Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions switching
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 July 2011 09:51, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:51AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
steve == ENOMONEY jeffr == ENOTIME
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
(OT, yes, but I'd like to take a stab at explaining why these things
fall to the wayside..)
On 7 July 2011 12:08, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
What would be the point to even start looking at an issue
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:33:44PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
For the record, I would like to see enforced public review for _every_
patch *before* it is checked in, as a strong rule. gcc system
Hi,
[re-sent publicly, I did not Replied-to-all:)]
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:33:44PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote
