On 29 March 2011 10:05, Andre Goree an...@drenet.info wrote:
Thank you for responding.
For two reasons I know it's running zfs v14 after the rebuild:
1) During boot, a message shows:
ZFS Filesystem version 4
ZFS Storage pool version 14
2) After getting to the failed root mount point
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 06:03:07PM +0200, Eduardo wrote:
At 17:19 31/03/2011, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
What is FreeBSD c compiler?
Isn't it GCC?
Now yes, but FreeBSD needs an iso c'99 compiler and source code is
iso oriented, not gcc, afaik gcc hacks and code that only compiles on
Hi, Alan Cox
Thanks for your reply. I want to know why the NKPT set to 32 in
revision187465,
is it possible that set NKPT less or lager than 32? What's the limitation if
set NKPT to 32?
I also guess the KPTphys[] not used in kernel initialization on amd64 in
revision187465. And
I notice
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:17:16 -0400, Tom Worster f...@thefsb.org wrote:
I've no experience with VirtualBSD. But I can say that VBox comes with
host configs for FreeBSD 32 and 64 clients. Yesterday I fed the FreeBSD
8.2 RELEASE Disk 1 ISO into VBox and it installed very nicely. Network
even came
I know St. Peter won't call your name, freebsd-questions!
2011/03/30 22:00:14 +0100 Graham Bentley ad...@cpcnw.co.uk = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
GB Which GUI CD writing software can you recommend [less dependencies = better]
tkdvd
should use it patched for -joliet-long ever.
73! Peter
I just setup an nfs mount between two servers ...
ServerA, nfsd on 192.168.1.8
ServerB, nfs client on 192.168.1.7
I have a jail, ServerC, running on 192.168.1.7 ... most operations appear
to work, but it looks like 'special files' of a sort aren't working, for
when I try and startup Apache,
Searched in the mailing list but no luck. Has anyone set up a MythTV
backend? Any does anyone know of issues with the WinTV-PVR-350 on FreeBSD?
Derek
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Original Message
Subject:Video Capture Cards
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:38:32 -0500
From: Derek Funk dfu...@cox.net
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Searched in the mailing list but no luck. Has anyone set up a MythTV
backend? Any does anyone know of
Is it possible to mount a dump(8) dumpfile? restore(8) obviously knows
everything about the file structure, and restore -i is nearly a
read-only mount_dump already.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I've succeedig in getting a bit further ... by the time I got to the
bottom of my original, I started to think in terms of rpc more, and had
overlooked lookign at thte rpcbind man page, which *does* have a -h option
... setting that fixes things perfectly *almost* ...
The last issue I seem
I just setup an nfs mount between two servers ...
ServerA, nfsd on 192.168.1.8
ServerB, nfs client on 192.168.1.7
I have a jail, ServerC, running on 192.168.1.7 ... most operations
appear
to work, but it looks like 'special files' of a sort aren't working,
for
when I try and startup
I just setup an nfs mount between two servers ...
ServerA, nfsd on 192.168.1.8
ServerB, nfs client on 192.168.1.7
I have a jail, ServerC, running on 192.168.1.7 ... most operations
appear
to work, but it looks like 'special files' of a sort aren't working,
for
when I try and
Just in a thoughtful mood and thought I'd to the question to the cloud.
One of my biggest gripes with the ports system is dependency hell.
Ports link against so my optional components and pull them into the
install. Libraries and components are built based on make file
defines. But this
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:08:15PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
Is it possible to mount a dump(8) dumpfile? restore(8) obviously knows
everything about the file structure, and restore -i is nearly a
read-only mount_dump already.
I don't think so. It is a different structure.
jerry
I have multiple systems and jails at my home. I would very much like to
implement a single sign on strategy with kerberos. I think it's safer
than having private keys on every single box. I can easily do this for
shh user logins to multiple boxes. But I like to sign in as a user and
then
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Chris Telting wrote:
One of my biggest gripes with the ports system is dependency hell. Ports
link against so my optional components and pull them into the install.
Libraries and components are built based on make file defines. But this
doesn't have to be so. It's
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:58:04 -0700, Chris Telting christopher...@telting.org
wrote:
Just in a thoughtful mood and thought I'd to the question to the cloud.
Oh the joy of cloud computing, erm... discussion. :-)
One of my biggest gripes with the ports system is dependency hell.
Ports link
The number of console
programs that want to pull in X window or kde is
my boggling.
Hmmm... The only one I remember being that way is
the old cvsup, but there was nocvsup-nogui (or -nox11?).
Over the years I've found that ghostscript and gd are two common culprits.
Every time I see a
When I look for tuning guides online, or reading tuning(7) I find a
lot of guides for tuning a system for multiple users or for specific
purposes (web servers, file servers, etc)
I am looking for specific tunables that might make the experience of
using FreeBSD better. I found the sysctl
On 04/01/2011 17:51, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:58:04 -0700, Chris Teltingchristopher...@telting.org
wrote:
Just in a thoughtful mood and thought I'd to the question to the cloud.
Oh the joy of cloud computing, erm... discussion. :-)
Wasn't that the a subplot of the hitch
20 matches
Mail list logo
