I am absolutely new to FreeBSD and would like a simple 'by the hand'
explanation of how to install and use FreeBSD on a Pc. I tried to follow the
info from its website but explanations seem too cryptic for me to understand
properly. I'd like to try it on a empty partition of my hard drive,
Hi Ashkan,
I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the feature
set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS
because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator.
true. it is consistently slow.
REALLY from what tale do
i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided.
i want to share it on network via nfs.
which file system is better for it?
thank you
badly imprecise question. you may share any filesystem.
Not sure what you want to achieve. No explanation of raided - this means
nothing without precise description.
are showing me. Read performance OTOH is strange, zpool and systat both
reporting consistently an aggregated read speed of around 120MB/s during
the block read tests (which seems a bit slow for the drives - and indeed
systat reports the drives at less than 50% utilisation) but bonnie is only
be well within patent law to apply for a patent.
The patent office has never been very good at examining software
patents, and I have made a lot of money helping companies document the
prior art not cited in patents that are being asserted against them.
good there are people that helps.
Bad
Wojciech Puchar writes:
Bad that there are patents at all. Not just in software.
Patents are - or should be - the means, not the end. The end
is encourage people to create new stuff; the means of encouragement
is to give them exclusive rights for a limited time. As long as the
idea
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 08:48:56 -0400
Robert Huff articulated:
Wojciech Puchar writes:
Bad that there are patents at all. Not just in software.
Patents are - or should be - the means, not the end. The end
is encourage people to create new stuff; the means of encouragement
is to
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 13:29:51 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
are showing me. Read performance OTOH is strange, zpool and systat both
reporting consistently an aggregated read speed of around 120MB/s during
the block read tests (which seems a bit slow for
Jerry writes:
I agree up to the point about financial incentive. For myself, I
like making money. I don't apologize for that. Most engineers,
software / hardware designers also enjoy receiving a monetary
reward for their hard work. Simple giving away our hard work,
sweat and time to
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 03:46:53PM -0500, Marco Muskus wrote:
Hi Ashkan,
I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the
feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first
I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will
gonna be the
snip
Discover it alone. I told already enough about it but it results in attacks
from ZFS (and general new technology) fanatics.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
First surprise, with only 4GB I had set primarycache=metadata,
you mean 4 GIGABYTES of memory is ONLY?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the
feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first
I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will
gonna be the differentiator.
The idea that ZFS is faster than XFS is certainly a new one for me.
If the rest of the world thought like you we would still be trying to invent
the wheel.
???
what wheel.
UFS is already invented. For LONG time. And UFS+softupdates works great.
much better than new trash
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 12:25:31 -0400
Robert Huff articulated:
Jerry writes:
I agree up to the point about financial incentive. For myself, I
like making money. I don't apologize for that. Most engineers,
software / hardware designers also enjoy receiving a monetary
reward for their
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 20:02:54 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
First surprise, with only 4GB I had set primarycache=metadata,
you mean 4 GIGABYTES of memory is ONLY?
At less than €30 - yes I think only is reasonable, I'd have bought
more but 4GB
I'm searching for a simple way to create a screenshot from
a web page, i. e. convert the rendered page into a PNG (or
something similar) graphic format. This is intended to be
used for usability and design visualization where different
components of the web page can be colored using Gimp to
show
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
I'm searching for a simple way to create a screenshot from
a web page, i. e. convert the rendered page into a PNG (or
something similar) graphic format. This is intended to be
used for usability and design visualization where
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
I never stated than anyone should be denied the right to create or write
basically whatever they so desire; however, if they are going to
piggyback their work on another author or developer's works, then that
individual deserves
On Sunday 05 August 2012 19:41:38 Polytropon wrote:
The idea of taking a screenshot from the web browser may
look sufficient at first, but it is problematic when the
web page doesn't fit horizontally or vertically
snip
How would you suggest to solve this task?
How about the Pixlr Grabber
Hi all,
On 05.08.2012 20:41, Polytropon wrote:
[website to picture cli]
google search comes up with
http://code.google.com/p/wkhtmltopdf/
which also provides a download called
wkhtmltoimage
... which in turn seems to be what you want.
cheers,
frank\
--
43rd Law of Computing:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
I'm searching for a simple way to create a screenshot from
a web page, i. e. convert the rendered page into a PNG (or
something similar) graphic format. This is intended to be
used for usability and design visualization where
79288...@gmail.com has requested to automatically forward mail to your email
address freebsd-questions@freebsd.org.
Confirmation code: 87581243
To allow 79288...@gmail.com to automatically forward mail to your address,
please click the link below to confirm the request:
El 05/08/12 06:22, Wojciech Puchar escribió:
Hi Ashkan,
I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the
feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll
go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be
the differentiator.
true. it
El 05/08/12 13:03, Wojciech Puchar escribió:
I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the
feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first
I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will
gonna be the differentiator.
The idea that ZFS is
really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best.
Yes UFS is very good, but very hight IO ZFS is fastest if you use L2ARC/ZIL
on SSD.
if...
better just move heavy used things on SSD and rest on HDD. really it's
fastest.
___
with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the
differentiator.
true. it is consistently slow.
REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements.
There is no tale, only a feature set:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Features
And everything everyone writes is
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:33:20 -0400
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 08:48:56 -0400
Robert Huff articulated:
[Snip]
The socialists still feel they are entitled to something
for nothing.
Jerry;
Forgive me for barging in like this but to me, what your sentence
describes
I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS
This is not up for discussion.
but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future.
Too many iPads, iPhones, etc?
For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk
If not spelling, or grammar...
and speed
when you must use the parameter -z of moused?
I had an Apple Mighty Mouse and I would like to use the track ball (the wheel
part)
The driver UMS detects the Z Axis and the Wheel [XYZW]
ums0: Mitsumi Electric Apple Optical USB Mouse, class 0/0, rev 1.10/1.08, addr
4 on usbus1
ums0: 4 buttons
--As of August 5, 2012 10:29:16 AM -0600, Chad Perrin is alleged to have
said:
I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the
feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first
I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will
gonna be the
31 matches
Mail list logo
