4.10-stable nameserver strange behavior
Hi: How I refresh a system binary? More specifically, I think I may have a compromised(?) named in /usr/sbin but what I have in /usr/obj should be fine; if not I still have it in /usr/src and can rebuild/reinstall it. So how would I do the named only part of an installworld? Or, to take it another step back, how to do the named only part of a buildworld, followed by the named only part of an installworld? I have the dead-tree versions of both the Handbook Lehey's book. Or, where might I find this/these procedures documented? Actually, what has really happened is a wierdness I'm trying to correct: (Maybe my named has been compromised somehow but there have been no messages in the nightly security runs.) In the wee hours of the morning, my upstream cablemodem provider dhcp'ed me a new ip-address. Ok, fine... (Dhclient seems working fine from what the system log tcpdump are showing.) I can ping/traceroute (to) my system from outside (proper stuff shows up in tcpdump too) but I can't ping/traceroute *from* my system to anywhere (not even by ip-address). I can ping myself (the newly assigned ip-address just fine. Hmm, name service isn't working correctly (I run a local cache-only DNS, BIND 8.3.7, ya, old but someday...), so I kill restart named. The appropriate named startup messages appear in the messages-log, e.g. listening on [new ip-address]. Here's the wierd part: tcpdump shows DNS priming requests (to the various *.root-servers.net addresses) with a *source* ip of my *previous* ip-address, not the new one. So far, *no* NS requests show the proper source address; they all show the old ip-address not the new one. Also, so far, behavior survives reloading, restarting completely killing restarting named. Umm... what else can I think of... No external IPs are in the named config and/or zone files, only local 192.168 127 things. I can't find any zombie processes so far(?) OS is: 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #0: Sun Nov 28 03:17:35 CST 2004 Yes, I know, very old... I do plan to upgrade... This system is very creaky nowadays I'm very reluctant to reboot it; might not come back up. :( Ideas? Many thanks, -kc ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.10-stable nameserver strange behavior
Ken Cochran writes: How I refresh a system binary? deletia Assuming your source tree is the same version as installed system ... I have been able to just go to the appropriate directory, type make make install. This _not_ the canonical way, and I wouldn't bet the rent money on it. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.10-stable nameserver strange behavior
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:44:38 -0500 (EST) Ken Cochran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi: How I refresh a system binary? More specifically, I think I may have a compromised(?) named in /usr/sbin but what I have in /usr/obj should be fine; if not I still have it in /usr/src and can rebuild/reinstall it. So how would I do the named only part of an installworld? I would try something like: cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/named make install Armin -- PUBBOX Postmaster + spam-killer, free email address at http://pubbox.net/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Migrating from 4.10-STABLE TO 6.1-STABLE questions
Hi: I'm in the process of doing a clean install on an older server that was running 4.10-STABLE to 6.1-STABLE. For the most part, it's been smooth, but I have a few questions: On boot, I get a couple of kernel messages that don't look optimal, and I just want to make sure there's no cause for concern. As always, I built a custom kernel with the stuff taken out that I'm pretty sure I don't need. This is an Intel L440GX dual PIII-1k MB with an Adaptec SCSI RAID: acpi0: PTLTD RSDT on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi: bad write to port 0x070 (8), val 0x43 acpi: bad read from port 0x071 (8) --- I noticed that acpi isn't in the standard Kernel config but loaded from an external file called PAE...is this an issue? Should that and/or the SMP file be edited when rebuilding the kernel? atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled pmtimer0 on isa0 This is the serial port driver...I may want to have one serial port enabled for remote console redirection...in the old kernel config, I'd just choose a driver with a different IRQ...but I don't see that option in the new GENERIC line I copied: # Serial (COM) ports device sio # 8250, 16[45]50 based serial ports I'd just like to make sure everything's ok before I stick this in a colo center. BTW, old FreeBSD used to put kernel binaries under /. I don't see them now...just curious, how is it handled now? Thanks! James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://3.am = ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrading to 4.10-STABLE
[redirected to questions@ since this is not -net stuff] Hi, Julius, 2005-03-16 17:01 +0300Julius Kidubuka Hi all, I am trying to upgrade from 4.10-RELEASE to 4.10-STABLE and I have gone through the following steps; 1. make buildworld 2. make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERN 3. make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERN 4. booted into single user mode and did, mount -u /, mount -a 5. make installworld 6. mergemaster 7. then finally rebooted My problem is after I have rebooted and issued the command uname -a, I still find that am running 4.10-RELEASE yet I have actually gone through all the steps above without any errors at all. Is there anything I could be doing wrong? Are you absolutely sure that you are sync'ing with 4-STABLE (now 4.11-STABLE), which is identified by RELENG_4? If you are sync'ing with RELENG_4_10, that's the 4.10-RELEASE security branch. Cheers, -- Xin LI delphij delphij net http://www.delphij.net/ signature.asc Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=E8=BF=99=E6=98=AF=E4=BF=A1=E4=BB=B6=E7=9A=84=E6=95=B0?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AD=97=E7=AD=BE=E5=90=8D=E9=83=A8?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=88=86?=
compile errors on kdelibs-3.3.1 on 4.10-STABLE
