Strange behavior of MTU on loopback interfaces.

2011-02-24 Thread c0re
Hello all! I'm testing setting lower MTU on loopback interfaces to avoid some MTU problems with IPSEC in a path of traffic. ifconfig lo1 create ifconfig lo1 mtu 1300 ifconfig lo1 5.5.5.5/32 # ifconfig lo1 lo1: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1300 inet 5.5.5.5

Re: Strange behavior of MTU on loopback interfaces.

2011-02-25 Thread c0re
2011/2/25 Nikos Vassiliadis nv...@gmx.com: On 2/25/2011 9:29 AM, c0re wrote: Hello all! I'm testing setting lower MTU on loopback interfaces to avoid some MTU problems with IPSEC in a path of traffic. ifconfig lo1 create ifconfig lo1 mtu 1300 ifconfig lo1 5.5.5.5/32 # ifconfig lo1 lo1

Re: / file system is full, but du does not show that it's full

2011-02-28 Thread c0re
2011/1/6 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk: On 06/01/2011 11:26, c0re wrote: # df -h Filesystem     Size    Used   Avail Capacity  Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a    496M    466M   -9.8M   102%    / So it's full. But by du it's not appeared to be full # du -hxd 1 / 2.0K    /.snap

Re: / file system is full, but du does not show that it's full

2011-02-28 Thread c0re
2011/2/28 Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com: From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org  Mon Feb 28 05:31:46 2011 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:24:30 +0300 From: c0re nr1c...@gmail.com To: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re

Re: Portupgrade and Updating the portsdb

2011-03-09 Thread c0re
2011/2/11 ill...@gmail.com ill...@gmail.com: On 10 February 2011 08:33, c0re nr1c...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all! I've got set of servers that uses NFS mounted /usr/ports. When I use portupgrade samba on 1st server it says [/usr/ports/INDEX-7.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid

Optimizing pam_ldap and nss_ldap

2011-04-07 Thread c0re
Hello freebsd users! I've got Openldap 2.4.23 that used as authentication and authorization server for about 40-50 servers. OS - FreeBSD 8.1. It's not heavy loaded. openldap# top -SP last pid: 45647; load averages: 0.15, 0.15, 0.07 up 81+22:29:21 15:18:57 99 processes: 3 running, 80

freebsd-update 8.1 to 8.1-p1

2010-09-27 Thread c0re
Hello freebsd-questions! I've installed freebsd 8.1 and made freebsd-update fetch freebsd-update install reboot And in uname -a I still see 8.1-RELEASE, but I want to see 8.1-RELEASE-p1. In /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh I see that it is 8.1-p1 REVISION=8.1 BRANCH=RELEASE-p1 Why is it so? I

Re: freebsd-update 8.1 to 8.1-p1

2010-09-27 Thread c0re
But freebsd-update should do it. Rebuilding kernel will prevent from further freebsd-update patches to rebuilded GENERIC. 2010/9/27 Phan Quoc Hien phanquoch...@gmail.com: Try rebuild your kernel and get 8.1-RELEASE-p1! I did it! On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:29 PM, c0re nr1c...@gmail.com wrote

Re: freebsd-update 8.1 to 8.1-p1

2010-09-27 Thread c0re
spake: Try rebuild your kernel and get 8.1-RELEASE-p1! I did it! On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:29 PM, c0re nr1c...@gmail.com wrote: Hello freebsd-questions! I've installed freebsd 8.1 and made freebsd-update fetch freebsd-update install reboot And in uname -a I still see 8.1-RELEASE, but I

/usr/ports via NFS on several servers adn parralell portupgrade

2010-09-30 Thread c0re
Hello all! I found one problem using portupgrade on a number of servers, that has NFS mounter /usr/ports from one server. On one server portupgrade sometimes want to rebuild /usr/ports/INDEX-7.db. While it rebuilds, another portupgrade running on second server suddenly wants to rebuild

Upgrading to higher major version directly or via small steps?

2010-10-04 Thread c0re
Hello all! I'm interested in 2 updates: - from 6.2 to 7.3 and - from 6.2 to 8.1 Can I update directly from 6.2 to 7.3? like set RELENG_7_3 in supfile and make csup. Or I should update to 6.4, then to 7.0, and then to 7.3? And same question about upgrading from 6.2 to 8.1 - can i csup directly

Re: Upgrading to higher major version directly or via small steps?

