I destroyed my zpool but forgot to take the tar backup of /home folder. I was
wondering if there's any way to restore the zpool? This was a single-HDD
pool.
zpool import -D shows the poolname but also shows that pool is unavailable
and faulted.
zdb commands give no records available for poolname
Andrei Brezan wrote:
[snip]
Also what i've noticed is that 'p' as a suffix is for percona.
Oops! And I was thinking Percona but for some reason PostgreSQL came out my
fingers! DOH!
-Mike
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
El día Thursday, March 07, 2013 a las 07:01:12AM +0100, Matthias Apitz escribió:
El día Wednesday, March 06, 2013 a las 04:00:36PM -0500, Derrick Dantavious
Edwards escribió:
Hi,
I continue to get this error when I attempt to compile ekiga3. Any ideas?
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
On 31-3-2013 12:02, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, March 07, 2013 a las 07:01:12AM +0100, Matthias Apitz escribió:
El día Wednesday, March 06, 2013 a las 04:00:36PM -0500, Derrick Dantavious
Edwards escribió:
Hi,
I continue to get this error when I attempt to compile ekiga3.
El día Sunday, March 31, 2013 a las 01:35:43PM +0200, Koop Mast escribió:
gnome-icon-theme = 3.0.0) were not met:
No package 'gtk+-3.0' found
Requested 'gnome-icon-theme = 3.0.0' but version of gnome-icon-theme is
2.30.3
So, we FreeBSD folks, have no chance to build Ekiga 4.0.x :-(
kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 09:22:22AM -0400, Maikoda Sutter wrote:
If I use the kernel as a basis for my own system and modify the kernel
should I still maintain the licensing of the kernel bits, or could release
it under it's own license?
For example: I would like to
Hello list,
It seems I'm experiencing some issues while trying to install packages
that have dependencies that have other dependencies as well, or at least
that's how I understand it.
# uname -a
FreeBSD host.example.com 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue
Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC
On 31-3-2013 15:30, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Sunday, March 31, 2013 a las 01:35:43PM +0200, Koop Mast escribió:
gnome-icon-theme = 3.0.0) were not met:
No package 'gtk+-3.0' found
Requested 'gnome-icon-theme = 3.0.0' but version of gnome-icon-theme is 2.30.3
So, we FreeBSD folks, have no
On Mar 31, 2013, at 6:39 AM, Joe fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 09:22:22AM -0400, Maikoda Sutter wrote:
If I use the kernel as a basis for my own system and modify the kernel
should I still maintain the licensing of the kernel bits, or could
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:39:29 -0400, Joe wrote:
Does one have to file legal paper work with the government to be issued
a copyright on software?
With _which_ government? :-)
Basic understanding of copyright is: The stuff _you_ write
happens automatically under _your_ copyright, because you
are
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:31:43 +0200, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:39:29 -0400, Joe wrote:
Does one have to file legal paper work with the government to be issued
a copyright on software?
With _which_ government? :-)
Basic understanding of copyright is: The stuff
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:43:27 +0200, Michael Ross wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:31:43 +0200, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:39:29 -0400, Joe wrote:
Does one have to file legal paper work with the government to be issued
a copyright on software?
With _which_
On 03/31/13 16:07, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
On 03/31/2013 08:58 AM, Andrei Brezan wrote:
Hello list,
It seems I'm experiencing some issues while trying to install packages
that have dependencies that have other dependencies as well, or at least
that's how I understand it.
# uname -a
FreeBSD
Hi!
I installed smartmontools, start_smartd=yes I have in rc.conf and I edited
/usr/local/etc/smart.conf where I have:
/dev/ada0 -a -d auto -o on -S on -s (S/../.././02|L/../../6/03) -m root
When I use top there are no smartd and if I run smartd again than top shows me
smartd for few seconds
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:25:32 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
I installed smartmontools, start_smartd=yes I have in rc.conf
Without further investigation - shouldn't that be
smartd_enable=YES
conforming to the syntax of other service start commands?
At least that might be the reason why smartd
Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:25:32 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
I installed smartmontools, start_smartd=yes I have in rc.conf
Without further investigation - shouldn't that be
smartd_enable=YES
conforming to the syntax of other service start commands?
At least that might be the
On Monday, April 01, 2013 00:39:53 Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:25:32 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
I installed smartmontools, start_smartd=yes I have in rc.conf
Without further investigation - shouldn't that be
smartd_enable=YES
conforming to the syntax of other service start
On Sunday, March 31, 2013 19:24:49 Michael Powell wrote:
Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:25:32 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
I installed smartmontools, start_smartd=yes I have in rc.conf
Without further investigation - shouldn't that be
smartd_enable=YES
conforming to the syntax
Greetings...