Hello, I've got a 4.10-STABLE box on which I'm trying to install KDE-3.3.1. I performed a fresh cvsup of ports yesterday (06 Dec 04). Leading up to this build, I deinstalled all ports, then added: perl5.8, xorg This is where the kdelibs comile fails: c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I../../../dcop -I../../../kio/kssl -I../../../dcop -I../../../libltdl -I../../../kdefx -I../../../kdecore -I../../../kdeui -I../../../kio -I../../../kio/kio -I../../../kio/kfile -I../../.. -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -D_GETOPT_H -D_THREAD_SAFE -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -O -pipe -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -c -o kcookiejar.la.o kcookiejar.la.cpp /bin/sh ../../../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX c++ -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -O -pipe -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -o kcookiejar -R /usr/local/lib -R /usr/X11R6/lib -R /usr/X11R6/lib -R /usr/local/lib -no-undefined -L/usr/X11R6/lib -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib kcookiejar.la.o libkdeinit_kcookiejar.la -Wl,-export-dynamic -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -ljpeg -L/usr/X11R6/lib gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.3.1/kioslave/http/kcookiejar' gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.3.1/kioslave/http' /usr/X11R6/bin/moc ./http.h -o http.moc source='http.cc' object='http.lo' libtool=yes \ DEPDIR=.deps depmode=gcc /bin/sh ../../admin/depcomp \ /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=compile --tag=CXX c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../dcop -I../../kio/kssl -I../../interfaces -I../../kio/httpfilter -I../../dcop -I../../libltdl -I../../kdefx -I../../kdecore -I../../kdeui -I../../kio -I../../kio/kio -I../../kio/kfile -I../.. -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include @INCLUDE_des@ -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -D_GETOPT_H -D_THREAD_SAFE -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -O -pipe -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -c -o http.lo http.cc c++: cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple compilations gmake[4]: *** [http.lo] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.3.1/kioslave/http' gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.3.1/kioslave/http' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.3.1/kioslave' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.3.1' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdebase3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kde3. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall37657.0 make DEPENDS_TARGET=package ** Fix the problem and try again. --- Build of x11/kde3 ended at: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 09:47:18 -0600 (consumed 00:38:31) --- Fresh installation of x11/kde3 ended at: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 09:47:18 -0600 (consumed 00:38:31) --- Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! x11/kde3 (unknown build error) --- Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed --- Session ended at: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 09:47:18 -0600 (consumed 00:38:58) It would seem the error: c++: cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple compilations is at the root of the problem, but I cannot find any info on why this is failing. I've tried the make three times. Thanks, in advance, for any assistance. -- Regards, Doug ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is preferred method to get new software on 4.10 stable?
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 10:43:09AM -0500, Ada Cheng wrote: Also don't forget to do a portsdb -Uu after you have cvsup and before portupgrade. Cheers, On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: [Andy Firman, 2004-11-15] Or is there some mechanism to get .80 in from the ports? Update your ports-tree using cvsup to get an up-to-date version. You should then install portupgrade, if you don't allready have it. Updating clamav from 0.75 to 0.80 should then be as easy as: # portupgrade clamav Remember to read /usr/ports/UPDATING after you've updated your ports-tree. Good advice thanks. Here is my actual process of doing this for other people new to FreeBSD if they would like to do the same. #cp /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile . (added proper mirror in the ports-supfile) #cvsup -g -L 2 ports-supfile Must have the portupgrade package in to run the portsdb command. I could not run portsdb as it was not installed yet because the portupgrade port was not installed. #cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade #make install #portsdb -Uu read /usr/ports/UPDATING after you've updated your ports-tree It is over 1,000 lines, but you can skim and look for software that is on your system in case you upgrade that particular software. #portupgrade clamav Then you need to edit the new conf file as it's different. Went from clamav.conf to clamd.conf...noticed that when skimming /usr/ports/UPDATING. Note: #portversion -l will provide you with a list of outdated installed ports/packages ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is preferred method to get new software on 4.10 stable?
Let's take Clamav for example. My freshclam logs say this: WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately ! So, I have clamav-0.75.1 installed from ports. What would be the proper way to get clamav .80 installed? pkg_delete clamav-0.75.1 and then install .80 from source? Or is there some mechanism to get .80 in from the ports? Thanks, Andy ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is preferred method to get new software on 4.10 stable?
[Andy Firman, 2004-11-15] Or is there some mechanism to get .80 in from the ports? Update your ports-tree using cvsup to get an up-to-date version. You should then install portupgrade, if you don't allready have it. Updating clamav from 0.75 to 0.80 should then be as easy as: # portupgrade clamav Remember to read /usr/ports/UPDATING after you've updated your ports-tree. Cheers, Svein Halvor ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is preferred method to get new software on 4.10 stable?