2010-10-05 Thread c0re
, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:47 PM, c0re nr1c...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all! I'm interested in 2 updates: - from 6.2 to 7.3 and - from 6.2 to 8.1 Can I update directly from 6.2 to 7.3? like set RELENG_7_3 in supfile and make csup. Or I should update to 6.4, then to 7.0, and then to 7.3? And same

openssl version - how to verify

2010-11-15 Thread c0re
Hey all! If I look at base openssl in 7.3-RELEASE-p3 sys# openssl version -a OpenSSL 0.9.8e 23 Feb 2007 built on: Mon Sep 27 11:54:36 MSD 2010 platform: FreeBSD-i386 options: bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(idx,int) des(ptr,risc1,16,long) blowfish(idx) compiler: cc OPENSSLDIR: /etc/ssl but at

Re: openssl version - how to verify

2010-11-15 Thread c0re
2010/11/15 Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net: On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:17:10 +0300 c0re nr1c...@gmail.com articulated: If I look at base openssl in 7.3-RELEASE-p3 sys# openssl version -a OpenSSL 0.9.8e 23 Feb 2007 built on: Mon Sep 27 11:54:36 MSD 2010 platform: FreeBSD-i386 options:  bn

Re: openssl version - how to verify

2010-11-15 Thread c0re
. 2010/11/15 Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net: On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:40:27 +0300 c0re nr1c...@gmail.com articulated: There are still too many broken ports with openssl from ports, I do not like debug it and really like to use base openssl, almost no difference. Might I suggest that if you

Re: openssl version - how to verify

2010-11-16 Thread c0re
2010/11/16 Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com: On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:28 AM, c0re nr1c...@gmail.com wrote: Jerry, I'm not about that :) base openssl are OK. But I need proves that it has got no security problems - it's external IT auditors request. And I'm interested how I can know

Re: openssl version - how to verify

2010-11-17 Thread c0re
2010/11/16 Dennis Glatting d...@penx.com: On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 10:28 +0300, c0re wrote: Jerry, I'm not about that :) base openssl are OK. But I need proves that it has got no security problems - it's external IT auditors request. And I'm interested how I can know what patchlevel

Re: openssl version - how to verify

2010-11-22 Thread c0re
2010/11/15 Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:41:32 +1030 Indexer inde...@internode.on.net articulated: It breaks alot, and causes you to need to rebuild some parts of the base system. The most notable, is SSHD, which

Want sendmail applying aliases to 'cc:' field too

2010-12-10 Thread c0re
Hey all! I've got /etc/mail/aliases file like user: u...@site1.domain.com user2: us...@site1.domain.com user3: us...@site2.domain.com When someone from Internet send email to u...@domain.com with cc: to us...@domain.com sendmail send mail to user and user3 normaly, they recieve their mail. But

Re: Want sendmail applying aliases to 'cc:' field too

2010-12-10 Thread c0re
2010/12/10 tomasz dereszynski toma...@paraklet.net: Generally reading documentation helps. then google... http://www.google.co.uk/search?source=ighl=enrlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUK294=q=sendmail+aliasesbtnG=Google+Searchaq=foq= first URL... http://www.feep.net/sendmail/tutorial/intro/aliases.html t

Re: do i need a dedicated ip address for https?

2010-12-22 Thread c0re
2010/12/22 S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com: http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054 # Set up SSL protection on your website. is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address, when i want to use ssl on my domain? thank you happy Christmas! :)

/ file system is full, but du does not show that it's full

2011-01-06 Thread c0re
# df -h Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a496M466M -9.8M 102%/ So it's full. But by du it's not appeared to be full # du -hxd 1 / 2.0K/.snap 512B/dev 2.0K/tmp 2.0K/usr 2.0K/var 1.9M/etc 2.0K/cdrom 2.0K/dist 1.0M

Re: / file system is full, but du does not show that it's full

2011-01-06 Thread c0re
2011/1/6 Ryan Coleman ryan.cole...@cwis.biz: What about filehandlers? On Jan 6, 2011, at 5:26 AM, c0re wrote: # df -h Filesystem     Size    Used   Avail Capacity  Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a    496M    466M   -9.8M   102%    / So it's full. But by du it's not appeared to be full # du

Re: / file system is full, but du does not show that it's full

2011-01-06 Thread c0re
2011/1/6 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk: On 06/01/2011 11:26, c0re wrote: # df -h Filesystem     Size    Used   Avail Capacity  Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a    496M    466M   -9.8M   102%    / So it's full. But by du it's not appeared to be full # du -hxd 1 / 2.0K    /.snap

Re: / file system is full, but du does not show that it's full

2011-01-06 Thread c0re
why not to restart your httpd and mysqld? This may release your unused filehandles. As I said I've restarted whole server, so nothing there to release at all. Another place to look for wasted space is filesystem snapshots, if any. They can be created implicitly, e. g., by fsck. Yeah, I

Portupgrade and Updating the portsdb

2011-02-10 Thread c0re
Hello all! I've got set of servers that uses NFS mounted /usr/ports. When I use portupgrade samba on 1st server it says [/usr/ports/INDEX-7.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument] [Updating the portsdb format:bdb_btree in /usr/ports ... - 22601 port entries found error] Remove