Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 builworld failed

2003-07-14 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost ¨áᯮ«ì§®¢ âì cvsup 4.x- 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction'

Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 builworld failed

2003-07-14 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost ¨áᯮ«ì§®¢ âì cvsup 4.x- 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction'

Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 builworld failed

2003-07-14 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost ¨áᯮ«ì§®¢ âì cvsup 4.x- 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction'

Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail

2003-07-14 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost use cvsup 4.x- 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0):

Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail

2003-07-14 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost use cvsup 4.x- 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0):

Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail builworld

2003-07-14 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost use cvsup 4.x- 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0):

Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail builworld

2003-07-17 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost use cvsup 4.x- 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0):

Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail builworld

2003-07-17 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost use cvsup 4.x- 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0):

Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail builworld

2003-07-17 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost use cvsup 4.x- 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0):

Conexant modem HCF

2003-08-09 Thread Tokarev
In next 4.x,5.x reliases included Conexant HCF,HSF modem drivers??? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Conexant modem HCF

2003-08-09 Thread Tokarev
In next 4.x,5.x reliases included Conexant HCF,HSF modem drivers??? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvsup freebsd 5.1 fail

2003-07-11 Thread Tokarev
Hello all. cvsup problem 4.8-5.1 make bildworld building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask':

Re: devel/anjuta: creating project does not offer project's dialog.

2011-07-01 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
01.07.2011, 11:49, O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de: On 07/01/11 09:35, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:  01.07.2011, 11:06, O. Hartmann  And, for those actively developing, is there a good alternative to  Anjuta (no KDevelop, since I do not like KDE and do not have KDE). Thanks,  Oliver

Driver for orinoco classic from turbocell.

2005-04-14 Thread Sergey Tokarev
Hello, I`m tech ingeneer from isp Leader Plus Lugansk,Ukraine. Support driver from turbocell karlnet is expected? Pls Reply. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send