Hi,
I have these warnings. Any known cause and solution ?
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0
$ dmesg
...
ubt0: Broadcom Corp BCM2045B, class 224/1, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 on usbus0
WARNING: attempt to domain_add(bluetooth) after domainfinalize()
WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize()
Hi,
I was wondering whether it would possible to get Google+ Hangout running
on Freebsd.
I am running firefox-10.0,1 installed from the ports on FreeBSD
8.2-STABLE #0:amd64
Trying to install the plugin from the Google+ page and I get an almost
finished message, but that is as far as it goes. I
Hi List
Is there a version of freebsd (preferably 8 upwards) that supports the PERC
H200 controller on Dell R210 II servers ? I've followed the thread at:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.stable/74192
But it seems somewhat inconclusive.
Thanks in Advance,
Traiano
On 02/17/12 17:59, The Todds wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering whether it would possible to get Google+ Hangout running
on Freebsd.
I am running firefox-10.0,1 installed from the ports on FreeBSD
8.2-STABLE #0:amd64
Trying to install the plugin from the Google+ page and I get an almost
finished
On 02/17/12 18:19, jb wrote:
Hi,
I have these warnings. Any known cause and solution ?
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0
$ dmesg
...
ubt0:Broadcom Corp BCM2045B, class 224/1, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 on usbus0
WARNING: attempt to domain_add(bluetooth) after domainfinalize()
WARNING: attempt to
Sorry top post, posting from phone.
8.2-stable, 9.0-release, will post a link with a tutorial when I hit my desk
On 17 Feb 2012, at 09:11, Traiano Welcome traiano.welc...@mtnbusiness.co.za
wrote:
Hi List
Is there a version of freebsd (preferably 8 upwards) that supports the PERC
H200
Chip Oakley silverskymus...@gmail.com wrote:
Am tempted to remove the drive and insert a new one, not sure as
there is memory on the drive available and nothing really wrong
with it.
If you don't mind losing everything currently on the drive,
overwriting the MBR -- and the backup GPT at the
On 17/02/2012 11:14, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Sorry top post, posting from phone.
8.2-stable, 9.0-release, will post a link with a tutorial when I hit my
desk
Thanks, Damien! Much appreciated!
On 17 Feb 2012, at 09:11, Traiano Welcome
traiano.welc...@mtnbusiness.co.za wrote:
Thanks interesting possibilities.
One thought I had is creating an operating system independent BIOS where
the appropriate machine code is inserted into the events that lead to an
override of the processes that is forcing into windows. Maybe burned to a
CD or USB, from another computer and tie
Hi Damien
Additional question:
On 17/02/2012 11:14, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Sorry top post, posting from phone.
8.2-stable, 9.0-release, will post a link with a tutorial when I hit my
desk
A lot of these Dell R210 II's ship with the S300 PERC. Does FreeBSD have
support for this
Hiya
I seem to have this problem with sysinstall, whereby I cant seem to download
the kernel source.
I tried following this example
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/freebsd-install-kernel-source-code/
I use Install from an FTP server
The error message I get is Unable to transfer the sbase
On 02/17/12 19:58, Chip Oakley wrote:
Thanks interesting possibilities.
One thought I had is creating an operating system independent BIOS where
the appropriate machine code is inserted into the events that lead to an
override of the processes that is forcing into windows. Maybe burned to a
CD
On 02/17/12 19:31, Brent Clark wrote:
Hiya
I seem to have this problem with sysinstall, whereby I cant seem to
download the kernel source.
I tried following this example
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/freebsd-install-kernel-source-code/
I use Install from an FTP server
The error message I
On 2/17/12 11:02 AM, Traiano Welcome wrote:
Hi Damien
Additional question:
On 17/02/2012 11:14, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Sorry top post, posting from phone.
8.2-stable, 9.0-release, will post a link with a tutorial when I hit my
desk
A lot of these Dell R210 II's
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:31:39 +0200
Brent Clark wrote:
I use Install from an FTP server
The error message I get is Unable to transfer the sbase distribution
from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org.;
Does anyone know of another way to get the kernel source.
Get it with csup and be sure to set the
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Antonio Olivares
olivares14...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Ryan Frederick
ryanrfreder...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like others have run into this problem with avahi-app as well:
Dear,
First, please accept my apologies for the disturbance.