- Original Message - From: Andy Firman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 9:33 AM Subject: What is preferred method to get new software on 4.10 stable? Let's take Clamav for example. My freshclam logs say this: WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately ! So, I have clamav-0.75.1 installed from ports. What would be the proper way to get clamav .80 installed? pkg_delete clamav-0.75.1 and then install .80 from source? Or is there some mechanism to get .80 in from the ports? Thanks, Andy If you're ports tree has been kept up to date, you can go into the clamav ports dir and run make deinstall, then make reinstall right behind it to update it to current. -- Micheal Patterson Senior Communications Systems Engineer 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is preferred method to get new software on 4.10 stable?
Also don't forget to do a portsdb -Uu after you have cvsup and before portupgrade. Cheers, Ada On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: [Andy Firman, 2004-11-15] Or is there some mechanism to get .80 in from the ports? Update your ports-tree using cvsup to get an up-to-date version. You should then install portupgrade, if you don't allready have it. Updating clamav from 0.75 to 0.80 should then be as easy as: # portupgrade clamav Remember to read /usr/ports/UPDATING after you've updated your ports-tree. Cheers, Svein Halvor ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems compiling Oracle9i client into PHP 4.3.8 on 4.10-STABLE
I've install my client libraries in /compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/9.0.1/client and set the environment variables as below setenv ORACLE_BASE /compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/9.0.1/client setenv ORACLE_HOME /compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/9.0.1/client setenv TNS_ADMIN /compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/9.0.1/client/network/admin I'm using the php from the port in /usr/port/lang/php4 but I'm building it myself from the work directory the standard configure line but with the added oci8 option as this is not includeding the php4-extensions port. ./configure --enable-versioning --enable-memory-limit --with-layout=GNU --with-config-file-scan-dir=/usr/local/etc/php --disable-all --with-regex=php --with-apxs=/usr/local/sbin/apxs --enable-debug --disable-ipv6 --prefix=/usr/local i386-portbld-freebsd4.10 --with-oci8 when running the configure it works fine displays that its found oracle client checking for Oracle-OCI8 support... yes checking Oracle Install-Dir... /compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/9.0.1/client checking Oracle version... 9.0 checking for OCIEnvNlsCreate in -lclntsh... (cached) no checking for OCILobIsTemporary in -lclntsh... (cached) no checking for OCILobIsTemporary in -locijdbc8... (cached) no I've copied the include files into ext/oci8 and into main/ like they tell you to but when I try to compile it at the end of the compile it fails with this error cc -shared ext/oci8/oci8.lo regex/regcomp.lo regex/regexec.lo regex/regerror.lo regex/regfree.lo ext/standard/array.lo ext/standard/base64.lo ext/standard/basic_functions.lo ext/standard/browscap.lo ext/standard/crc32.lo ext/standard/crypt.lo ext/standard/cyr_convert.lo ext/standard/datetime.lo ext/standard/dir.lo ext/standard/dl.lo ext/standard/dns.lo ext/standard/exec.lo ext/standard/file.lo ext/standard/filestat.lo ext/standard/flock_compat.lo ext/standard/formatted_print.lo ext/standard/fsock.lo ext/standard/head.lo ext/standard/html.lo ext/standard/image.lo ext/standard/info.lo ext/standard/iptc.lo ext/standard/lcg.lo ext/standard/link.lo ext/standard/mail.lo ext/standard/math.lo ext/standard/md5.lo ext/standard/metaphone.lo ext/standard/microtime.lo ext/standard/pack.lo ext/standard/pageinfo.lo ext/standard/parsedate.lo ext/standard/quot_print.lo ext/standard/rand.lo ext/standard/reg.lo ext/standard/soundex.lo ext/standard/string.lo ext/standard/scanf.lo ext/standard/syslog.lo ext/standard/type.lo ext/standard/uniqid.lo ext/standard/url.lo ext/standard/url_scanner.lo ext/standard/var.lo ext/standard/versioning.lo ext/standard/assert.lo ext/standard/strnatcmp.lo ext/standard/levenshtein.lo ext/standard/incomplete_class.lo ext/standard/url_scanner_ex.lo ext/standard/ftp_fopen_wrapper.lo ext/standard/http_fopen_wrapper.lo ext/standard/php_fopen_wrapper.lo ext/standard/credits.lo ext/standard/css.lo ext/standard/var_unserializer.lo ext/standard/ftok.lo ext/standard/aggregation.lo ext/standard/sha1.lo TSRM/TSRM.lo TSRM/tsrm_strtok_r.lo TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.lo main/main.lo main/snprintf.lo main/spprintf.lo main/php_sprintf.lo main/safe_mode.lo main/fopen_wrappers.lo main/alloca.lo main/php_scandir.lo main/php_ini.lo main/SAPI.lo main/rfc1867.lo main/php_content_types.lo main/strlcpy.lo main/strlcat.lo main/mergesort.lo main/reentrancy.lo main/php_variables.lo main/php_ticks.lo main/streams.lo main/network.lo main/php_open_temporary_file.lo main/php_logos.lo main/output.lo main/memory_streams.lo main/user_streams.lo Zend/zend_language_parser.lo Zend/zend_language_scanner.lo Zend/zend_ini_parser.lo Zend/zend_ini_scanner.lo Zend/zend_alloc.lo Zend/zend_compile.lo Zend/zend_constants.lo Zend/zend_dynamic_array.lo Zend/zend_execute_API.lo Zend/zend_highlight.lo Zend/zend_llist.lo Zend/zend_opcode.lo Zend/zend_operators.lo Zend/zend_ptr_stack.lo Zend/zend_stack.lo Zend/zend_variables.lo Zend/zend.lo Zend/zend_API.lo Zend/zend_extensions.lo Zend/zend_hash.lo Zend/zend_list.lo Zend/zend_indent.lo Zend/zend_builtin_functions.lo Zend/zend_sprintf.lo Zend/zend_ini.lo Zend/zend_qsort.lo Zend/zend_multibyte.lo Zend/zend_execute.lo sapi/apache/sapi_apache.lo sapi/apache/mod_php4.lo sapi/apache/php_apache.lo main/internal_functions.lo -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/9.0.1/client/lib -L/compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/9.0.1/client/lib -lcrypt -lcrypt -lm -ldl -lm -lclntsh -lcrypt -lcrypt -Wl,-soname -Wl,libphp4.so -Wl,-retain-symbols-file -Wl,/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.3.8/sapi/apache/php.sym -o .libs/libphp4.so /usr/libexec/elf/ld: cannot find -ldl *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.3.8. However I've tried this method on redhat linux 9 and it works fine. I believe the -ldl that it can't find is something to do with mod_so support for apache but thats all i know. Brian Hood, ___ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com ___ [EMAIL
