http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/index.html
Imprvoments perhaps here:
http://www.fsmlabs.com/products/rtcorebsd/
best regards Theo
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe
please read here:
http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/index.html
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Benchmarks of all BSD's and Linux
http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/index.html
-
Benchmark-tables only in german language
Also a comparison with SCO-OpenUnix 8
http://www.wikiservice.at/dse/wiki.cg
On Thursday 13 October 2005 00:36, Gary Kline wrote:
> Second question: as its default, firefox uses mplayer for
> both real and windows audio streams. Why and can I chance at
> least the Real Audio to use /usr/local/bin/realplay?
I use an extension for firefox which let me c
I see that:
ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change
suggests the advertising clause may simply be deleted - but it's been 4
years since this was issued and the code is still contradictory.
Thanks,
Theo
--
Theo Markettos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Liphook, Hampshire, UK
re: http://osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=10032&offset=15&rows=28
See a posting from Scott Long of FreeBSD;
---
Thanks for going to a public forum and saying I am full of crap.
I really appreciate that. Boy, you sure do want to see all of
our projects do well, don't you.
Apparently you have ze
nto the openbsd-misc
list, but anyways....
First, Theo is full of crap. I'll say that again: Theo is full of
crap. I don't think that he's actually interested in making the AAC
cards work. Instead, I think that he's interested in stirring
controversy, petty bullying, and silly &#
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >>While I understand what you want Theo lets not remove the support for
> >>stuff that currently works. I just spent $349 on a Adaptec RAID card
> >>for my home server and if the support is removed I will be very upset.
> >>The d
lic posting sites and slag me, instead of
calling you your buddy Doug and saying "Hey, these guys have a point,
and you really ought to sell it to Adaptec management, since you are
the guy who can make this change, as you already told Theo and others
four months previously that you were the gu
> It's not a binary driver, it's a 2-clause BSD licensed driver that
> contains full source. You said that the OpenBSD driver is unstable,
> so I offered to help. That has nothing to do with binary apps.
> Deleting it from the OpenBSD tree is always an option, of course.
The driver is free, but
> It's not a binary driver, it's a 2-clause BSD licensed driver that
> contains full source. You said that the OpenBSD driver is unstable,
> so I offered to help. That has nothing to do with binary apps.
From
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/pds.cgi?ports/sysutils/aaccli
Sources for ports/s
> Sigh. Theo, there are lots of ways of interacting with other people:
> if you go out of your way to antagonize somebody, the result is
> generally not going to be positive. I think Scott is mature enough to
> continue to help other BSD projects-- including OpenBSD-- regardless,
> I personally don't care about Adaptec anymore, but I do care about the
> people there. If LSI or whoever else can provide better support, then
> that's fine with me. I do however have quite a bit of experience in
> knowing how things work at Adaptec and knowing what compromises can be
> made.
> What part of the FreeBSD AAC driver is closed, emcumbered, or otherwise
> non-free?
The bits that do management.
Therefore, the bits that let it do what RAID controllers are meant to do.
Can you fully operate an aac(4) card -- 100% of it's abilities, on a
FreeBSD machine, without using a bina
> I'll heartily agree that there is little reason for any company to
> keep information like this closed.
Yet you are not helping.
> But going around making personal
> attacks on company employees that don't give you the cookie you want
> is pretty shitty too.
Then I guess that Doug Richardson m
ng one fights for. Freedom is not something that
just happens.
Freedom is something that happens when someone puts their toes out there,
with a stance, an attempt, a struggle.
Freedom is not something that happens when Scott long makes apologies
for Adaptec and slags Theo on public sites ... when
rays RIGHT
> NOW. No, they don't meet the goals of open source, but they meet the
> goals of getting the job done. If not having the source is a problem,
> then that's your choice and you don't have to use it. But why deprive
> people of a choice, like Theo wan
te time and resources
> to fight the noble causes like Theo does, and I think that cooperation
> and comprise are better in the long run than constant conflict. If
> Theo or anyone else wants help on making the kernel driver better,
> let me know. If they want to help Adaptec follow throu
t;
> While I'm sure nobody's perfect...surely there are other vendors who
> produce products which aren't so buggy in the first place, who fix
> their bugs once they find them, and warn people what to look out for?
>
> Frankly, if Mr. Long is providing an accurate desc
Adaptec, as a vendor, really cares about you.
That is why their commercial contacts disable their email accounts
when the shit hits the fan.
That is Doug Richardson
Title? Global Channel Marketing Manager
The guy who said *HE* was the one responsible for changing views within
Adaptec.
Buggy h
> There has got to be a better way to work with the vendors in order to
> get the support we need. It just seem to me that the "screw you guys, I
> am going home" stuff just does not work.
Well, there is.
We do it all the time!
We mail a vendor, and then we start a frank dialogue. I (or some
Since the original Adaptec guy Doug has blocked his mail, here is the
email address of the next person at Adaptec who is involved in this.
He has also previously indicated that he would be involved in any
decision to provide documentation on the aac RAID management
interface.
Marty Turner
[EMAIL
about being able to
have drivers for their hardware.
Otherwise what you are asking for is simply ... that the developer's
hands be tied.
Flat out, you are wrong. This affects everyone.
>
> -Tomas Quintero
> FreeBSD User
>
>
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:10:29 -0700, Theo de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is another person who can be talked to
about this matter. He just sent me a long private mail, none of
which really indicates that anything is really happening at
Adaptec about our concerns.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing lis
I have received information from a few sources that indicates that
Adaptec does not have documentation on their management interface
in-house. They only have a source-code implimentation, for a variety
of models.
So that is perhaps why they are so slow.
That does however speak rather badly. I h
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 01:08:32PM +0200, Toomas Aas wrote:
> Maybe there is something in the Perl code above that is immediately obvious to
> anyone knowing Perl, but IANAP.
Yeah, it's the issue that caused 2.63 to be released. perl 5.005 doesn't
like that subscript trick. we fixed the issue a
how to make it so that tun
interfaces are cloneable?
thanks
theo purmer
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
27 matches
Mail list logo