I am a Senior Consultant Infrastructure Program Manager with 20 years
experience in IMT. I started my career with Digital in Sophia Antipolis in
1988 and over time, made my primary focus in IT Program/Project management.
Here are
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:08:54 -0600
Antonio Olivares wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Ryan Frederick
ryanrfreder...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like others have run into this problem with avahi-app as
well:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-July/068658.html
A
Dear,
First, please accept my apologies for the disturbance.
I am a Senior Consultant Infrastructure Program Manager with 20 years
experience in IMT. I started my career with Digital in Sophia Antipolis in
1988 and over time, made my primary focus in IT Program/Project management.
Here are
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:00:38 -0500, Jerry wrote:
It appears that ps is no-longer the format of choice but is being
replaced by PDF, a format that is natively supported by many printers.
Jerry, I wanted to point out that PS still seems to be the
format that _applications_ use as output format
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:32:07 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
w can i move a file from my home filesystem to my one disc drive
without using a GUI? i don't have a graphic interface on my FBSD
system and want to save a 600MB file to my cdrom?
thanks for tips on what i have Long forgotten!
I hope
On 02/17/12 23:14, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:00:38 -0500, Jerry wrote:
It appears that ps is no-longer the format of choice but is being
replaced by PDF, a format that is natively supported by many printers.
Jerry, I wanted to point out that PS still seems to be the
format that
Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
Anonymous.
I've kinda hijacked the thread to ask whether people slave the root zone
or not, and why if not.
Active poster,
Replacing the old battery with a new one usually solves this kind of
problem. I just did this yesterday ;)
On 2/17/12, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
guys, this is just a FWIW, but it's worth bearing in mind. i just
tried to change the bios settings so that the old computer would
boot
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:33:33 +1000, Da Rock wrote:
PDF is not exactly PS, but it does use a subset of the instructions.
That's correct, but both formats share essential parts of
functionality. Conversion between them is relatively easy.
The other thing you will notice is that its mostly on
On 02/17/12 23:33, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/17/12 23:14, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:00:38 -0500, Jerry wrote:
It appears that ps is no-longer the format of choice but is being
replaced by PDF, a format that is natively supported by many printers.
Jerry, I wanted to point out that PS
Hi,
On Friday 17 February 2012 08:49:37 Da Rock wrote:
On 02/17/12 11:21, Al Plant wrote:
I have not seen any action in 2 days.
There's been plenty of action in the last 2 days. Maybe check your mail
server logs for errors?
I noticed the same thing. The missing mails arrived all meanwhile
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:14:47 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
Think about that:
% netcat 192.168.123.456 /tmp/printing.pdf
I can do either:
nc 192.168.1.100 9100 /tmp/print.pdf
or nc 192.168.1.100 9100 /tmp/print.ps
right now without any problems.
If you looked at the
On 02/17/12 23:57, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:33:33 +1000, Da Rock wrote:
PDF is not exactly PS, but it does use a subset of the instructions.
That's correct, but both formats share essential parts of
functionality. Conversion between them is relatively easy.
The other thing
Hi,
On Thursday 16 February 2012 17:20:23 krad wrote:
On 14 February 2012 20:28, Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:47:08PM -0500, Mike Dockery wrote:
Greetings,
Aloha,
I have been a user of Linux since 1994, but most of the linux distros
On 02/18/12 00:22, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:14:47 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
Think about that:
% netcat 192.168.123.456 /tmp/printing.pdf
I can do either:
nc 192.168.1.100 9100 /tmp/print.pdf
or nc 192.168.1.100 9100 /tmp/print.ps
right now without
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Brent Clark wrote:
I seem to have this problem with sysinstall, whereby I cant seem to download
the kernel source.
I tried following this example
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/freebsd-install-kernel-source-code/
I use Install from an FTP server
The error message I get
Hello,
I'm setting up the email system on my server. I got rid of sendmail
and installed postfix, and I will be installing dovecot. I researched
the difference between mbox and maildir formats, and I'm going to go
with the Maildir. I'm running everything on ZFS, so many small files
shouldn't be a
On Fri, February 17, 2012 12:16 pm, APseudoUtopia wrote:
Hello,
I'm setting up the email system on my server. I got rid of sendmail
and installed postfix, and I will be installing dovecot. I researched
the difference between mbox and maildir formats, and I'm going to go
with the Maildir.
