>
> ...deliberately breaking OpenBSD's support for Adaptec hardware as some
> sort of ultimatum is a childish and self-destructive action. I hope
> the other OpenBSD committers veto any such action as being
> counterproductive and harmful to your users.
Horsecookies. What was done was
> you guys want to produce fully open and unencumbered stuff. That's
> wonderful. But why is it so important to go around screaming and
> yelling about it and alientating those who do try to help? Let me
> tell you, Doug is about the most positive and supportive guy you'll
> ever have at Adaptec
> Sorry, I got suckered into a side argument about why the kernel driver
> in OpenBSD sucks. Yes, the management app is closed, but the driver is
> open. And if the OpenBSD driver sucks and people want it to stop
> crashing and don't want to go beating their heads against the wall at
> Adaptec a
> Of course, sooner or later someone will kindly point them in the
> direction of electronic documentation, in which case I'm sure they'll
> come up with the "oops, our Acrobat licence expired"-excuse.
Your flippant reply, doesn't illustrate the source of the real
problem. Companies in
> I'm not stuffing anything down anyone's throats. I'm enabling FreeBSD
> users to use the resources that are available to them. That's quite
> different than cancelling developer work and threatening to remove a
> driver due to a political dispute. Freedom isn't about coercing others
> to be
* Constantine A. Murenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-12 15:07]:
> On 11/06/06, Hamorszky Balazs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I'm looking for some help on an article on wikipedia.
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open_source_operating_systems
>
> Whilst there, what about another im
