wua.la is what you search for
java based, maybe in qemu or linux emulation..
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi all,
I have 7.2-RELEASE and a bridge between ath0 and sis0 everything works
fine except ipv6 including router advertisements.
There is no filtering, just a L2 bridge without any address. rtadv
comes from lan/sis. What could be missing?
bridge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu
1500
et
Larry Smith wrote:
I'm a newbie trying to upgrade 'lsof'. 'Portupgrade -a' goes well except for
lsof and a couple of files that depend on it (gnome-system-monitor,
gnome-applets, etc.)
I have cvs'ed my ports tree, did portsdb, pkgdb and portsclean over the last
couple of days to see if it
Steve Bertrand wrote:
I believe that the problem is this: even if configured to be an
authoritative server, BIND will respond to a query about zones
outside what it has authoritative data for with data from its cache
if that data is present. As there is only one cache per instance of
BIND, en
Jonathan Chen wrote:
If this were true, the "view" feature would be broken. I've just tried
this with a client-based ACL, and there doesn't appear to any
cache-leaking across views. Any counter-examples would be welcome.
I did this tests too. No leaks found.
;; WARNING: recursion requested
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Anyone using this?
I've used it for a long time on a 6.x box and it worked fine.
Recently I had to deactivate it since it seems to lock away every IP
which is listed in the logs.
Running on all my Servers like a charm...
no Problems known... RELENG_7 i386 and amd64 (fed
On 21.04.11 19:56, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for graphical tools easing configuration of a bind
> DNS-server. Ideally this tool should be capable of editing
> IPv6-related records like too.
>
> Is there anything available out there for FreeBSD (I already checked
> the ports co
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>
> Did you have any reason to think that would work?
> I would expect the syntax to be more like
> CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-TRIMTSIP
makes sense, I think this could really work...
Thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma
On 19.10.10 03:03, Adam Vande More wrote:
> I would recommend staying away from m0n0wall. It's poorly supported now,
> and buggy. Example:
> http://forum.m0n0.ch/index.php?PHPSESSID=1t2d5fp3t82ghgc7a7crmd0653&topic=2025.15
>
I see no evidence of "buggy" there. And are you really in the position
On 01.11.10 01:03, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Sunday 31 October 2010 20:02:58 Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> sysinstall isn't really intended for post-install use: you should probably
> learn how to use gpart instead - e.g.
>
Maybe sade (sysadmins disk editor) would help too... looks like
sysinstall's dis
On 23.04.10 18:02, Onur Aslan wrote:
> $ cat /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf
> option domain-name-servers 8.8.8.8, 8.8.8.4;
>
8.8.8.4 is not a valid Nameserver. You want 8.8.4.4...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
Hi,
the Makefile try to get the patches for 2.2.12, but the newest from
www.openinfo.co.uk are still 2.1.11
=> indexing-2.1.12-0.1.patch.gz doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/distfiles/mailman.
=> Attempting to fetch from http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/patches/444879/.
fetch:
http://www.openinfo.
On 17.08.10 04:13, Mark Shroyer wrote:
> That isn't to say you won't see any negative consequences from
> overwriting a running port with a newer version. Hypothetically, you
> might install a new Python including a new standard library, and if your
> running (old) Python process tries to load on
On 15.09.10 21:10, Wolfgang Riegler wrote:
> > I thought gateway_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf should be sufficient. But
> > it doesn't work. Do I need something else?
> >
> >
Looks all ok.
But does 192.168.40.1 have a route to 192.168.50.0/24 via GW
192.168.40.122?
> > Internet:
> > Destinat
14 matches
Mail list logo