Hi,
Reference:
From: APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:16:29 -0500
Message-id:
CAKOHg=PpeqZjEN8Romfn=by2yrtjfjnj7-jqvogorrt+ygv...@mail.gmail.com
APseudoUtopia wrote:
Hello,
I'm setting up the email system on my server. I got rid of
On 17/02/2012 17:16, APseudoUtopia wrote:
Hello,
I'm setting up the email system on my server. I got rid of sendmail
and installed postfix, and I will be installing dovecot. I researched
the difference between mbox and maildir formats, and I'm going to go
with the Maildir. I'm running
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012, APseudoUtopia wrote:
Hello,
I'm setting up the email system on my server. I got rid of sendmail
and installed postfix, and I will be installing dovecot. I researched
the difference between mbox and maildir formats, and I'm going to go
with the Maildir. I'm running everything
Hello,
is there an equivalent to Linux' cryopid for FreeBSD?
http://code.google.com/p/cryopid/
Thanks,
-cpghost.
--
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:06:01 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
Mutt would be my choice. I have been using it for over a decade,
and it handles Maildir as well as other common mailbox formats.
Also pine should be able to handle it (even though it could
be called overcomplex in relation to
On 2/17/2012 11:16 AM, APseudoUtopia wrote:
Hello,
I'm setting up the email system on my server. I got rid of sendmail
and installed postfix, and I will be installing dovecot. I researched
the difference between mbox and maildir formats, and I'm going to go
with the Maildir. I'm running
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:41:57PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
Anonymous.
I've kinda hijacked the thread to ask whether
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:27:07PM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:27:07 +0100
From: Polytropon free...@edvax.de
Subject: Re: how can i offload a 600m file without graphic tools?
To: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Hiya,
A question has arisen with the implementation of bsdinstall in 9.x as
opposed to sysinstall in 8.x and previous versions of FreeBSD.
It has always been FreeBSD's default to create four partitions and swap
as such:
/
/tmp
/var
/usr
swap
The recent changes in 9.x with bsdinstall use a
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Robison, Dave wrote:
We'd like a show of hands to see if folks prefer the old style default with
4 partitions and swap, or the newer iteration with 1 partition and swap.
For a user/desktop machine, I prefer one root partition. For other roles like
a server, I
On Feb 16, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Da Rock wrote:
Problem, I think lies, in the symlink. You don't need it, kill it and run
nspluginwrapper - the only flash file in your browser plugins directory
should be prefixed with npwrapper.
There may be an issue with nspluginwrapper (currently being
On 17/02/2012 18:16, APseudoUtopia wrote:
Hello,
I'm setting up the email system on my server. I got rid of sendmail
and installed postfix, and I will be installing dovecot. I researched
the difference between mbox and maildir formats, and I'm going to go
with the Maildir. I'm running
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Swiger
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 2:18 PM
To: david.robi...@fisglobal.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: One or Four?
On Feb 17,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Robison, Dave
david.robi...@fisglobal.com wrote:
Hiya,
A question has arisen with the implementation of bsdinstall in 9.x as
opposed to sysinstall in 8.x and previous versions of FreeBSD.
It has always been FreeBSD's default to create four partitions and swap
Four? There should be five! :-)
Read on to find out why.
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:05:23 -0800, Robison, Dave wrote:
We'd like a show of hands to see if folks prefer the old style default
with 4 partitions and swap, or the newer iteration with 1 partition and
swap.
In my case, preference
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:05:23PM -0800, Robison, Dave wrote:
Hiya,
A question has arisen with the implementation of bsdinstall in 9.x as
opposed to sysinstall in 8.x and previous versions of FreeBSD.
It has always been FreeBSD's default to create four partitions and swap
as such:
Let the majority decide which layout is preferred for the default.
