On 22/08/2013 21:07, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Greetings again. After doing a freebsd-update, my system is starting
up differently than it was before. I want to figure out why before I
come here and say it's broken.
Is there a way to say show me all of the commands you are running
during startup?
On 22 August 2013, at 13:07, Paul Hoffman phoff...@proper.com wrote:
Greetings again. After doing a freebsd-update, my system is starting up
differently than it was before. I want to figure out why before I come here
and say it's broken.
Is there a way to say show me all of the commands
On 23 August 2013 10:41, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
On 22 August 2013, at 13:07, Paul Hoffman phoff...@proper.com wrote:
Greetings again. After doing a freebsd-update, my system is starting up
differently than it was before. I want to figure out why before I come here
and say it's
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
Is anyone using the current port of hugin successfully on 9.1?
I've never used it before but an attempt to start it crashes:
$ hugin
/usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/top_five.py
CAT:Control Points
NAM:keep 5 CPs per image pair
On 08/23/13 07:10, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
Is anyone using the current port of hugin successfully on 9.1? I've
never used it before but an attempt to start it crashes:
$ hugin /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/top_five.py CAT:Control
Points NAM:keep 5
Anyone know why FreeBSD would give g_vfs_done errors with EDEADLK?
Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65968111616,
length=32768)]error = 11
Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65968373760,
length=32768)]error = 11
Aug 22 15:31:14
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 4:38:00 pm varanasi sainath wrote:
Thanks for the support.
I want to use the uuid's found using sysctl -a in fstab.
/dev/gptid/ has only uuid for boot partition.
You probably have the other GPT paritions already mounted via
another name which removes the names
On Monday, July 29, 2013 3:31:49 am varanasi sainath wrote:
Hello,
I am writing a kernel module in which I am trying to connect to a UNIX
socket
(UNIX domain sockets use the file system as their address name space).
Kernel module (loadable) acts as a client and User mode program acts as
On 08/22/13 17:46, Matt Miller wrote:
We ran into the following scenario in an application recently and were
wondering if the behavior of kern_jail_set() is as expected here.
This was an application bug where we were in, say, the JID 1 context
and tried to call jailparam_set() with the flags
