Hello,
I have to use SMTP with AUTH to my ISP, and do this with
sendmail+saslauthd as described in the FreeBSD handbook; it works fine
for me in 9-CURRENT and now 10-CURRENT;
while digging for some other problem in the /var/log/maillog I struggled
about the line:
STARTTLS=client, relay=smtp.1b
On 11/18/11 00:12, Matthias Apitz wrote:
STARTTLS=client, relay=smtp.1blu.de., version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL
se below; what does the FAIL means exactly?
I have been reading on the subject and it appears you do not trust
the certificate
issuer for smtp.lblu.de.
___
On 18/11/2011 10:00, Edward Martinez wrote:
> On 11/18/11 00:12, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>> STARTTLS=client, relay=smtp.1blu.de., version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL
>>
>> se below; what does the FAIL means exactly?
>>
>I have been reading on the subject and it appears you do not trust
> the certifi
On 11/18/11 8:09 AM, Snoop wrote:
> Does anyone know if it's possible to configure lagg for network
> redundancy on a FreeBSD server containing jails? I'm having problems
> with that. I couldn't found much around therefore I'm not even sure it's
> "doable".
>
> Thanks in advance, any tip will be a
Hello,
Just wondering if anyone is using geom gate and could help me with huge
perf issue I am having.
Right now the set up is such : 3 drives on the same machine A, exported
through geom gate and connected to machine B.
On machine B I format the drives as freebsd-vinum and mount them in
strip
Jerome Herman wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone is using geom gate and could help me with huge
> perf issue I am having.
> Right now the set up is such : 3 drives on the same machine A, exported
> through geom gate and connected to machine B.
> On machine B I format the drives as freebsd-vinum
I use Amanda to make nightly backups of a bunch of servers using GNU tar.
However, gtar doesn't seem to respect its --one-file-system flag with /proc.
Amanda runs a variation of this command:
# /usr/local/bin/gtar --create --file - --directory / --one-file-system
--sparse --ignore-failed-re
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> My apologies to all for this, specially to those who already know about this
> and those who think too little of it.
>
> I am really worried about this:
>
> http://americancensorship.org/
Mario, I couldn't agree more and it's a very important
I am attempting to set below sysctls
/boot/loader.conf
net.isr.direct=1
net.isr.direct_force=1
but after rebut it still
sysctl -a|grep isr
net.isr.direct: 0
net.isr.direct_force: 0
Why it still zero?
OS: FreeBSD-RC1 amd64
___
freebsd-question
On Fri, November 18, 2011 10:34 am, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I use Amanda to make nightly backups of a bunch of servers using GNU tar.
> However, gtar doesn't seem to respect its --one-file-system flag with
> /proc. Amanda runs a variation of this command:
>
> # /usr/local/bin/gtar --create --fi
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Staal wrote:
> /proc is a file on /. /proc/* are files on /proc. The former is still on
> the root filesystem (if only as a directory stub to be used as a
> mountpoint), so reading it isn't leaving that filesystem. Reading
> anything *in* it would be.
>
On 11/18/11 5:22 PM, Виталий Владимирович wrote:
>
> I am attempting to set below sysctls
>
> /boot/loader.conf
> net.isr.direct=1
> net.isr.direct_force=1
>
> but after rebut it still
>
> sysctl -a|grep isr
>
> net.isr.direct: 0
> net.isr.direct_force: 0
>
> Why it still zero?
>
> O
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Nov 18 09:36:09 2011
> From: Kirk Strauser
> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:34:18 -0600
> To: FreeBSD Questions ML
> Subject: Shouldn't GNU tar be ignoring /proc with --one-file-system?
>
> I use Amanda to make nightly backups of a bunch of servers using
On 18/11/2011 17:18, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Staal wrote:
>
>> > /proc is a file on /. /proc/* are files on /proc. The former is still on
>> > the root filesystem (if only as a directory stub to be used as a
>> > mountpoint), so reading it isn't leaving
On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
> See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted filesystems on
> your machine.
$ mount | grep proc
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
>
> *NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate filesystem. It is merely a
> _directory_ with
Kes,
First, understand that the Realtek (re0) cards have significant
network problems when trying to saturate a network. If you have the
ability try switching to a Intel card (em0) for a lot better
performance, lower interrupts and less CPU usage.