ports upgrade question 4.10 stable
I am a new FreeBSD user coming from Debian Linux. I think I have finally got the upgrading process done right. I just need to know if I am missing anything or have something configured wrong. I have gotten bits and pieces from this forum, FreeBSD handbook and the examples that came with this installation. The following is the supfile that I use with cvsup (no-gui) # start supfile # $FreeBSD: src/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile,v 1.19.2.6 # 2002/08/06 08:24:46 blackend Exp $ modified from the original file # above cvsup hosts listed at # http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mirrors.html. *default host=cvsup4.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress # Main Ports Tree. ports-all # end supfile The following script is the one I use to upgrade the ports: # start of script file cd /usr/ports # # check and rebuild pkg database pkgdb -Fuvf # # run ports-all cvs cvsup -g -L 2 -r 5 /root/stable-ports-supfile echo . echo strike any key to continue clear # # check and rebuild again the pkg db pkgdb -Fuvf # # get new list and check for insecure programs portaudit -aF /root/portaudit_log.txt clear less /root/portaudit_log.txt # # not sure if this is needed...portmanager /usr/local/bin/portmanager -s /root/portmanager_status_log.txt clear less /root/portmanager_status.txt clear # # check for any needed steps before updating less /usr/ports/UPDATING # clear echo It is VERY important that you read all echo of the UPDATING file! echo . echo If you ignore the contents of this file, echo you may end up with a broken system... echo . echo You have been warned echo . echo If after reading the UPDATING file, you need echo to make any manual changes...Ctrl C to echo abort this script echo . echo otherwise strike a key to do a portupgrade read JUNK clear # # perform upgrade and generate a list of ports portupgrade -a -v -l /root/portupgrade_log.txt clear less /root/portupgrade_log.txt # # check and rebuild agian the pkg db pkgdb -Fuvf # end of script file -- - Windows users say they travel at the speed of sound - Linux users say they travel at the speed of light - FreeBSD users say...what's taking you guys so long? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help wanted with NAT/IPFW settings (4.10 stable)
Hi I am using FreeBSD 4.10 stable (cvsupped about a month ago), and I have hit a problem with the firewall configuration and allowing a specific application to work. At the moment all sorts of things work correctly: The FreeBSD machine acts as a test-server and firewall when I'm working from home My WinXP and Apple OSX 10.3.5 desktops can see web pages, send/rcv email I use vtun to enable all 3 machines to access my corporate VPN, What is NOT working is iChatAV on the Mac. The remote person always seems to get a connection timed out error stating that they are unable to connect to 10.0.1.1 (the ip address of the mac on the INTERNAL network, rather than the fixed IP address of my DSL modem) The DSL modem thingy contains a primitive firewall, and applies NAT to the packets addressed to the external ethernet address of my FreeBSD computer. This computer then uses firewall/NAT rules to allow packets in to/out from the other two computers. I can even successfully play Quake III on-line from the Windows box, so the NAT redirection of UDP packets is working there... If anyone on the list has successfully configured this to work, I will be prepared to send you my rc.firewall and natd.conf files to see if you can help me. Mike === Michael Doyle email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator mobile: +353 87 235 7853 Co-operation Ireland http://www.cooperationireland.org/ Phone: +353-1-661 0588 Fax: +353-1-661 8456 *** ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VMWare 2 works on FreeBSD 4.10-Stable (except for NIC)
I have everything working except for the networking (which is proving to be very difficult). I followed Phusion's guide for VMWare 2 and FreeBSD 4.10 located here: http://www.packetwatch.net/documents/guides/freebsd/vmware2.php Previously I had tried 4.10, but I think at that time I was erroneously entering vmnet1 in to the NIC config, instead of /dev/vmnet1. I was also getting ATA errors on that particular machine's 200GB drives, which is prolly a completely different problem. My Win 2000 Pro virtual machine can ping itself, but not the host machine, or any of my other LAN machines. Christian emailed me some instructions that differ from Phusion's regarding the configuration of the /usr/local/etc/vmware/config file. Christian has these 2 lines while Phusion does not (and I tried it both ways): vmnet1.Bridged = YES vmnet1.BridgedInterface = x10 Phusion does mention the x10 in his instructions for the /etc/rc.firewall. My IP setting are: Linksys Router: 192.168.0.1 FreeBSD 4.10-Stable PC Static IP: 192.168.0.24 DNS Server: 167.206.1.103 Gateway:192.168.0.1 SubnetMask: 255.255.255.0 VMWare /usr/local/etc/vmware/config: vmnet1.HostOnlyAddress = 192.168.0.10 vmnet1.HostOnlyNetMask = 255.255.255.0 (also from Christian's doc) vmnet1.Bridged = YES vmnet1.BridgedInterface = x10 Win2000 Pro Virtual PC Static IP: 192.168.0.11 Gateway: 192.168.0.10 SubnetMask: 255.255.255.0 I made the changes to my kernel, /etc/rc.conf, /etc/rc.firewall, and /etc/fstab that Phusion indicated. Any ideas why my Virtual Machine cannot ping either the HostOnly IP or the FreeBSD's machine normal IP? It also cannot ping my Linksys router, or any of my other machines. Inside the VM I have the NIC defined as Custom and /dev/vmnet1. The HostOnly and Bridged options did not work, as they seemed to be leaving off the /dev/ in front of vmnet0 and vmnet1 (as I did too!). Aside from no networking, Win 2000 Pro seems to be running pretty well inside VMWare 2.0. thx! ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VMWare 2 works on FreeBSD 4.10-Stable (SOLVED!)
