with DRI and APM within X? If I load the DRI module in my XF86Config file, and attempt to suspend my laptop, the system freezes on resume, then reboots. If I comment out the line Load dri out of the Module section in

Re: pf on 4.10

2004-07-07 Thread hamlet
that's coming in 5.3-RELEASE ~hamlet On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, JJB wrote: Is there an port of pf firewall that installs on 4.10? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any

Mon? (or a substitute monitoring daemon)

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
I'm replacing some Debian servers with FreeBSD machines ... I'm having a little trouble with mon ... the service monitoring daemon for Linux. It doesn't appear as if there's a FreeBSD port. Is there a FreeBSD port of mon, and I'm just searching the ports wrong? I'd like to continue to use mon

Re: Mon? (or a substitute monitoring daemon)

2004-07-07 Thread Dan Finn
Nagios. I have used it at my current and previous employer and it works very well. Many more features than mon IMO. On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:06:01 -0400, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm replacing some Debian servers with FreeBSD machines ... I'm having a little trouble with mon ...

APM and DRI lockups when suspending

2004-07-07 Thread Sean Welch
Duane, there have always been issues with this aspect of APM. I have found it sufficient to run two X servers to handle the issue. Most of my software runs in an X session without DRI enabled and then when I want to run accelerated 3D I just start up another X session with DRI enabled. For

RE: pf on 4.10

2004-07-07 Thread JJB
Please clarify; It's my understanding that in 5.3 pf will be delivered as the 3rd built in firewall solution. It will have it's own boot time loadable module just like ipfilter. No kernel recompile needed to enable it. Is this correct? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: portsclean -DD

2004-07-07 Thread Randy Pratt
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:25:39 -0500 (CDT) Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The man page for portsclean is a little vague on the exact semantics of using portsclean -DD. I understand that -D specified once cleans out any distfiles for ports which are not currently installed, but

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Dick Davies
* Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] [0701 18:01]: Folks, I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would block this? If the above needs recompiling sendmail, then I would certainly

Re: Mon? (or a substitute monitoring daemon)

2004-07-07 Thread Nico Meijer
Hey Bill, If not, what do folks recommend for service monitoring? monit[1] and monitord[2]. I mainly use FreeBSD and OpenBSD boxes right now, and I couldn't get monitord to run on OpenBSD, so I've switched to monit. There's a security warning roaming about on monit and http, so don't get

Re: portsclean -DD

2004-07-07 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On 07-Jul-2004 Randy Pratt wrote: On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:25:39 -0500 (CDT) Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I understand that -D specified once cleans out any distfiles for ports which are not currently installed, but specified twice, does it *only* clean out distfiles that are

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] [0701 18:01]: Folks, I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would block this? If the above needs

RE: pf on 4.10

2004-07-07 Thread hamlet
as far as i remember, that's correct. this is moderately fuzzy memory from the 'state of freebsd' presentation at usenix, but appears to match my rather sketchy notes. ~hamlet On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, JJB wrote: Please clarify; It's my understanding that in 5.3 pf will be delivered as the 3rd

maillog

2004-07-07 Thread Gary Kline
Here is part of /var/log/maillog. Does this suggest anything?? Jul 7 12:53:13 sage sm-mta[291]: i67Jqns6000291: --- 221 2.0.0 ns1.thought.org closing connection Jul 7 12:53:13 sage sm-mta[295]: i67Jqns5000291: --- 050 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Connecting to tao.thought.org. via

Re: maillog

2004-07-07 Thread Chris
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 03:07 pm, Gary Kline wrote: Here is part of /var/log/maillog. Does this suggest anything?? Jul 7 12:53:13 sage sm-mta[291]: i67Jqns6000291: --- 221 2.0.0 ns1.thought.org closing connection Jul 7 12:53:13 sage sm-mta[295]: i67Jqns5000291: --- 050 [EMAIL

FreeBSD via BitTorrent

2004-07-07 Thread adstro
Does anyone know if there is an official release available for current (5.2.1) via BitTorrent. Thanks ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A few simple questions(...if you don't mind)

2004-07-07 Thread Andy Holyer
On 6 Jul 2004, at 11:36, Erik Trulsson wrote: If you go back a bit further in time there was the Great Worm of 1988, which targeted VAX and Sun3 systems running BSD code, and which actually did bring down most of the Internet at the time. That was the incident that got people in the Unix

