I've been running FreeBSD 6.0 stable on an A8N-SLI Premium amd64 box
with 2gb of ram for a few weeks now and it has been running well, but
some of the analysis I run needs more ram, so I dropped in another 2 gb
and started having all sorts of weird problems, such as DHCP failure and
running very
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:19:07 +1100, Robert Leftwich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've been running FreeBSD 6.0 stable on an A8N-SLI Premium amd64 box
with 2gb of ram for a few weeks now and it has been running well, ...[snip]
Forgot to mention, I'm running a kernel with 'options SMP' + GENERIC
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:10:34 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
off, then everything works, but FreeBSD can only see 3gb of ram. Some
documentation suggested a custom kernel with 'options PAE' enabled
would be required, but adding that generates an 'invalid option PEA'
After running some number crunching for the last twelve hours I noticed
my box starting to use swap. Given that it has 4gb in it (of which 3gb
is available, see my other email for that issue) and I know that the app
never uses more than around 1gb I was surprised. Looking at the numbers
from top I
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:29:03 +0100, Erik Norgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Do you run other applications also?
There was a discussion on CURRENT@ some weeks ago about a memory leak
that turned out to be firefox with some extensions, updates are
available now.
Unfortunately no, its cli
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:40:54 -0500, David Scheidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
I've seen (very, very, very, very) large memory leaks on long-lived
Python processes. I haven't looked at it to figure out if it's
python, some module, or the application doing something stupid. But
the processes
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:58:07 -0500, Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Robert Leftwich wrote:
Possibly your database is using lots of SysV shared memory, which
would explain why wired is going up so much, otherwise perhaps
something in the kernel
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:00:46 +1100, Robert Leftwich
I can't see anything that explains the discrepancy. Below is the top -o
size after a reboot, followed by the current top after 8 datasets (the
extra python process is the analysis app - at a low memory usage point):
Oops, just noticed
Joseph Kerian wrote:
I was planning on purchasing one of these boards in the near future, so I'm
rather interested if you have solved this particular problem. In no
particular order, my suggestions are:
-The A8N-SLI's are extremely picky about the RAM you give them; have you
double checked with
