would utf2ascii be any help here or recode ?? both are in ports
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 03:11 -0600, David J Brooks wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 November 2007 02:19:35 am Yuri wrote:
> > > > All programs just show the character itself when I paste it :-)
> > >
> > > Have you tried kcharselect ?
> >
> > T
Yupp as soon as Beta3 arrived i see problems even getting it to load,
takes 5 minutes to just start it, though i dont know if i can say its
the OS
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 09:30 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> Has anybody had any recent problems exec'ing evo? Say, in
> just the past several
On Jan 17, 2012, at 10:17 AM, David Walker wrote:
> A colleague and I were talking about operating systems and I said, hey
> lets install FreeBSD and see what Gnome looks like.
> I did an install at work but ran out of time so I brought another
> machine home but I'm having trouble.
>
> I burnt
Hrmm odd cause my Z60M lenovo said the largest drive i could buy was
120G, but sensing the fact that was only due to specs i opted to buy a
250G SATA i plugged it in and it worked fine. might be the specs were
based on drive sizes available at the time ?
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 09:51:24 -0500
Jonathan
Umm not sure why you think you cant becuase i do it now
just
have
src-all
ports-all
On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 13:03 +0200, Mel wrote:
> On Saturday 01 September 2007 12:31:33 Grant Peel wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Can I use
> >
> > src-all and ports-all in the same supfile?
> >
> Nope. But you can
Umm not sure why you think you cant becuase i do it now
just
have
src-all
ports-all
On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 13:03 +0200, Mel wrote:
> On Saturday 01 September 2007 12:31:33 Grant Peel wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Can I use
> >
> > src-all and ports-all in the same supfile?
> >
> Nope. But you can
Any info on the status of XEN on CURRENt... ? Working, semi working or
just plain broken still
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTEC
Ok wizards
Nginx Lighttpd Fast-cgi and PHP5
seems all configured, yet when i point a browser at a php page
it tries to download the file, instead of render it in the browser,
any ideas what i missed
--nginx.conf--
#user nobody;
worker_processes 1;
events {
worker_con
Ok wizards
Nginx Lighttpd Fast-cgi and PHP5
seems all configured, yet when i point a browser at a php page
it tries to download the file, instead of render it in the browser,
any ideas what i missed
--nginx.conf--
#user nobody;
worker_processes 1;
events {
worker_con
Also IBM Z series, like my Z60M Runs 6, and 7 CURRENT really well
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 11:05 -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Steve Franks wrote:
> > The freebsd laptop page is a nice resource, but it's a bit heavy on
> > specifics (i.e. I have a laptop I want to install on), not so good
> > gen
But i still dont see any ipv6 data in the ifconfig for dc0, we had an
instance where ipv6 being turned off networking stopped functioning
in your ifconfig dc0 should show inet6 data like lo0 does. make sure its
commented out of rc.conf and reboot. also is this a generic kernel or
did you customize
ttach my
> config file ?
>
> Eugen
>
> On Feb 6, 2008 8:46 PM, OutBackDingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But i still dont see any ipv6 data in the ifconfig for dc0, we had an
> > instance where ipv6 being turned off networking stopped functioning
> >
> &g
I was going to go with them for their XEN based hosting, but i sent them
an email, asking a couple questions, they never replied, so went with
Verio instead
> Is anyone here using RootBSD?
>
> I'm currently with JohnCompanies. Overall, it's been a positive
> experience, though I wish they offered
the libvirt stuff might be a clue, a while back I designed a virtual
system using libvirt and some ported linux code, which basiclaly acted
as an enhanced chroot for apache, ftp, mail, pop3, imap. also NTT has a
derivitive version of FreeBSD with hints at virtualization, im waiting
for our Verio to
It might be nice if the RootBSD people answered their email inquiries, i
know they have lost customers, me for one for not answering a simple
email
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 13:35 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Maxim Khitrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-18 22:37:13+]:
> > Is anyone here using
Yes
FreeBSD 7
Asterisk
Asterisk-GUI
both from ports
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 07:49 -0400, Thomas Mullins wrote:
> Is anyone using FreeBSD for their VOIP PBX needs? If so, what software
> are you using? And any recommendations for software to look at would be
> greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> Shan
if you want to suffer alot of pain on an incomplete system you could go
this way, id still build my own from ports
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 14:43 +0200, Johan Hendriks wrote:
> >Is anyone using FreeBSD for their VOIP PBX needs? If so, what software
> >are you using? And any recommendations for sof
> How many Zimbabwe dollars, I wonder? This seems to give the finest
> measurement for approximations to zero...
I think this is a bit uncalled for, it might have been in a candid
manner, but there are alot of locations in the world using FreeBSD
quite effectively where most people live on less
ROFL, right, whatever..!!!
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 04:40 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> full of fallacies, false assumptions and one or two non
> sequiturs.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qu
Take this advice very seriously from someone who has already
done this effectively, you wount be able to accomplish this
yourself, it will take months, and more then just a few good c
coders to accomplish. its really a bad idea for what little you
gain versus the amount of work involved.
On T
I have a working config for non-HVM systems, its stable enough to play with but
not for production, if you have however a HVM machine, FreeBSD runs great
under linux KVM
On Friday 08 August 2008 22:46:11 Elwell, Richard wrote:
> Sorry about the premature sending. Here is the complete question:
I would only attempot this in Hypervisor mode where FreeBSD runs fine stock
I dont think paravirtualized XEN FreeBSD instances are ready for production.
Though I can assure you running FreeBSD 7 and CUURENt under linux KVM works
fine, i have 13 hosts on two HVM capable systems under Ubuntu
On Mo
whats redirecting the requests to the apache server? is it on piublic or
private ip block ? whats it set to listen on IP wise ? what about a changed
netmask ?
On Saturday 16 August 2008 15:55:11 Robin Becker wrote:
> After a recent change of ISP and hence our external IP address I find
> that ou
23 matches
Mail list logo