OpenSSL with threads enabled, problem getting it to install

2004-07-07 Thread Gene Gilbert
Hello, Firstly I am fairly new to FreeBSD and I have been stuck on this for a couple of weeks now. I am installing a web server, Resin, that in order to run ssl connections needs to have openssl compiled with threads enabled. I am running FreeBSD 4.10 Stable, it is brand new computer with a

postmap main.cf

2004-07-07 Thread Joshua Lewis
I am trying to set up Postfix on 4.10 and when trying to run: postmap main.cf I get a postmap not found error. Can anyone tell me where this program is located or a way to search my system for the program. Thank you, Joshua Lewis ___ [EMAIL

Re: postmap main.cf

2004-07-07 Thread Chuck Swiger
Joshua Lewis wrote: I am trying to set up Postfix on 4.10 and when trying to run: postmap main.cf I get a postmap not found error. Can anyone tell me where this program is located or a way to search my system for the program. locate postmap, which postmap, or find / -name postmap are possible ways

Re: postmap main.cf

2004-07-07 Thread uidzero
Joshua Lewis wrote: I am trying to set up Postfix on 4.10 and when trying to run: postmap main.cf I get a postmap not found error. Can anyone tell me where this program is located or a way to search my system for the program. Thank you, Joshua Lewis ___

Re: postmap main.cf

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to set up Postfix on 4.10 and when trying to run: postmap main.cf I get a postmap not found error. Can anyone tell me where this program is located or a way to search my system for the program. whereis postmap find / -name postmap

Re: Devices not being built

2004-07-07 Thread Nathan Kinkade
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 08:12:35PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:44:02AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I've built a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #5 kernel. I have a linksys WMP 11 wi reless card. I've configured and built the kernel with the

Re: Mon? (or a substitute monitoring daemon)

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
Dan Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nagios. I have used it at my current and previous employer and it works very well. Many more features than mon IMO. Thanks for the input. I also found Big Sister, which looks pretty nice. Not sure which one I'll use, but this gives me lots to evaluate!

making without threads

2004-07-07 Thread David Bear
I'm trying to use the python 2.3.4 port. I tried to issue make --without-threads but its still is making it with threads. make help doesn't.. the pkg_* files don't seem to be much help. how do I list and change make options? -- David Bear phone: 480-965-8257 fax:480-965-9189 College

Re: making without threads

2004-07-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:11:55PM -0700, David Bear wrote: I'm trying to use the python 2.3.4 port. I tried to issue make --without-threads but its still is making it with threads. make help doesn't.. the pkg_* files don't seem to be much help. how do I list and change make

Re: bypass no new partitions protection ?

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
Hugo Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all In one of my servers I left a 80GB disk unpartitioned to later partitition it according to my needs, only to have sysinstall always complain it couldn't write to ad1. I've googled a bit and it seems its related to some kind of protection that won't

where o where is it starting from

2004-07-07 Thread Mark
Howdy, I replaced the sendmail with postfix. However on boot up I get a error: Starting Standard daemons : inetd cron sshd sendmail-submitsendmail: illegal option --0 sendmail: fatal usage : sendmail [options] Jul 7 18:38:40 spiderman postfix/sendmail[83]: fatal:usage: sendmail [options}

Re: postmap main.cf

2004-07-07 Thread Joshua Lewis
main.cf doesn't get postmaped. only the .map files do. unless its changed since i last upgraded. I have never set up Postfix. In fact I have never set up any e-mail server. I am following a document titled: Creating a Stable Secure FreeBSD MailServer found on http://www.bsdhound.com You

Re: where o where is it starting from

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy, I replaced the sendmail with postfix. However on boot up I get a error: Starting Standard daemons : inetd cron sshd sendmail-submitsendmail: illegal option --0 sendmail: fatal usage : sendmail [options] Jul 7 18:38:40 spiderman postfix/sendmail[83]:

Re: where o where is it starting from

2004-07-07 Thread Mark
Never mind. I found it. /etc/defaults/rc.conf I thought /etc/rc.conf overrode the other. In /etc/rc.conf I put sendmail and inetd to NO but they were still starting up. Mark - Original Message - From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 6:32 PM

cvsup behind windows xp

2004-07-07 Thread Grant Speelman
Hi there I got the small problem, I would like to keep my ports collection update using cvsup but I don't have a direct connection to the internet. My Computer is on a network with my Fathers computer which is running windows xp. Lets say I have full access to my fathers computer as long I

allowing users to mount cdrom again

2004-07-07 Thread Grant Speelman
Hi I read in the previous post about allowing users to mount cdrom and wanted to try it for myself I did the follow : added vfs.usermount=1 to /etc/sysctl.conf changed the permissions on /dev/acd0 to include the user restarted freebsd (It's amazing what a restart does for me sometimes) but

Re: postmap main.cf

2004-07-07 Thread Joshua Lewis
main.cf doesn't get postmaped. only the .map files do. unless its changed since i last upgraded. I have never set up Postfix. In fact I have never set up any e-mail server. I am following a document titled: Creating a Stable Secure FreeBSD MailServer found on http://www.bsdhound.com You

Re: FreeBSD via BitTorrent

2004-07-07 Thread Gautam Gopalakrishnan
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:39:53 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know if there is an official release available for current (5.2.1) via BitTorrent. http://www.opentorrent.org/ Gautam ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Which branch to use as tag for 5.2.1?