Why not add a selection to the installer, something like
this:
Partition scheme
[ ] all in one + swap
Create one partition containing all subtrees
plus one
I would prefer having the option of four partitions for fault tolerance reasons
if needed.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Devin Teske devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
On 02/18/12 08:40, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Robison, Dave
david.robi...@fisglobal.com wrote:
Hiya,
A question has arisen with the implementation of bsdinstall in 9.x as
opposed to sysinstall in 8.x and previous versions of FreeBSD.
It has always been FreeBSD's
I like this because it gives the user a choice, and it clearly lays out the
choices based on partition schemes instead of a less-specific 'machine use'
choice.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:46 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
Four? There should be five! :-)
Read on to
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jerry McAllister
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 2:53 PM
To: Polytropon
Cc: david.robi...@fisglobal.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: One or Four?
We'd like a show of hands to see if folks prefer the old style default
with 4 partitions and swap, or the newer iteration with 1 partition and
swap.
I've been doing Unix 30+ years, so there's a tendency to respond
Multiple, 'cos seeing a single 1 partition on a system normaly
meant it had
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:11:52 -0800, Devin Teske wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jerry McAllister
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 2:53 PM
To: Polytropon
Cc:
On 02/17/2012 15:22, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Let the majority decide which layout is preferred for the default.
No. Bad idea. Not on questions@, the list of the least clued up,
the list raw beginners are referred to subscribe to. At least get
a majority on hackers@ or current@ or arch@.
On 02/18/12 09:24, Robison, Dave wrote:
On 02/17/2012 15:22, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Let the majority decide which layout is preferred for the default.
No. Bad idea. Not on questions@, the list of the least clued up,
the list raw beginners are referred to subscribe to. At least get
a
is there a command which can show the size of the hard drive swap?
A df seems to avoid the swap area.
This would be on a live production server.
Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
a. A security issue
/tmp is by-default out-of-the-box world-writable (perms 1777).
Yes. It works as intended even when /tmp is part of a single root partition;
although mounting /tmp as a RAM- or swap-based tmpfs filesystem might be better
On 2/17/2012 6:54 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
is there a command which can show the size of the hard drive swap?
% pstat -T
438/12328 files
98M/10240M swap space
---Mike
--
---
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, m...@sentex.net
Providing Internet
On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
is there a command which can show the size of the hard drive swap?
A df seems to avoid the swap area.
You're looking for swapinfo
Regards,
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/17/2012 05:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
Anonymous.
Given their success
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:cswi...@mac.com]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 3:56 PM
To: Devin Teske
Cc: FreeBSD -
Subject: Re: One or Four?
On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
a. A security issue
/tmp is by-default out-of-the-box
On Feb 17, 2012 6:55 PM, Jim Pazarena fqu...@paz.bz wrote:
is there a command which can show the size of the hard drive swap?
A df seems to avoid the swap area.
This would be on a live production server.
Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 02/17/2012 15:55, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Yes. It works as intended even when /tmp is part of a single root partition;
although mounting /tmp as a RAM- or swap-based tmpfs filesystem might be better
for many situations.
Sure it has its uses, but now you're jumping into new territory where
On 02/17/2012 15:58, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
is there a command which can show the size of the hard drive swap?
A df seems to avoid the swap area.
You're looking for swapinfo
Regards,
Chuck beat me to it.
swapinfo or top are the two ways I
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:cswi...@mac.com]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 3:56 PM
To: Devin Teske
Cc: FreeBSD -
Subject: Re: One or Four?
On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
[snip]
I'd argue that there should never be a single-/ unless you
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Polytropon wrote:
Why not add a selection to the installer, something like
this:
Partition scheme
[ ] all in one + swap
Create one partition containing all subtrees
plus one swap partition.
[ ]
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robison, Dave
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 4:11 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: swap space
On 02/17/2012 15:58, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On
Well I deleted the symlinks, swfdec, and stepped through the
instructions in the handbook again.
Now when I run nspluginwrapper -v -a -i as a user I get the following,
Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
Looking for plugins in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
Auto-install
On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
However, for whatever reasons, the overwhelming majority of folks using MacOS
X don't have problems using a single root partition, and while they
sometimes do
fill up their disks, that's a situation which they should be able to recover
from
On 02/17/12 19:27, sean wrote:
Now when I run nspluginwrapper -v -a -i as a user I get the following,
Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
Looking for plugins in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin
Looking for
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:cswi...@mac.com]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 4:41 PM
To: Devin Teske
Cc: 'FreeBSD -'
Subject: Re: One or Four?