Why interrupts are not handled by more CPUs than
Does anyone know of a webmail product that can provide access to local system
accounts? Even if it's just a script that runs /usr/bin/mail on behalf of the
user.
I'd like a simple way to access local system emails without having to forward
them to an actual mailbox
somewhere.__
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> I find it quite astonishing that /proc would deliberately behave
> differently to *every other* filesystem available. The mountpoint
> should belong to the filesystem mounted on it.
I have an idea what you mean by "belong to" in this case
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Errol Sayre wrote:
> Does anyone know of a webmail product that can provide access to local
> system accounts? Even if it's just a script that runs /usr/bin/mail on
> behalf of the user.
>
> I'd like a simple way to access local system emails without having to
>
--- Original message ---
From: "Damien Fleuriot"
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: 18 November 2011, 19:22:36
Subject: Re: net.isr.direct?
> On 11/18/11 5:22 PM, Виталий Владимирович wrote:
> >
> > I am attempting to set below sysctls
> >
> > /boot/loader.conf
> > net.isr.di
--- Original message ---
From: "Damien Fleuriot"
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: 18 November 2011, 19:22:36
Subject: Re: net.isr.direct?
> On 11/18/11 5:22 PM, Виталий Владимирович wrote:
> >
> > I am attempting to set below sysctls
> >
> > /boot/loader.conf
> > net.isr.di
Are you sure SquirrelMail will do this? I was under the impression (from their
requirements page) that it needs an IMAP backend.
On Nov 18, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Errol Sayre wrote:
> Does anyone know of a webmail product that can provide a
Size özel bülteni görmek için aşağıdaki linke tıklayınız:
Tıklayınız
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Fri, November 18, 2011 2:30 pm, Errol Sayre wrote:
> Are you sure SquirrelMail will do this? I was under the impression (from
> their requirements page) that it needs an IMAP backend.
In which case you'll want an IMAP server that can serve the local system
accounts. Not hard to set up.
Danie
Hi,
Reference:
> From: Errol Sayre
> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:23:26 +
> Message-id:
Errol Sayre wrote:
> Does anyone know of a webmail product that can provide access to local system
> accounts? Even if it's just a script that runs /usr/bin/mail on behalf of the
> use
Is it not possible/not intended for kernels to be updated via
freebsd-update? If kernels can be updated via freebsd-update
will there be a release of an fix/update that will allow systems
to be patched/updated to -p4 or later?
-Tom Carpenter
On 11/14/2011 05:25 AM, Evalyn wrote:
It touches th
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted filesystems on
your machine.
$ mount | grep proc
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
*NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate filesy
Здравствуйте, Виталий.
Вы писали 18 ноября 2011 г., 21:30:38:
ВВ> --- Original message ---
ВВ> From: "Damien Fleuriot"
ВВ> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
ВВ> Date: 18 November 2011, 19:22:36
ВВ> Subject: Re: net.isr.direct?
ВВ>
>> On 11/18/11 5:22 PM, Виталий Владимирович wrote:
>
On 18/11/2011 20:12, Tom Carpenter wrote:
> Is it not possible/not intended for kernels to be updated via
> freebsd-update? If kernels can be updated via freebsd-update
> will there be a release of an fix/update that will allow systems
> to be patched/updated to -p4 or later?
freebsd-update will c
CO> Kes,
CO> First, understand that the Realtek (re0) cards have significant
CO> network problems when trying to saturate a network. If you have the
CO> ability try switching to a Intel card (em0) for a lot better
CO> performance, lower interrupts and less CPU usage.
I know that problems with rea
On Nov 18, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Did you try /usr/ports/mail/openwebmail ? (Needs apache) Runs OK here.
I didn't, but I think Webmin's Read Mail module will do all that I need, plus
it has some other niceties.
Thanks everyone!___
So, I've run freebsd-update fetch/install a few times since I
posed my original question, but my system remains at
8.2-RELEASE-p3. Have I done all that I should to get word to
those that would be able to correct the problem? Is there
communication channel I should use to report this?
On 11/18/201
Kirk Strauser wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
> > See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted
> > filesystems on your machine.
>
> $ mount | grep proc
> procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
>
> > *NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate filesystem.
