Re: Throughput test with iperf...

2013-09-29 Thread takCoder
thanks for your reply.. :) i think it's iperf.. i installed /usr/ports/benchmarks/iperf port. where can i find iperf2? my machines are both FreeBsds but i can't find iperf2 in my ports collection.. Best Regards, t.a.k On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Doug Hardie wrote: > On 28 September 2013

Re: Throughput test with iperf...

2013-09-29 Thread Doug Hardie
On 28 September 2013, at 23:38, takCoder wrote: > hi again.. > > would any of you please at least explain it to me what may cause iperf > server ending up with "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" message right at > the beginning of setting second connection in my bi-directional throughput > test,

Re: Throughput test with iperf...

2013-09-29 Thread Doug Hardie
On 29 September 2013, at 01:20, takCoder wrote: > thanks for your reply.. :) > > i think it's iperf.. i installed /usr/ports/benchmarks/iperf port. > where can i find iperf2? my machines are both FreeBsds but i can't find > iperf2 in my ports collection.. Bad memory - its iperf3. There is n

Re: Throughput test with iperf...

2013-09-29 Thread takCoder
Thank you, Doug, I'll check it :) Best Regards, t.a.k On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Doug Hardie wrote: > > On 29 September 2013, at 01:20, takCoder wrote: > > > thanks for your reply.. :) > > > > i think it's iperf.. i installed /usr/ports/benchmarks/iperf port. > > where can i find iperf

Re: Is it possible to suspend to disk with geli+Root on ZFS installation

2013-09-29 Thread Ian Smith
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 486, Issue 7, Message: 5 On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 16:25:33 +0200 Roland Smith wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:37:55PM +1000, yudi v wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Is it possible to suspend to disk (hibernate) when using geli for full disk > > encryption. > > A

Re: How to ask a DNS resolver listening on a different port than the tcp/udp 53

2013-09-29 Thread Bernt Hansson
On 2013-09-28 09:37, loran42o wrote: Le 28.09.2013 00:08, Terje Elde a écrit : On 28. sep. 2013, at 00:03, Frank Leonhardt wrote: If I understand the way it works correctly, the resolver pulls a list of the NS and hard-sets the port number for each to 53 (via a manifest constant) . See libc

Re: How to ask a DNS resolver listening on a different port than the tcp/udp 53

2013-09-29 Thread Laurent SALIN
Hi, for the list archive, here's how I solved my "problem". Some on the thread tell me to run BIND on the 1rst VPS, as DNS autoritative server and as caching resolver who let only hosts from my network send him queries. Well I'm quite happy my setup with NSD as DNS autoritative and UNBOUND as cach

Re: after pkgng update, daily run still using pkg_info

2013-09-29 Thread Gary Aitken
>>On 09/28/13 10:52, Gary Aitken wrote: >> After switching to pkgng, I noticed that my daily run output constantly >> complains about the installed packages being corrupt, e.g.: >> "pkg_info: the package info for package 'asciidoc-8.6.8_1' is corrupt" >> >> The problem is with >> etc/periodic/

Re: after pkgng update, daily run still using pkg_info

2013-09-29 Thread Gary Aitken
>>On 09/28/13 10:52, Gary Aitken wrote: >> After switching to pkgng, I noticed that my daily run output constantly >> complains about the installed packages being corrupt, e.g.: >> "pkg_info: the package info for package 'asciidoc-8.6.8_1' is corrupt" >> >> The problem is with >> etc/periodic/