On Tuesday 07 September 2004 07:30 pm, JJB wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. But you did not answer my first question. I
> did not ask if ipfilter_enable="YES" was still valid in 5.3, but if
> the ipfilter bootable module is still included in 5.3 and auto
> loaded by the ipfilter_enable="YES" in rc.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 September 2004 05:03 pm, fbsd_user wrote:
>> Is there still a loadable module that gets auto loaded at boot
time
>> when rc.conf contains the ipfilter_enable="YES" statement like in
>> 4.10?
>
> ipfilter_enable is still an option in rc.conf.
>
>> Will the fi
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 05:03 pm, fbsd_user wrote:
> Is there still a loadable module that gets auto loaded at boot time
> when rc.conf contains the ipfilter_enable="YES" statement like in
> 4.10?
ipfilter_enable is still an option in rc.conf.
> Will the final stable version still need kerne
How is ipfilter delivered in 5.3 .iso version?
Is there still a loadable module that gets auto loaded at boot time
when rc.conf contains the ipfilter_enable="YES" statement like in
4.10?
Will the final stable version still need kernel option PFIL_HOOKS
added to the other ipfilter kernel options