Errol Sayre wrote:
> Does anyone know of a webmail product that can provide access
> to local system accounts? Even if it's just a script that runs
> /usr/bin/mail on behalf of the user.
>
> I'd like a simple way to access local system emails without
> having to forward them to an actual mailbox
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Staal
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 18:00
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Shouldn't GNU tar be ignoring /proc with --one-file-
> system
I tried to install 9.0RC2 from the DVD ISO today. This defaults
to using bsdinstall instead of the 8.x sysinstall.
This process gave me an error, but I'm not sure in which forum
to discuss this problem/error. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
web...
--
William Bulley Email: w..
Hi!
I had a problem with memory on y computer with 8.2 and there are some mess. I
like to install "fresh" FreeBSD 9.0. Is it safe to install RC-2 or is better
to wait to the final release, please?
Thanks in advance.
Mitja
http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa
___
On Friday 18 November 2011 13:13:33 C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> > My apologies to all for this, specially to those who already know about
> > this and those who think too little of it.
> >
> > I am really worried about this:
> >
> > http://americanc
On 18/11/2011 21:27, William Bulley wrote:
> I tried to install 9.0RC2 from the DVD ISO today. This defaults
> to using bsdinstall instead of the 8.x sysinstall.
>
> This process gave me an error, but I'm not sure in which forum
> to discuss this problem/error. Thanks in advance.
freesd-questio
On 18/11/2011 22:24, ajtiM wrote:
> I had a problem with memory on y computer with 8.2 and there are some mess. I
> like to install "fresh" FreeBSD 9.0. Is it safe to install RC-2 or is better
> to wait to the final release, please?
9.0-RC2 is (probably) going to be very similar indeed to the ev
According to Matthew Seaman on Fri, 11/18/11
at 17:41:
> On 18/11/2011 21:27, William Bulley wrote:
> > I tried to install 9.0RC2 from the DVD ISO today. This defaults
> > to using bsdinstall instead of the 8.x sysinstall.
> >
> > This process gave me an error, but I'm not sure in which forum
>
On 11/18/11 15:00, William Bulley wrote:
According to Matthew Seaman on Fri, 11/18/11
at 17:41:
On 18/11/2011 21:27, William Bulley wrote:
I tried to install 9.0RC2 from the DVD ISO today. This defaults
to using bsdinstall instead of the 8.x sysinstall.
This process gave me an error, but I'
According to Edward Martinez on Fri, 11/18/11 at 19:53:
>
>Have you tried installing with "ACPI" disabled.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/bsdinstall-install-trouble.html#Q3.10.2.1.
>
> this also may be of some help:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/bsdinstall-part
Snoop wrote:
Does anyone know if it's possible to configure lagg for network
redundancy on a FreeBSD server containing jails? I'm having problems
with that. I couldn't found much around therefore I'm not even sure it's
"doable".
Thanks in advance, any tip will be appreciated.
--
Caselle
William Bulley wrote:
According to Edward Martinez on Fri, 11/18/11 at 19:53:
Have you tried installing with "ACPI" disabled.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/bsdinstall-install-trouble.html#Q3.10.2.1.
this also may be of some help:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/bsdi
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Xihong Yin wrote:
I set the adapter up.
Here is the output of 'dhclient em0'
DHCPREQUEST on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
DHCPACK from 192.168.3.1
bound to 192.168.3.41 -- renewal in 1800 seconds.
'ifconfig em0' output is
em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
option
I set the adapter up.
Here is the output of 'dhclient em0'
DHCPREQUEST on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
DHCPACK from 192.168.3.1
bound to 192.168.3.41 -- renewal in 1800 seconds.
'ifconfig em0' output is
em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=219b
ether 00:26:b9:9d:30:dc
New to me. Does the machine have any unusual settings, like a non-default
securelevel?
No. There are no unusual security settings.
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Xihong Yin wrote:
I set the adapter up.
Here is the output of 'dhclient em0'
DHCPREQUEST on em0
According to Fbsd8 on Fri, 11/18/11 at 21:02:
>
> I think you have under sized /usr and the uncompress ran out of space
> during the install. Start over again, wipe the disk clean (ie: delete
> all slices)and re-allocate your slices with larger space allocations.
Thanks.
While this is an olde
49 matches
Mail list logo
