Mihai Don??u mihai.do...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think the kernel is the one that initializes the
0, 1 and 2 file descriptors (stdin, stdout and stderr).
Correct so far.
I think you have to open them yourself ...
No, the shell does it. That's how it is able to set up
pipes and redirection.
David Rawling wrote:
Hi Brian
Indeed, I have a FreeBSD 8.0RC1 system running as my primary time
server for the home network. Since it's an Atom 330, it fully
supports 64-bit mode (an opportunity I have grasped with both hands).
I have one of the Acer ION gadgets running at home and
I installed kdebase-4.3.1_1, but cannot find konqueror.
It's supposed be a part of kdebase, isn't it?
many thanks
anton
--
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
On Wed 2009-11-11 12:35:55 UTC-0600, Jason Fried (r...@churchofbsd.org) wrote:
I have a fairly old install and not much room on my ROOT is there a way to
prevent freebsd-update from installing .symbols files.
In /etc/freebsd-update.conf:
IgnorePaths /boot/kernel/*.symbols
From reading the
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
I installed kdebase-4.3.1_1, but cannot find konqueror.
It's supposed be a part of kdebase, isn't it?
% grep konqueror /usr/ports/x11/kdebase4/pkg-plist
bin/konqueror
lib/libkdeinit4_konqueror.so
[...]
--Herbert
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Herbert J. Skuhra h.sku...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
wrote:
I installed kdebase-4.3.1_1, but cannot find konqueror.
It's supposed be a part of kdebase, isn't it?
% grep konqueror
Robin Becker opined:
...
I have one of the Acer ION gadgets running at home and that also uses the Atom
330. I cannot find any nice way to reduce the power consumption though as the
330 doesn't seem to support speedstep and my cpu is always running at 68C. Does
your board provide any power
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:57:02PM -0600, Jesús Abidan wrote:
i did it like you say, but something is happening with my installation, it
boots always the first OS, i don't have any ideas for having a dual
system... argh!!
Perchance, is your other system MS-Vista?
As I mentioned in a previous
Charlie Kester wrote:
On Wed 11 Nov 2009 at 17:32:41 PST Charlie Kester wrote:
One more thing:
Notice that the system call number (or any other dword) should also be
pushed onto the stack before the int 80h.
The reason for this is given at the top of the page:
although the kernel is
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:04:29AM -0600, Jesús Abidan wrote:
i think i have the problem...
i have two hard disks, IDE and SATA, i saw in my MS XP, my root label is F:
instead of C: maybe it is something related to jumpers or something like
that?
That is a little surprise to me, but I am
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 09:38:27AM -0600, Jesús Abidan wrote:
First, please send all messages to the freebsd-questions list and not
just to me. That is proper list etiquette, plus you will be able to
get responses from more than just me. Others may know more.
In other words, always do a
ok, sorry...
2009/11/12 Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 09:38:27AM -0600, Jesús Abidan wrote:
First, please send all messages to the freebsd-questions list and not
just to me. That is proper list etiquette, plus you will be able to
get responses from more than
no idea...
the machine had only one hard drive(PATA), then i plugged a new sata
HD(freebsd style), with information on it. The PATA drive is cofigured as
the primary disk, and the sata in bios it says is in PORT 0.
I'll try removing the SATA disk and install freebsd, maybe is the jumper
no, it is not the disk, i removed it and the same problem...
2009/11/12 Jesús Abidan jabi...@gmail.com
no idea...
the machine had only one hard drive(PATA), then i plugged a new sata
HD(freebsd style), with information on it. The PATA drive is cofigured as
the primary disk, and the sata in
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:43:21 -0500, David Jackson norsta...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having great difficulty running a very simple assembler program
on FreeBSD on x86 in my efforts to learn some assembly programming on
FreeBSD. I have tried to compile the following with nasm, however i
get
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:50 PM, usleepl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Herbert J. Skuhra h.sku...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
wrote:
I installed kdebase-4.3.1_1, but cannot find konqueror.
It's
Hello,
On Tuesday, I was all happy that I got APM working on my pre-2000 Compaq
Deskpro following these instructions:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=4619
On Wednesday, after configuring the router to wake the server whenever DHCP
leases are touched (quickdirty hack), I was
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:40:11 -0500, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote:
Well, the results of that test does not exactly exhilarate me.
# moused -f -d -p /dev/ums0
moused: unable to open /dev/ums0: Device busy
Seems that there's already a moused running. Use ps ax to
find it PID and simply
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 05:55:57PM -0500, APseudoUtopia wrote:
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Troels Kofoed Jacobsen
tkjacob...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
With pkg_version I can easily see which installed ports has newer
versions available, but what I miss is a way to see what has changed.
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:37:04 +0100
Polytropon Polytropon free...@edvax.de replied:
Well, the results of that test does not exactly exhilarate me.
# moused -f -d -p /dev/ums0
moused: unable to open /dev/ums0: Device busy
Seems that there's already a moused running. Use ps ax to
find it PID
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:40:11 -0500, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote:
Well, the results of that test does not exactly exhilarate me.
# moused -f -d -p /dev/ums0
moused: unable to open /dev/ums0: Device busy
Seems that there's already a moused
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:21:18 -0500, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote:
'moused' was running. I have no idea why though. I did not start it.
It surely was usbd.
Anyway, I killed it, confirmed it was dead, and then ran the command:
moused -f -d -p /dev/ums0
It failed again with a
Curious, how did you get it installed?
My motherboard doesn't have an IDE port (so, no IDE CD-ROM) and don't
think booting from USB-CDROM is supported
Booting from USB Flash drive works?
David Rawling wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Brian Whalen
Sent: Thu 12/11/2009 9:26 AM
I
23 matches
Mail list logo