On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
However, for whatever reasons, the overwhelming majority of folks
On 02/18/12 10:40, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
However, for whatever reasons, the overwhelming majority of folks using MacOS
X don't have problems using a single root partition, and while they sometimes do
fill up their disks, that's a situation which
On 02/18/12 10:48, sean wrote:
On 02/17/12 19:27, sean wrote:
Now when I run nspluginwrapper -v -a -i as a user I get the following,
Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
Looking for plugins in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
Auto-install plugins from
On 02/18/12 10:55, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/18/12 10:40, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
However, for whatever reasons, the overwhelming majority of folks
using MacOS
X don't have problems using a single root partition, and while they
sometimes do
fill up their
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Da Rock
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 4:55 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: One or Four?
On 02/18/12 10:40, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Feb 17,
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Da Rock
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 5:00 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: One or Four?
On 02/18/12 10:55, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/18/12
On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:10 PM, Robison, Dave wrote:
On 02/17/2012 15:55, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Yes. It works as intended even when /tmp is part of a single root
partition; although mounting /tmp as a RAM- or swap-based tmpfs filesystem
might be better for many situations.
Sure it has its
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org wrote:
Why not add a selection to the installer, something like
this:
Partition scheme
[ ] all in one + swap
Create one partition containing all subtrees
plus one
On 02/18/12 11:17, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Chris Hillch...@monochrome.org wrote:
Why not add a selection to the installer, something like
this:
Partition scheme
[ ] all in one + swap
Create one partition
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 07:48:31PM -0500, sean wrote:
On 02/17/12 19:27, sean wrote:
Now when I run nspluginwrapper -v -a -i as a user I get the following,
Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
Looking for plugins in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
Auto-install
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Robison, Dave wrote:
We'd like a show of hands to see if folks prefer the old style default with
4 partitions and swap, or the newer iteration with 1 partition and swap.
I only run servers and set them up with /, /usr, and swap. Other partitions
are placed on
Can anyone suggest a MUA which has support for Maildir that I can use?
Pine is dead, replaced by alpine. The FreeBSD port has a config option
to support maildirs. I've used it, it works.
R's,
John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi,
On Saturday 18 February 2012 05:05:23 Robison, Dave wrote:
It has always been FreeBSD's default to create four partitions and swap
as such:
/
/tmp
/var
/usr
swap
it really makes sense to keep it this way.
The recent changes in 9.x with bsdinstall use a default behavior which
--As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to have
said:
Well, to be honest, I never liked the old style default
with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned before, _my_
default style for separated partitions include:
/
swap
/tmp
/var
On 02/18/12 12:16, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to
have said:
Well, to be honest, I never liked the old style default
with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned before, _my_
default style for separated partitions include:
/
2012-02-17 23:46, Polytropon skrev:
Four? There should be five! :-)
Read on to find out why.
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:05:23 -0800, Robison, Dave wrote:
We'd like a show of hands to see if folks prefer the old style default
with 4 partitions and swap, or the newer iteration with 1 partition
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to have
said:
Well, to be honest, I never liked the old style default
with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned before, _my_
default style for separated partitions include:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 17 16:20:48 2012
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:05:23 -0800
From: Robison, Dave david.robi...@fisglobal.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: One or Four?
Hiya,
A question has arisen with the implementation of bsdinstall in 9.x as
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 17 16:25:49 2012
From: sean tech.j...@myfairpoint.net
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:20:26 -0500
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Adobe Linux Flash
On Feb 16, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Da Rock wrote:
Problem, I think lies, in the
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 17 17:59:50 2012
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:54:18 -0800
From: Jim Pazarena fqu...@paz.bz
To: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: swap space
is there a command which can show the size of the hard drive swap?
A df
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 17 19:56:00 2012
From: Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:50:44 -0800
To: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: One or Four?
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Robison, Dave wrote:
We'd like a show of
On 17 February 2012, at 23:21, Robert Bonomi wrote:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 17 19:56:00 2012
From: Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:50:44 -0800
To: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: One or Four?
On Feb 17,
96 matches
Mail list logo