I have mostly everything working now: special thanks to George Hartzell, Christian Hiris, Phusion, and Orlando Bassotto. I will write up my experience after I digest it a little more. A few of the gotchas were that I originally did not install bridging when I installed vmware, and when I did, I was binding it to the wrong NIC (I was binding it to Christian's NIC, lol). For some reason I *had* to select Custom as the VM's ethernet type, and use the value of /dev/vmnet1 when I did. Bridged and HostOnly did not work. Also the VM's gateway setting had to be that of my Linksys router, and not the Host IP of my FreeBSD machine. I ended up running VMWare 2.0 on FreeBSD 4.10-Stable. I will make another attempt at VMWare 3.2 and also using FBSD 5.x when I have more time (in about 2 months). I am ecstatic, I get to run FreeBSD now! Woo Hoo!! thanks! ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
weird problem following 4.10-STABLE build....
After upgrading to 4.10-STABLE I have noticed some weird issues with email. My remote clients are unable to connect to the mail server, even though they can access websites on it. Since they arent even getting to the server, the logs show nothing. At first I suspected networking issues. I checked everything and there dont seem to be any problems. The only thing I changed when doing the upgrade was I increased kern.maxfiles to 12288. Also, my top level ISP does not delegate reverse authority. So the mail server ip reverses to something else when outside my network. Any ideas? Thanks John ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird problem following 4.10-STABLE build....
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, John Von Essen wrote: After upgrading to 4.10-STABLE I have noticed some weird issues with email. My remote clients are unable to connect to the mail server, even though they can access websites on it. Since they arent even getting to the server, the logs show nothing. At first I suspected networking issues. I checked everything and there dont seem to be any problems. The only thing I changed when doing the upgrade was I increased kern.maxfiles to 12288. Also, my top level ISP does not delegate reverse authority. So the mail server ip reverses to something else when outside my network. Did you 'cd /etc/mail make all install restart' to rebuild and reinstall your sendmail config files? -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sendmail from 4.10-STABLE firewall
+++ Joe Kraft [freebsd] [24-08-04 22:49 +0100]: | | | Chuck Swiger wrote: | Joe Kraft wrote: | | I'm using a 4.10-STABLE based firewall, which is happily chugging | along. It's sending it's daily messages to a local account via | sendmail, which I check by logging in using an ssh connection. | | [ ... ] | | 3) Is there a way to convince sendmail to send to something like | [EMAIL PROTECTED] I could just put that in my existing aliases file and | not have to install anything more. | | | The key part of your request is answered by using IP addrs in square | brackets, which will not require DNS MX or A lookups. So, add something | like: | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | ...to the ~/.forward file of root or wherever the mail is going to now. | Yes, you could put this in the aliases, or even use a mailertable to | redirect all local mail to the other system. | | | I tried doing it that way and it wouldn't go out either. I wound up | adding the 10.0.0.55 server to /etc/hosts and letting sendmail do it's | lookup there. I never convinced sendmail to send to to the user foo on | the 10.0.0.55 server, is that supposed to be possible? | | Joe. try: echo this is a test mail | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (works in tcsh) Regards, Shantanu ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sendmail from 4.10-STABLE firewall
Chuck Swiger wrote: Joe Kraft wrote: I'm using a 4.10-STABLE based firewall, which is happily chugging along. It's sending it's daily messages to a local account via sendmail, which I check by logging in using an ssh connection. [ ... ] 3) Is there a way to convince sendmail to send to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] I could just put that in my existing aliases file and not have to install anything more. The key part of your request is answered by using IP addrs in square brackets, which will not require DNS MX or A lookups. So, add something like: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...to the ~/.forward file of root or wherever the mail is going to now. Yes, you could put this in the aliases, or even use a mailertable to redirect all local mail to the other system. I tried doing it that way and it wouldn't go out either. I wound up adding the 10.0.0.55 server to /etc/hosts and letting sendmail do it's lookup there. I never convinced sendmail to send to to the user foo on the 10.0.0.55 server, is that supposed to be possible? Joe. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sendmail from 4.10-STABLE firewall
Joe Kraft wrote: I'm using a 4.10-STABLE based firewall, which is happily chugging along. It's sending it's daily messages to a local account via sendmail, which I check by logging in using an ssh connection. [ ... ] 3) Is there a way to convince sendmail to send to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] I could just put that in my existing aliases file and not have to install anything more. The key part of your request is answered by using IP addrs in square brackets, which will not require DNS MX or A lookups. So, add something like: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...to the ~/.forward file of root or wherever the mail is going to now. Yes, you could put this in the aliases, or even use a mailertable to redirect all local mail to the other system. -- -Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sendmail from 4.10-STABLE firewall
I'm using a 4.10-STABLE based firewall, which is happily chugging along. It's sending it's daily messages to a local account via sendmail, which I check by logging in using an ssh connection. I would like to have it send those mails to another mail server behind the firewall, but I'm curious recommendations for the best way to do that. I've looked at a couple of different ways: 1) Add the local domain DNS to it's list so it can find the IP of the local mail server. It seems like this would decrease the security of the firewall a bit. 2) The handbook has a section about setting up to send only using the mail/ssmtp port. This looks like my local mailer needs to resolve somehow (/etc/hosts??) on my firewall 3) Is there a way to convince sendmail to send to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] I could just put that in my existing aliases file and not have to install anything more. 4) Better options?? I appreciate recommendations you can provide or any pointers to existing information to help me figure out the best solution. Thanks, Joe Kraft ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4.10-STABLE