I checked at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi and found
no open bug-reports; and nothing on -questions for March. Maybe it's
confined to my system, or I missed an UPDATING notice; if not, I'll go
to the maintainer and/or file a bug report. Before I do that are there
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:20:05PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
[...]
I'm using since some years http://www.aioe.org/ which has no binary
groups (i.e. no porn or warez) and a cache of 25 days. Just works.
The remaining users of de.* often say they filter postings injected
over this server
Hi all,
I am in the midst of setting up the framework for new servers using FreeBSD
9.1. I used the bsdinstall and Manual`` option when setting up the disk
geometry using GPT - graphical setup.
The idea will be to eventually dump the 4 file systems, (/, /usr /var and
/home) and restore
Hi,
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 21:28:40 -0400
Grant Peel gp...@thenetnow.com wrote:
I am in the midst of setting up the framework for new servers using
FreeBSD 9.1. I used the bsdinstall and Manual`` option when setting
up the disk geometry using GPT - graphical setup.
The idea will be to
On 3/31/2013 8:54 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
I have had only one problem with this description. I could not boot
from a GPT setup on my machine done as described there. But I have a
disk done with PCBSD based on 9.0 which booted well. I cannot tell you
if this is a problem caused by a later
On 3/31/2013 8:28 PM, Grant Peel wrote:
I was wondering in anyone sees any issues creating the drive geometry using
this method, with the intent of restoring dumped filesystems to to,
including the root filesystem.
Geometry or partition size? If it's geometry, and you need to worry
about it,
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:12:06PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
[...]
Back then you had to have brains to be on the net, now everyone is
web 2.0, and they're satisfied with ridiculous web forums. Any
brains today are all but forced to use them because the population
is so slim anywhere else.
On 31 March 2013, at 18:28, Grant Peel gp...@thenetnow.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am in the midst of setting up the framework for new servers using FreeBSD
9.1. I used the bsdinstall and Manual`` option when setting up the disk
geometry using GPT - graphical setup.
The idea will be to
Hi everyone. recently my server started having issues with DNS and FTP
sessions either not resolving or timing out. I've tracked the issue down to
IPFW. if I issue a 'sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.enable=0' then my issues go away.
I have the basic rules like this for dns;
01160 allow udp from any
Hi everyone. recently my server started having issues with DNS and FTP
sessions either not resolving or timing out. I've tracked the issue down to
IPFW. if I issue a 'sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.enable=0' then my issues go away.
I have the basic rules like this for dns;
01160 allow udp from any
It would be really helpful if you'd post the ruleset.
At first glance, your stateful rules seem rather wrong, unless there's
a check-state above. Also, in and out aren't discriminating enough -
every packet is seen by the ruleset more than once. You should think
in terms of interfaces,
On 03/31/2013 08:58 AM, Andrei Brezan wrote:
Hello list,
It seems I'm experiencing some issues while trying to install packages
that have dependencies that have other dependencies as well, or at least
that's how I understand it.
# uname -a
FreeBSD host.example.com 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD
Thanks for the response... here's my full rullset:
# ipfw list
00100 check-state
00101 allow tcp from any to any established
00102 allow ip from any to any out keep-state
00103 allow icmp from any to any
00201 allow ip from any to any via lo0
00202 allow ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8
00203 allow ip
Don O'Neil wrote:
Hi everyone. recently my server started having issues with DNS and FTP
sessions either not resolving or timing out. I've tracked the issue down
to IPFW. if I issue a 'sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.enable=0' then my issues go
away.
[snip]
I'm probably not smart enough to be able
I'll give you a more cogent reply tomorrow - if you use keep-state
rules, you want to be a little more specific - for tcp, you want
allow tcp from X to Y setup keep-state - i.e. you start the stateful
rule on packets that have the SYN flag set. There are some other
oddities here - I'm guessing
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm probably not smart enough to be able to help directly with your problem
but I'd like to add that there is a snowballing DNS Amplification ddos
attack against SpamHaus going on which is spilling over
Yes, this is
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_short_lifetime ?
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_udp_lifetime ?
You might want to increase these, given the current state of things...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
Are pkg dependent on FreeBSD Version?
I've moved two 9.1 machines and I have one 8.2 that I would like to move
to pkg.
So can I move the 8.2 machine also?
Thanks
/Leslie
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
36 matches
Mail list logo
