hi,
this 11k lines of fortran compile and run under Linux,
on FreeBSD 5.4, compiling with f77 produces a binary, apparently without
errors, but
executing it, inmediately gives 'Abort', ldd gives signal 6
ktrace is not very helpful :-)
36372 ktrace RET ktrace 0
36372 ktrace
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 11:00:46AM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
this 11k lines of fortran compile and run under Linux,
on FreeBSD 5.4, compiling with f77 produces a binary, apparently without
errors, but
executing it, inmediately gives 'Abort', ldd gives signal 6
ktrace
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm running into some odd headaches regarding what looks like iSCSI initiat=
ors
going to sleep for approximately 30 seconds before returning to life and
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In our last exciting episode, Danny Braniss (da...@cs.huji.ac.il) said:
I guess it's time to fix this.
danny
Thank you very much for the pointer
All,
I was wondering what people thought of iSCSI and FreeBSD. Is it a viable
option for creating SANs?
refrase question.
I want to move away from tape backups, and have numerous production
FreeBSD machines that I need to back up data from.
for one, it depends on how deep are your
hi danny
you are asking too many questions :-), but w/r to netapp:
same computer, 1gbE, NFS is about 50% slower than FC.
btw, iSCSI (still beta) is only slightly faster than NFS
(note NFS is UDP, iSCSI is TCP).
as to reliability, the netapp is worth avery penny (actualy K$ :-), had only
At 1:25 PM -0600 10/17/05, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:vi was the first screen/cursor-based editor in computer
:history.
Are you sure about this? I was using screen oriented editors over a
1200 baud dialup