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 6:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 4.10-STABLE Needing some help here, I'm experincing compatibility issues with Perl and trying to reinstall ports/src what you want is probably cvsup http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.10-STABLE
Needing some help here, I'm experincing compatibility issues with Perl and trying to reinstall ports/src but Sysinstall has tryed alot of ftp mirrors even the main one and it says Warning: Can't find the `4.0-STABLE` distribution on this FTP server. I cant download anything under Distribtutions in Sysinstall. Is this a unrelated issue or is there more to this then i know of.. I went to 4.0-Stable, cause its the latest 4.X branch distro. Perl: What ever i do, perl5.8/perl5 always builds as a incomplete broken distro with one test failing with Taint.. No idea what it is, but planing on reading it source code. Anways any and all help is greatly needed.. Thanks ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.10 stable: xfree86 driver for ati rage xl chipset?
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 04:36:26PM -0400, andrew kagan wrote: Hi All: I've been trying to install xfree86 at the same time I'm installing 4.10 stable. The graphical configuration tool comes up fine, but when I try to specify the adapter, there's nothing in the list that refers to ATI at all. If I try to select the default vga adapter, after the config is written and xfree86 attempts to load, my video doesn't work at all. Is there a way to drop out of xfree86 at this point, even before install has completed? I can't proceed to complete the install at this point. Or should I be skipping configuration of xfree86 at this point and do it after FreeBSD is installed? You might want to try installing FreeBSD stable without X, and then once installed go to: /usr/ports/x11/xorg And install this meta port of the X.Org X11R6.7.0 release. Once installed, follow the instructions at: http://freedesktop.org/XOrg/ConfigurationHelp I found that the best way to configure X11R6.7.0 is to first run (as root) X -configure, which does an excellent job of detecting my hardware. I next copy the resultant configuration file to the correct location as decribed, then carry out final tweaking using both manual editing of the config file and xorgcfg -textmode. X11R6.7.0 performs much more satisfactorily with my ATI Radeon 9200 graphics card and Iiyaya Vision Master 1451 monitor than I have been able to persuade XFree86 4.3.0 to do, and what helps greatly is that post installation configuration is simplicity itself. -- Anthony Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Starting Apache on 4.10 stable at boot time
Hi all, I moved our work server over from 5.2 release to 4.10 stable. All seems fine except for some reason apache (apache-1.3.31_2) doesn't sart automatically at boot time. Does starting apache at boot time differ on 4.10 to 5.2? I have the apache.sh script in rc.d/ and it has correct privileges. What am in missing? Thanks, Gareth __ Herbalife Independent Distributor http://www.healthiest.co.za ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Starting Apache on 4.10 stable at boot time
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Gareth Bailey wrote: Does starting apache at boot time differ on 4.10 to 5.2? I have the apache.sh script in rc.d/ and it has correct privileges. Anything in /var/log/httpd_error_log ? In particular check any critical erros from mod_unique_id about (reverse) resolution of host names. Dw. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Starting Apache on 4.10 stable at boot time
On 2004-06-18T16:37:47+0200, Gareth Bailey wrote: Hi all, I moved our work server over from 5.2 release to 4.10 stable. All seems fine except for some reason apache (apache-1.3.31_2) doesn't sart automatically at boot time. Does starting apache at boot time differ on 4.10 to 5.2? I have the apache.sh script in rc.d/ and it has correct privileges. What am in missing? cd /usr/ports/www/apache13 cat pkg-message -- Mike perl -e 'print unpack(u,88V]N=%C=\!I;F9O(EN(AE861EG,*);' pgpRhQg1c2yfU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Starting Apache on 4.10 stable at boot time
On 18 Jun 2004 at 10:42, Michael W. Oliver wrote: On 2004-06-18T16:37:47+0200, Gareth Bailey wrote: Hi all, I moved our work server over from 5.2 release to 4.10 stable. All seems fine except for some reason apache (apache-1.3.31_2) doesn't sart automatically at boot time. Does starting apache at boot time differ on 4.10 to 5.2? I have the apache.sh script in rc.d/ and it has correct privileges. What am in missing? cd /usr/ports/www/apache13 cat pkg-message -- Mike perl -e 'print unpack(u,88V]N=%C=\!I;F9O(EN(AE861EG,*);' Do you have apache_start=YES in /etc/rc.conf ? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Starting Apache on 4.10 stable at boot time
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:42:55AM -0400, Michael W. Oliver wrote: On 2004-06-18T16:37:47+0200, Gareth Bailey wrote: I moved our work server over from 5.2 release to 4.10 stable. All seems fine except for some reason apache (apache-1.3.31_2) doesn't sart automatically at boot time. Does starting apache at boot time differ on 4.10 to 5.2? I have the apache.sh script in rc.d/ and it has correct privileges. What am in missing? cd /usr/ports/www/apache13 cat pkg-message I'm also having this problem actually and I can't figure it out. Yes, I read the pkg-message and put the apache_enable=YES into /etc/rc.conf, but it seems like apache.sh never gets run at boot. I've checked all the seemingly-obvious things like the permissions etc. It will start if I do: # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache.sh start Since I obviously don't boot that often I haven't had chance to investigate further.. -- http://freebsdwiki.org/ - Encrypted mail welcome - keyid 0xBF15490B Last year I went fishing with Salvador Dali. He was using a dotted line. He caught every other fish. -- Steven Wright pgpHSytY957Vx.pgp Description: PGP signature