2004-07-07 Thread Rickard Borgmäster
Hi, I'm trying out FBSD 5.2.1 at the moment to see if it will work OK with my onboard VIA 8237 SATA Controller, which didn't work that fine in 4.10. I'm about to do a buildworld. But I have a little difficult understanding what tag to set in my cvsupfile? I want something similar to RELENG_4 but

query iir(4) device for disk status

2004-07-07 Thread Edwin Groothuis
Hi, Does anybody know how I can query the status of the disks accessed via the iir(4) device (Intel Integrated RAID)? Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/

Re: where o where is it starting from

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Never mind. I found it. /etc/defaults/rc.conf I thought /etc/rc.conf overrode the other. In /etc/rc.conf I put sendmail and inetd to NO but they were still starting up. Don't modify /etc/defaults/rc.conf /etc/rc.conf _does_ override /etc/defaults/rc.conf You

Re: Which branch to use as tag for 5.2.1?

2004-07-07 Thread Andrew L. Gould
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 08:01 pm, Rickard Borgmäster wrote: Hi, I'm trying out FBSD 5.2.1 at the moment to see if it will work OK with my onboard VIA 8237 SATA Controller, which didn't work that fine in 4.10. I'm about to do a buildworld. But I have a little difficult understanding what

Re: Which branch to use as tag for 5.2.1?

2004-07-07 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 03:01:11AM +0200, Rickard Borgmäster wrote: Hi, I'm trying out FBSD 5.2.1 at the moment to see if it will work OK with my onboard VIA 8237 SATA Controller, which didn't work that fine in 4.10. I'm about to do a buildworld. But I have a little difficult understanding

Re: Which branch to use as tag for 5.2.1?

2004-07-07 Thread Trey Sizemore
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 04:05 +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: What you want is RELENG_5, which doesn't exist yet. It will be created when 5.x is considered to be the new -STABLE. Until then you can either follow -CURRENT (which is the branch leading up to the next 5.x release just as RELENG_4 is

dns/sendmail/resolve problems...

2004-07-07 Thread Gary Kline
On tao sendmail hangs forevr before it ever strts up. Anybody know why? thanks garY -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

WPC11 ver 3 or bust...

2004-07-07 Thread Eric Crist
Hey all, I posted almost a week ago about not being able to use my 16-bit PCMCIA Linksys WPC-11 v3 wifi card. This card always worked well under 4.9, but I can't get it to work under 5.2.1. The card is recognized, and I can even assign IP addresses and such, but it never associates to my

RE: dns/sendmail/resolve problems...

2004-07-07 Thread Eric Crist
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Kline Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 9:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dns/sendmail/resolve problems... On tao sendmail hangs forevr before it ever strts up. Anybody know why?

Re: WPC11 ver 3 or bust...

2004-07-07 Thread Andrew L. Gould
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 09:23 pm, Eric Crist wrote: Hey all, I posted almost a week ago about not being able to use my 16-bit PCMCIA Linksys WPC-11 v3 wifi card. This card always worked well under 4.9, but I can't get it to work under 5.2.1. The card is recognized, and I can even assign

peace

2004-07-07 Thread agha dilbar
Change the World with Peace and Prosperity 10-Million Urgent Peace letters to Head of States, UN, Parliaments, Political Parties, TV News Channels,International Newspapers, Magazines, Universities, Think tanks, AmnestyInternational and Welfare NGO’s, all over the WorldSubject: Friendship,

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Oliver Fuchs
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004, Chris wrote: Folks, I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would block this? If the above needs recompiling sendmail, then I would certainly prefer

RE: Devices not being built

2004-07-07 Thread Mike Sacauskis
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Kinkade Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Devices not being built On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 08:12:35PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: allowing users to mount cdrom again

2004-07-07 Thread Gautam Gopalakrishnan
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:41:59 +0200, Grant Speelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I read in the previous post about allowing users to mount cdrom and wanted to try it for myself I did the follow : added vfs.usermount=1 to /etc/sysctl.conf changed the permissions on /dev/acd0 to include the