4.10 stable: xfree86 driver for ati rage xl chipset?
Hi All: I've been trying to install xfree86 at the same time I'm installing 4.10 stable. The graphical configuration tool comes up fine, but when I try to specify the adapter, there's nothing in the list that refers to ATI at all. If I try to select the default vga adapter, after the config is written and xfree86 attempts to load, my video doesn't work at all. Is there a way to drop out of xfree86 at this point, even before install has completed? I can't proceed to complete the install at this point. Or should I be skipping configuration of xfree86 at this point and do it after FreeBSD is installed? TIA, Andrew ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.10 stable: xfree86 driver for ati rage xl chipset?
Hi andrew, I'm running freeBSD 5.2 with a ati radeon card. In the xf86cfg go to configure video card(s), near the bottom will be 'vesa vesa' select it. I have been using it with my radeon card and have had no problems. Hope this helps some. Brett ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PPPoE/tun0 doesn't work after upgrade to 4.10 Stable
Hello All, i run into somekind of trouble after upgrading to the latest stable version of FreeBSD. After building and installing a new kernel and world from 4.9-Stable to 4.10-Stable the ppp-Deamon can't connect to my isp anymore. I have to switch to the old kernel to get it up and running again. Because ppp is working with the old kernel and ppp-config very well there must be some changes in the kernelconfig-file which i did not see. dmesg on the 4.10 Kernel says that every network interface is there, up and running. Does someone have had the same problem or a hint of what went wrong?? Thank you very much Michael ppp.log: Jun 4 19:24:48 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: /dev/tty: set log +debug Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: /dev/tty: dial dsl Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: ReadSystem: Checking default (/etc/ppp/ppp.conf). Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: ReadSystem: Checking dsl (/etc/ppp/ppp.conf). Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: ReadSystem: Checking dsl (/etc/ppp/ppp.conf). Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: set device PPPoE:rl1 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: set mru 1492 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: set timeout 0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: set authname net37294814 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: set authkey Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: set dial Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: set login Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: add default HISADDR Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: bundle: Establish Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: closed - opening Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: List of netgraph node ``rl1:'' (id 3) hooks: Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Found orphans - ethernet Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Connecting netgraph socket .:tun0 - [6]::tun0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Sending PPPOE_CONNECT to .:tun0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Found the following interfaces: Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 1, name rl0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 2, name rl1 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 3, name rl2 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 4, name lp0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 5, name lp1 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 6, name lp2 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 7, name ppp0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 8, name sl0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 9, name faith0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 10, name lo0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 11, name tun0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connected! Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: opening - dial Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Chat: deflink: Dial attempt 1 of 1 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: dial - carrier Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Waiting for carrier Jun 4 19:24:54 server last message repeated 4 times Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: carrier - hangup Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: deflink: Close Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connect time: 5 secs: 0 octets in, 0 octets out Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: 0 packets in, 0 packets out Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: total 0 bytes/sec, peak 0 bytes/sec on Fri Jun 4 19:24:50 2004 Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: hangup - closed Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: route_IfDelete (11) Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Found ff02:b::/32 fe80:b::2e0:7dff:fe81:df6a Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: route_IfDelete: Skip it (pass 0) Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Found ff02:b::/32 fe80:b::2e0:7dff:fe81:df6a Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: wrote 148: cmd = Delete, dst = ff02:b::/32, gateway = none Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: bundle: Dead -- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PPPoE/tun0 doesn't work after upgrade to 4.10 Stable
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:22:45 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All, i run into somekind of trouble after upgrading to the latest stable version of FreeBSD. After building and installing a new kernel and world from 4.9-Stable to 4.10-Stable the ppp-Deamon can't connect to my isp anymore. I have to switch to the old kernel to get it up and running again. Because ppp is working with the old kernel and ppp-config very well there must be some changes in the kernelconfig-file which i did not see. dmesg on the 4.10 Kernel says that every network interface is there, up and running. Does someone have had the same problem or a hint of what went wrong?? Thank you very much Michael You didn't miss any changes to the kernel config file. I had the same issues come up with PPPoE. From the dates in the ppp log, you hit the period where there was a problem. It has been fixed. Since you're able to connect using the old kernel, I'd suggest cvsupping new sources and rebuilding. HTH, Randy ppp.log: Jun 4 19:24:48 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: /dev/tty: set log +debug Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: /dev/tty: dial dsl Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: ReadSystem: Checking default (/etc/ppp/ppp.conf). Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: ReadSystem: Checking dsl (/etc/ppp/ppp.conf). Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: ReadSystem: Checking dsl (/etc/ppp/ppp.conf). Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: set device PPPoE:rl1 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: set mru 1492 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: set timeout 0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: set authname net37294814 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: set authkey Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: set dial Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: set login Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Command: dsl: add default HISADDR Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: bundle: Establish Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: closed - opening Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: List of netgraph node ``rl1:'' (id 3) hooks: Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Found orphans - ethernet Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Connecting netgraph socket .:tun0 - [6]::tun0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Sending PPPOE_CONNECT to .:tun0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Found the following interfaces: Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 1, name rl0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 2, name rl1 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 3, name rl2 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 4, name lp0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 5, name lp1 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 6, name lp2 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 7, name ppp0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 8, name sl0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 9, name faith0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 10, name lo0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Index 11, name tun0 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connected! Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: opening - dial Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Chat: deflink: Dial attempt 1 of 1 Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: dial - carrier Jun 4 19:24:50 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Waiting for carrier Jun 4 19:24:54 server last message repeated 4 times Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: carrier - hangup Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: deflink: Close Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connect time: 5 secs: 0 octets in, 0 octets out Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: 0 packets in, 0 packets out Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: total 0 bytes/sec, peak 0 bytes/sec on Fri Jun 4 19:24:50 2004 Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: deflink: hangup - closed Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: route_IfDelete (11) Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Found ff02:b::/32 fe80:b::2e0:7dff:fe81:df6a Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: route_IfDelete: Skip it (pass 0) Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: Found ff02:b::/32 fe80:b::2e0:7dff:fe81:df6a Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Debug: wrote 148: cmd = Delete, dst = ff02:b::/32, gateway = none Jun 4 19:24:55 server ppp[743]: tun0: Phase: bundle: Dead -- -- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Re: 4.10 stable release info
On Thu, 6 May 2004 10:36 pm, JJB wrote: The official 4.10 schedule says 4.10 stable release was scheduled for May 5. The FTP sites still have RC2 and the 4.10 to-do list talks about RC3. Anybody from the release team care to comment on what is the holdup and when 4.10 going to be updated to the mirror FTP sites? http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.10R/schedule.html Whenever I see a release put back I think Thank goodness for the FreeBSD team that they make sure that it is working before they release it rather than adhering to any artificial release dates. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.10 stable release info
The official 4.10 schedule says 4.10 stable release was scheduled for May 5. The FTP sites still have RC2 and the 4.10 to-do list talks about RC3. Anybody from the release team care to comment on what is the holdup and when 4.10 going to be updated to the mirror FTP sites? http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.10R/schedule.html ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.10 stable release info
ehm... just my 2 pence: i'm as eager as you to see new features implemented (the completion of ACPI support in the 5.x version, for example), but i really don't think this is an acceptable way to address people who are putting their skills and their time at the service of the FreeBSD community. please, watch your attitude. thanks ulisse bemer IT consultant ( FreeBSD user) - Original Message - From: JJB [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 2:36 PM Subject: 4.10 stable release info The official 4.10 schedule says 4.10 stable release was scheduled for May 5. The FTP sites still have RC2 and the 4.10 to-do list talks about RC3. Anybody from the release team care to comment on what is the holdup and when 4.10 going to be updated to the mirror FTP sites? http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.10R/schedule.html ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
